Keywords
necessity of criminal penalty
retribution
prevention
guilt
fundamental rights.
How to Cite
Abstract
The author addresses the question concerning the political grounds for a criminal penalty imposition, which leads to analyze the content of articles 3 and 4 of the Colombian Criminal Code, where the principles of necessity, proportionality and reasoning in the imposition of the penalty are articulated with the purposes that are recognized to it by the Colombian law. By this, it is found that even article 3 restricts the necessity penalty´s application by the judge, to the pre-established cases in the Criminal Code. Considering the distressing character of the penalty and its aptitude for the affectation of fundamental rights, the constitutional argumentation of the principles contained in article 3 must be required to the judge beyond the systematic and formal analysis that he can present about the “tipicidad”, the “antijuridicidad” and the “culpabilidad”. In consequence, in special cases in where it is possible to argue that the imposition of the penalty does not comply with these principles, the judge must be able to abstain from imposing the penalty or even graduate it below the legal minimum. In order to analyze the problem that has been presented, some theories about the purposes and necessity of the penalty are reviewed.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.