Technological Impact on Procedural Law: Claim Correction, Testimonial Evidence and Constitutionality Statement C-134 of 2023


Published Dec 15, 2023

DOI https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj72.itdp


PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Juan Carlos Naizir Sistac
Universidad Externado de Colombia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

This research article aims to study the influence and changes that information and communications technologies -ICT- have generated in the judicial process regarding the correction of the claim and testimonial evidence, as well as the effects of digital justice to hold judicial hearings in person or virtually studied in the constitutionality statement C-134 of May 3, 2023 issued by the Constitutional Court of Colombia in which the constitutionality of the bill that modifies the law is reviewed statutory regulation of the administration of justice – Law 270 of 1996 –. It is concluded that by applying technology and virtuality to the judicial process, the correction of the claim must be integrated into a single document and the testimonial evidence has been modified in the way in which the spontaneity of the witness is protected and the inconveniences of being ruled out due to inability when the witness has a relative inability to testify virtually. Likewise, the Constitutional Court's affinity for virtual hearings, whether or not they involve evidence, and the judge's determination to define the modality of the hearing, stand out. For its preparation, the dogmatic method of legal research has been used, which takes into account the legal provisions, doctrine and jurisprudence of the high courts in Colombia.

Keywords

technology, virtuality, process, court hearing, testimony, claim correctiontecnología, virtualidad, proceso, audiencia, testimonio, subsanación de la demanda

References
Arce, R., y Fariña, F. (2013). Psicología forense experimental. Testigos y testimonio. Evaluación cognitiva de la veracidad de testimonios y declaraciones. En S. Delgado (Dir. Tratado), y S. Delgado, y J. M. Maza (Coords. Vol.), Tratado de medicina legal y ciencias forenses: Vol. V. Psiquiatría legal y forense (pp. 21-46). Barcelona: Bosch.
ARCE, Ramón. ANÁLISIS DE CONTENIDO DE LAS DECLARACIONES DE TESTIGOS: EVALUACIÓN DE LA VALIDEZ CIENTÍFICA Y JUDICIAL DE LA HIPÓTESIS Y LA PRUEBA FORENSE Acción Psicológica, vol. 14, núm. 2, diciembre-, 2017, pp. 171-190 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia Madrid, España.
Código de Procedimiento Civil o Decreto 1400 y 2019 de 1970.
Código General del Proceso o Ley 1564 de 2012.
Decreto Legislativo 806 de 2020.
Ley 2213 de 2022.
LÓPEZ BLANCO, Hernán Fabio. Código general del proceso. Parte general, Bogotá: Dupre Editores Ltda., 2019.
LÓPEZ BLANCO, Hernán Fabio. Código general del proceso. Pruebas, Bogotá: Dupre Editores Ltda., 2017.
PARRA QUIJANO, Jairo. Manual de derecho probatorio, Bogotá: Ediciones librería del profesional, 2007.
SANABRIA SANTOS, Henry. Derecho procesal civil general, Bogotá: Editorial Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2021.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia C-134 de 3 de mayo de 2023. Magistrada Ponente Natalia Ángel Cabo.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia C-420 de 24 de septiembre de 2020. Magistrado Ponente (E) Richard S. Ramírez Grisales.
How to Cite
Naizir Sistac, J. C. (2023). Technological Impact on Procedural Law: Claim Correction, Testimonial Evidence and Constitutionality Statement C-134 of 2023. Vniversitas, 72. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj72.itdp
Issue
Vol. 72 (2023): Publicación continua
Section
Edición ordinaria
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.