Keywords
gender
equality right
Colombia
moral sense
pragmatist
post-structuralism
How to Cite
Abstract
This article is a reflection of notions like sex, gender and moral over many
philosophical ways of thinking: from John Dewey’s pragmatism through
Rorty’s contemporary, passing by the theory of moral sense, the poststructuralism, among others. This also is an attempt to give judge elements
in order to coordinate the constitutional interpretation of the equality right
around sexual diversity made for the Constitutional Colombian Court with
the enquiries advances succeeded in the national and international academic
scope. First of all, there will be a conceptual tour down many philosophical
slopes, and after that It will be a critic of the substantiated notions of the truth
of sex and an exemplification of the latent possibility of sexual subversion in
the case of transgender. Second chapter rescues elements of the moral sense
and pragmatist’s ethics, face to the way of the direction gave to the gender
problematic. The last one it will be a parallel between conceptual frameworks
treated and the interpretive debate raised inside the colombian legal system.
In the last reflection it will be a nesting of all the inputs across the Dewey’s
theoric shaft, and provide some tools to deal with the theoric conflicts which
emerge from the fights for the recognition of the sexual diversity.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.