Keywords
expert test
fundamental rights
proportional principle (balancing test)
procedural burden
effective physical force
probatory relevance
How to Cite
Abstract
The thematic one of this article is a critical study of the conception that of the different modalities from corporal interventions expresses the Colombian Corte Constitucional in the C-822/2005 sentence. In this study, the position of the Corte Constitucional is criticized when considering, with base in the proportionality principle (balancing test), that diffuse public interests can have greater weight than the fundamental guarantee of the prohibition of the cruel, cruel and degrading treatment. Characteristics, a foundation and limits for these measures set out. The paper of the procedural burden like alternative to the use of the effective force in the application of these interventions is analyzed. Also, the probatory relevance of these measures is examined.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.