Publicado mar 15, 2018



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Lucas de Francisco Carvalho http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3274-9724

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo revisar la dimensión Impulsividad del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de la Personalidad (IDCP), así como para comprobar las propiedades psicométricas en una muestra no clínica. El procedimiento se realizó en dos etapas: paso 1, dirigido al desarrollo de nuevos productos y el paso 2 destinado a probar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión revisada. Como resultado de la primera etapa, se seleccionó un conjunto de 38 artículos. En el segundo paso, los elementos fueron probados en una muestra de 225 sujetos (70.1 % mujeres), con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 66 años (M = 26.2, DE = 8.1), en su mayoría estudiantes universitarios (58.9 %). Todos los sujetos respondieron el IDCP y las versiones brasileñas de ambos: el Inventario Revisado NEO Personality (NEO-PI-R) y el Inventario de Personalidad para el DSM-5 (PID-5). Como resultado, se obtuvo un conjunto de 18 artículos en tres factores interpretables, Inconsecuencia, Asunción de riesgos y Falsedad, con coeficientes de consistencia interna (α de Cronbach) de 0.89 para la puntuación total. Las correlaciones de los factores de Impulsividad con NEO-PI-R y PID-5 revelaron relaciones consistentes y esperadas. Los datos ponen de manifiesto la idoneidad de la nueva dimensión Impulsividad del IDCP.

Keywords

impulsivity, personality traits, inconsequence, personality disorders, DSM-5.impulsividad, rasgos de personalidade, inconsecuencia, trastornos de la personalidade, DSM-5

References
Abela, R. K. (2013). Validity evidences for the Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade (IDCP) in outpatient sample based on the DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of personality disorders (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th. ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for psychological and educational testing. New York: American Educational Research Association.

Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Wygant, D. B., Salekin, R. T., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Examining the associations between DSM-5 section III antisocial personality disorder traits and psychopathy in community and university samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(5), 675-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_134

Carvalho, L. F., Bartholomeu, D., & Silva, M. C. R. (2010). Instrumentos para avaliação dos transtornos da personalidade no Brasil. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(2), 289-298. Retrieved from http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000200013

Carvalho, L. F., Oliveira Filho, A. Q., Pessotto, F., & Bortolotti, S. L. V. (2014). Application of the unfolding model to the aggression dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP). Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 23(2), 339-349. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v23n2.41428

Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (2015). Development and internal structure investigation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(2), 322-330.

Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (2016). Prototype matching of personality disorders with the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(2), 1-9. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e322214

Carvalho, L. F., Primi, R., & Stone, G. E. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade (IDCP) using the Rating Scale Model. Avances en Psicologia Latinoamericana, 32(3), 433-446. doi: http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.12804/apl32.03.2014.09

Carvalho, L. F., Sette, C. P., Capitão, C. G., & Primi, R. (2014). Propriedades psicométricas da versão revisada da dimensão necessidade de atenção do Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade [Psychometric properties of the revised attention seeking dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory]. Temas em Psicologia, 22(1), 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2014.1-12

Carvalho, L. F., Souza, B. D. B., & Primi, R. (2014). Psychometric properties of the revised conscientiousness dimension of Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade (IDCP). Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 36(1), 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2013-0024

Clark, L. A. (1990). Toward a consensual set of symptom clusters for assessment of personality disorder. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Orgs.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 243-266). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Coid, J., & Ulrich, S. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51(4), 426-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.006

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. (2009). NEO-PI-R - Inventário de Personalidade NEO Revisado - Manual [NEO-PI-R - Revised NEO Personality Inventory - Manual]. São Paulo: Vetor.

Daniel, M. H. (1999). Behind the scenes: Using new measurement methods on the DAS and KAIT. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Orgs.), The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know (pp. 37-63). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 341-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341

Guy, L. S., Poythress, N. G., Douglas, K. S., Skeem, J. L., & Edens, J. F. (2008). Correspondence between self-report and interview-based assessments of antisocial personality disorder. Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.47

Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254742561_Structural_Equation_Modeling_Guidelines_for_Determining_Model_Fit

Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM-5 Personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of abnormal psychology, 121(2), 424-432. doi: 10.1037/a0026656

Huang, Y., Kotov, R., de Girolamo, G., Preti, A., Angermeyer, M., Benjet, C., . . . Kessler, R. C. (2009). DSM-IV personality disorders in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058552

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674

Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.019

McCloskey, M. S., New, A. S., Siever, L. J., Goodman, M., Koenigsberg, H. W., Flory, J. D., & Coccaro, E. F. (2009). Evaluation of behavioral impulsivity and aggression tasks as endophenotypes for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(12), 1036-1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.002

Millon, T., & Grossman, S. (2007a). Moderating severe personality disorders. New Jersey: Wiley.

Millon, T., & Grossman, S. (2007b). Overcoming resistant personality disorders. New Jersey: Wiley.

Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Tringone, R. (2010). The Millon Personality Spectrometer: A tool for personality spectrum analyses, diagnoses, and treatments. In T. Millon, R. F. Krueger & E. Simonsen (Orgs.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM-V and ICD-11 (pp. 391-418). New York: Guilford.

Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783-1793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1783

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. Mcgraw-Hill: NewYork.
Ohayon, M. M. (2009). Impulsivity, aggression and personality. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 1005-1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.07.003

Poythress, N. G., & Hall, J. R. (2011). Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 120-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.003

Samuel, D. B., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Ball, S. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating the proposed DSM-5 types and traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023787

Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Dimensions of personality pathology: An alternative to the five factor model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(10), 1743-1754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.10.1743

Swann, A. C., Lijffijt, M., Lane, S. D., Steinberg, J. L., & Moeller, F. G. (2009). Trait impulsivity and response inhibition in antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(12), 1057-1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.03.003

Watkins, M. W. (2006). Determining parallel analysis criteria. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 5(2), 344-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1162354020
Cómo citar
de Francisco Carvalho, L. (2018). Estudio de revisión de la dimensión Impulsividad del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de la Personalidad. Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-1.rsid
Sección
Artículos