Versions
- 2020-12-01 (2)
- 2020-02-27 (1)
Keywords
price fixing
transportation
apps
How to Cite
Abstract
Urban transportation has been one of the economic sectors that has been impacted the most by mobile apps. These have reduced entry and transaction costs of such magnitude that markets have flourished. However, and as is often the case, regulation has not evolved as rapidly. These digital platforms create a challenge to regulation, and has impacted our notion of free competition. Thus, it is important to understand the economic consequences –negative and positive- that this technologies create in order to better grasp their business model, price formation and transaction processes, and, ultimately, avoid regulating them inappropriately via regulatory boxes that no longer fit reality.
Ahmore Burger Smidt y Graeme Wickins, “The Uber Price-fixing Ride: What are the Antitrust Co-ordinates?”. Disponible en: https://www.werksmans.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/061416-Uber-Pricing-Fixing.pdf
Alasdair Pal, “India’s competition commission rejects price-fixing allegations against Uber and Ola”, Reuters, November 7, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-ola-antitrust/indias-competition-commission-rejects-price-fixing-allegations-against-uber-and-ola-idUSKCN1NC1BE
Alfonso Miranda Londoño y Gabriel Ibarra Pardo, “El estado actual de la práctica de fijación unilateral de precios (FUP) en Colombia”. Revista Derecho de la Competencia, Vol. 12 No. 12, enero-diciembre 2016
Barak Orbach, “Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies”, en The Antitrust Source, American Bar Association, abril de 2016. Disponible en: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/apr16_orbach_4_11f.authcheckdam.pdf
Carlos Riquelme, Siddhartha Banerjee y Ramesh Johari, “Pricing in Ride-share Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach”, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University. Disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2568258
Comisión Nacional de Competencia Económica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Comunicado de prensa del 28 de abril de 2016. Disponible en: https://www.cofece.mx/banco-mundial-premia-opinion-de-cofece-sobre-empresas-de-redes-de-transporte/
David S. Evans, “Two-Sided Market Definition”, en ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Market Definition In Antitrust: Theory And Case Studies, 2009. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1396751
David S. Evans & Richard Schmalensee, “Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms”, 3 Competition Pol’y Int’l 150, 152, 2007
Jonathan Stempel, “Uber wins U.S. court appeal to push price-fixing case to arbitration”, Reuters, August 17, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-decision/uber-wins-u-s-court-appeal-to-push-price-fixing-case-to-arbitration-idUSKCN1AX1MU
Margaret C. Levenstein y Valerie Y. Suslow, “What Determines Cartel Success?”, en Journal of Economic Literature 44, 2006
Mayer v. Kalanick, No.1:2015cv0979796
Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Services Corp., 465 U.S. 752, 762 (1984)
Pleno de la Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica, Opinión OPN-008-2015, 4 de junio de 2015
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, “Preguntas frecuentes: Régimen de Protección de la Competencia”. Disponible en: http://www.sic.gov.co/sites/default/files/files/Nuestra_Entidad/Publicaciones/Preguntas_frecuentes_Regimen_de_Proteccion_de_la_Competencia.pdf
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 6110 del 27 de marzo de 2000
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 29302 del 2 de noviembre de 2000
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 17539 del 4 de junio de 2002
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 25402 del 6 de agosto de 2002
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 2830 del 23 de febrero de 2004
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 6839 del 23 de febrero de 2009
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 46111 del 30 de agosto de 2011
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 40598 del 27 de junio de 2014
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 56816 del 24 de septiembre de 2014
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 30300 del 23 de mayo de 2016
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.