THE DISCRETIONAL DISPOSITION OF THE ACCUSATION IN THE COLOMBIAN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION SYSTEM
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

criminal accusation
disposability
discretionality
criminal policy
plea bargaining
principle of opportunity

How to Cite

Mestre Ordoñez, J.F. (2008) “THE DISCRETIONAL DISPOSITION OF THE ACCUSATION IN THE COLOMBIAN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION SYSTEM”, Vniversitas, 57(116), pp. 201–221. Available at: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnijuri/article/view/14565 (Accessed: 2 July 2025).
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The legal reform on the Colombian criminal prosecution system has lead to the consecration of figures that imply the possibility of disposition of the criminal accusation by the National Public Prosecutors Office. Within its function to execute the States criminal policy and in spite of an erratic legislation, the Public Prosecutors Office has mechanisms like the plea bargaining and the principle of opportunity that allow it to make convenience and effectiveness judgments in the context of the criminal
persecution, beside the pertinent legal judgments. In spite of the evidence and the convenience of the previous, some sectors of the jurisprudence and the doctrine have argued against the disposability of the penal pretension and to the discretionality in its exercise, thus it is pertinent to value these characteristics and to formulate an argumentative line that justifies them from the legal and political point of view.

PDF (Spanish)

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.