Published Sep 19, 2013



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Camila Carneiro Dias Rigolin

Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Researching on the expertise as a guiding tool for planning allows to explore the dimension of epistemological authority in defining policies. In the field of Social Studies of Science and Technology, there are few studies on the expertise when it comes to the Social Sciences and Humanities. This paper explores this relationship through the analysis of texts produced by a Brazilian government Think tank: the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA). The study was guided by the following question: what are the elements that characterize the IPEA institutionalized knowledge of science, technology and innovation? The theoretical concepts articulate Sociology of Science and Political Theory. The research methodology combined field and bibliometric analysis. The literature review revealed: the continuity and discontinuity of topics, research priorities; theoretical referentials and hegemonic and disciplinary approaches, as well as the authors profile.

Keywords

Think tanks, Expertise, Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I)Think Tanks, Expertise, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CT&I)Think tanks, Expertise, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (CT&I)

References
How to Cite
Dias Rigolin, C. C., & Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi, M. C. (2013). Institutionalized knowledge production in Brazilian Think tanks: science, technology and innovation according to the Institute of Applied Economic Research (1995-2010). Universitas Humanística, 76(76). Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/univhumanistica/article/view/3135
Section
Otras Voces