Keywords
collective identity
cohesiveness
Catalan elections
How to Cite
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2013). A Political Theory of Populism. Quarterly Journal of economics, 128(2), 771-805. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs077
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided they blog. Proc. 3rd Intl. Workshop on Link Discovery (LinkKDD), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277
Aragón, P., Kappler, E. K., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y. (2013). Communication Dynamics in Twitter during Political Campaigns: The Case of the 2011 Spanish National Election. Policy and Internet, 5(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI327
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of one against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
Axelrod, R. (1986). An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095-1111.
Barclay, P. (2013). Strategies for Cooperation in Biological Markets, Especially For Humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.002
Bardhan, P. (2000). Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(4), 847-865. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/452480
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks [conferencia]. Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference (pp. 361-362). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. San Jose, Costa Rica.
Blondel, V., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008/pdf
Borge-Holthoefer, J., Walid, M., Darwish, K., & Weber, I. (2015). Content and Network Dynamics behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2015), Vancouver.
Brandes, U. (2001). A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
Cardenas, J. C., Stranlund, J. K., & Willis., C. E. (2000). Local Environmental Control and Institutional Crowding-Out. World Development, 28(10), 1719-1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00055-3
Centre d'Estudis d'opinió (2019). Baròmetre d’Opinió Política. 2a onada. http://www.rtve.es/contenidos/documentos/barometro_ceo_julio_2019.pdf
Conover, G., Ratkiewicz, F., Flammini, & Menczer. (2021). Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 89-96. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14126
Crowdford, S. E., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A Grammar of Institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975
Dávid-Barrett, T., & Dunbar, R. I. (2013). Processing Power Limits Social Group Size: Proceedings. Biological sciences, 280(1765), 20131151. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1151
Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
Delton, A. W., Cosmides, L., G. M., E., T., & Tooby, J. (2012). The Psychosemantics of free Riding: Dissecting the Architecture of a Moral Concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1252-1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027026
Deltona, A. W., Krasnowa, M. M., Cosmidesa, L., & Toobya, J. (2011). Evolution of Direct Reciprocity Under Uncertainty Can Explain Human Generosity in One-Shot Encounters. PNAS, 108(32). https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1102131108
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013). More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior. PLOS ONE, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079449
Dunbar, R. I. (1992). Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J
Festinger, L. (1950). The Spatial Ecology of Group Formation. En S. S. L. Festinger, Social Pressure in Informal Groups (pp. 146-161). Stanford University Press.
Gonçalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2011). Modeling Users’ Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation. PLoS ONE, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022656
Greve, H., & Argote, L. (2015). Behavioral Theories of Organization. En J. D. Wright, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 481-486). Elsevier.
Gross, J., & Dreu, C. K. (2019). The Rise and Fall of Cooperation Through Reputation and Group Polarization. Nature Communications, 10(776). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08727-8
Guerrero Solé, F., & Lopez Gonzalez, H. (2017). Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter: An Extended Model for Quantifying Political Distances in Multiparty Democracies. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317744163
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books.
Hamid, N., Pretus, C., & Sheikh, H. (2019, December 13). How Catalonia’s Push for Independence has Scrambled Spanish Politics. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/13/how-catalonias-push-independence-has-scrambled-spanish-politics/
Hamilton, W., Zhang, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Jurafsky, D., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Loyalty in Online Communities. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 540-543. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14972
Homans, G. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2772990
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., Bastian, M., & Muldoon, M. R. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Jenkins, R., Dowsett, A. J., & Burton, A. M. (2018). How Many Faces do People Know? Proc. R. Soc. B, 285, 20181319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1319
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World wide web (WWW '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY (pp. 591–600). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
Laclau, E. (2007). Ideology and post-Marxism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687882
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293
Monroig, R. (2018). Social Networks, Political Discourse and Polarization during the 2017 Catalan election. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5556
Morrow, E. C., & Watts, R. (1996). Donor-initiated common pool resource institutions: The case of the Yanesha Forestry Cooperative. World Development, 24(10), 1641-1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00064-2
Nagel, J. (1994). Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture. Social Problems, 41(1), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1994.41.1.03x0430n
Newman, M. (2003). The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167-256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
Newman, M. (2010). Networks An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five Rules for the Evolution. Science, 314(5805), 1560-1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. https://www.aeaweb.org/issues/130
Peña-Lopez, I., Congosto, M., & Aragon, P. (2014). Spanish Indignados and the Evolution of the 15M Movement on Twitter: Towards Networked Para-Institutions. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(2), 189-216. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931678
Piacentini, A. (2019). State Ownership and “State-Sharing”: The Role of Collective Identities and the Sociopolitical Cleavage between Ethnic Macedonians and Ethnic Albanians in the Republic of North Macedonia. Nationalities Papers, 47(3), 461-476. doi:10.1017/nps.2018.8
Pinker, S. (2007). The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Off-Record Indirect Speech Acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(4), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.023
Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive Sentiment as an Anti-Free Rider Psychological Device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 203–231. https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/papers/freerider.pdf
Retamozo, M. (2017). La teoría del populismo de Ernesto Laclau: una introducción. Estudios Políticos, 41, 157-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.espol.2017.02.002
Rodrigues, A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1980). The Balance Principle: Its Current State and its Integrative Function in Social Psychology. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 14(2), 85–136. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1982-23513-001
Sáinz, J. (2017, septiembre 05). El “sí” ganará con un 72% y un 50% de participación si se celebra el referéndum. https://www.elespanol.com/espana/politica/20170904/244226382_0.html
Schlag, K. H. (1998). Why Imitate, and If So, How? Journal of Economic Theory, 78(1), 130-156. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2347
Serrano, I. (2013). Just a Matter of Identity? Support for Independence in Catalonia. Regional & Federal Studies, 23(5), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.775945
Suárez, J. L., Mcarthur, B., & Soto-Corominas, A. (2015). Cultural Networks and The Future of Cultural Analytics. Proceedings of Culture and Computing. Doi: 10.1109/Culture.and.Computing.2015.37
Suárez, J. L., Sancho-Caparrini, F., & Vásquez, S. (2011). The Potosí Principle: Religious prosociality fosters self-organization of larger communities Under extreme natural and economic conditions. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr043
Takezawa, M., & Price, M. E. (2010). Revisiting “The Evolution of Reciprocity in Sizable Groups”: Continuous Reciprocity in the Repeated N-Person Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264(2), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.028
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1960). The Social Psychology of Groups. Social Forces, 38(4), 367-368.
Tomasello, M. (2014). The Ultra-Social Animal. European Journal of Social Psychology 44(3), 187-194. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2015
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006). Cognitive Adaptations for n-person Exchange: The Evolutionary Roots of Organizational Behavior. MDE Manage Decis Econ., 27(2-3), 103-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1287
Traulsen, A., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolution of Cooperation by Multilevel Selection. PNAS, 103(29), 10952-10955. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602530103
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment. Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Publications.
Von Beyme, K. (1985). Karl Marx and Party Theory. Government and Opposition, 20(1), 70-87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44483550
Yasseri, T., & Cihon, P. (2016). A Biased Review of Biases in Twitter Studies on Political. Frontiers in Physics, 4(34). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2016.00034
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public, encourages greater global exchange of knowledge.
The journal Universitas Humanística is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.