Palavras-chave
Information management
Ethics
Privacy
Como Citar
Resumo
This paper aims to examine the present status of the research field intercultural information ethics (IIE) including the foundational debate as well as specific issues that may open new views for research and practice in this field. The present iie debate focuses on a narrow view of the field leaving aside comparative studies with non-digital media as well as with other epochs and cultures. There is an emphasis on the question of privacy but other issues such as online communities, governmentality, gender issues, mobile phones, health care and the digital divide are on the agenda.
Bynum, Terrell Ward (2006). Flourishing Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8: 157-173.
Capurro, Rafael (2007). Intercultural Information Ethics. In: Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.): Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 21-38. Online: http://www. capurro.de/iie.html
Capurro, Rafael (2006a). Ethik der Informationsgesellschaft. Ein interkultureller Versuch. Online: http://www.capurro.de/parrhesia. html (accessed on April 21, 2008).
Capurro, Rafael (2005a). Privacy. An intercultural perspective. In Ethics and Information Technology 7: 37-47. Online: http://www.capurro. de/privacy.html
Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.) (2007). Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink.
Damasio, Antonio (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam Publishing.
Ess, Charles (2007). Can the Local Reshape the Global? Ethical Imperatives for Humane Intercultural Communication Online”. In Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.) (2007). Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 153-169.
Ess, Charles (2006). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. In Ethics and Information Technology 8:215-226.
Floridi, Luciano / Savulescu, Julian (2006). Information ethics: Agents, artefacts and new cultural perspectives. Ethics and Information Technology 8: 155-156.
Foucault, Michel (1983). Discourse and Truth: the Problematization of Parrhesia. University of California at Berkeley, October-November 1983. Online: http://foucault.info/documents/ parrhesia/ (Accessed on April 21, 2008).
Frohmann, Bernd (2007). Foucault, Deleuze, and the Ethics of Digital Networks. In Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.) (2007). Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 57-68.
Grodzinsky, Frances S. / Tavani, Herman T. (2007). The Internet and Community Building at the Local and Global Levels: Some Implications and Challenges. I. Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.): Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 135-149.
Heidegger, Martin (1987). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hiruta, Kei (2006). What pluralism, why pluralism, and how? A response to Charles Ess. Ethics and Information Technology 8: 227-236.
Hongladarom, Soraj (2007). Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective. In Hongladarom, Soraj / Ess, Charles (Eds.): Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group, 108-122.
Hongladarom, Soraj / Ess, Charles (Eds.) (2007). Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group.
Hongladarom, Soraj / Ess, Charles (2007a): Preface. In: ibid.: Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group, xi-xxxiii.
Hongladarom, Soraj (2001). Cultures and Global Justice. Online: http://www.polylog.org/them/3/fcshs-en-htm (Accessed on April 21, 2008).
International Review of Information Ethics (irie) (2004). International ICIE Symposium. Online: http://www.i-r-i-e.net/ (Accessed on April 21, 2008).
Kitiyadisai, Krisana (2005). Privacy rights and protection: foreign values in modern Thai context. In Ethics and Information Technology 7: 17-26.
Lü, Yao-huai (2007). Globalization and Informatioan Ethics. In Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.): Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 69-73.
Lü, Yao-huai (2005). Privacy and data privacy in contemporary China. In Ethics and Information Technology, 7: 7-15.
Nishigaki, Toru and Takenouchi, Tadashi (eds.) (2007): The Thought of Information Ethics. Tokyo: Communis 05 (in Japanese).
Nakada, Makoto (2007). The Internet within Seken as an old and indigenous world of meanings in Japan”. In Capurro, Rafael / Frühbauer, Johannes / Hausmanninger, Thomas (Eds.): Localizing the Internet. Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective. Munich: Fink, 177-203.
Nakada, Makoto / Tamura, Takanori (2005). Japanese conceptions of privacy: An intercultural perspective. In Ethics and Information Technology 7: 27-36.
Nishigaki, Toru (2006). The ethics in Japanese information society: Consideration on Francisco Varela’s The Embodied Mind from the perspective of fundamental informatics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8:237-242.
Rhee, Wonil (2007). The creative time of thermocline. Conflicts between and Becomings of different Time-spaces. In “Thermocline of Art. New Asian Waves” at the Center for Art and Media (Karlsruhe, Germany) Online: http://www.zkm.de/thermocline (Accessed on April 21, 2008).
Sontag, Susan (2004). Die Welt als Indien. In Lettre International, September, Vol. 65, 82-86.
Walzer, Michael (1994). Thick and Thin: Moral Arguments at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1989). Vortrag über Ethik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1984). Zu Heidegger. In: B.F. McGuiness (Ed.): Ludwig Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis. Gespräche, aufgezeichnet von Friedrich Waismann. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Esta revista científica se encuentra registrada bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. Por lo tanto, esta obra se puede reproducir, distribuir y comunicar públicamente en formato digital, siempre que se reconozca el nombre de los autores y a la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Se permite citar, adaptar, transformar, autoarchivar, republicar y crear a partir del material, para cualquier finalidad (incluso comercial), siempre que se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría, se proporcione un enlace a la obra original y se indique si se han realizado cambios. La Pontificia Universidad Javeriana no retiene los derechos sobre las obras publicadas y los contenidos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores, quienes conservan sus derechos morales, intelectuales, de privacidad y publicidad.
El aval sobre la intervención de la obra (revisión, corrección de estilo, traducción, diagramación) y su posterior divulgación se otorga mediante una licencia de uso y no a través de una cesión de derechos, lo que representa que la revista y la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana se eximen de cualquier responsabilidad que se pueda derivar de una mala práctica ética por parte de los autores. En consecuencia de la protección brindada por la licencia de uso, la revista no se encuentra en la obligación de publicar retractaciones o modificar la información ya publicada, a no ser que la errata surja del proceso de gestión editorial. La publicación de contenidos en esta revista no representa regalías para los contribuyentes.