2. Singla MG, Garg A, Gupta S. MTAD in endodontics: an update review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112(3): e70-6.
3. Clarkson RM, Podlich HM, Moule AJ. Influence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the active chlorine content of sodium hypochlorite solutions when mixed in various proportions. J Endod. 2011;37(4): 538-43.
4. Marques da Silva B, Baratto-Filho F, Leonardi DP, Henrique Borges A, Volpato L, Branco Barletta F. Effectiveness of ProTaper, D-RaCe, and Mtwo retreatment files with and without supplementary instruments in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J. 2012; 45(10): 927-32.
5. Al-Kilani MG, Whitworth JM, Dummer PM. Preliminary in vitro evaluation of Carisolv as a root canal irrigant. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(6): 433-40.
6. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spano JC, Marchesan MA, Pecora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13(2): 113-7.
7. Rolla G, Melsen B. On the mechanism of the plaque inhibition by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 1975; 54(Spec issue B): B57-62.
8. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Visai L, Selan L, Colombo M, Bianchi S, Poggio C. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012: 35(10): 826-31.
9. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 1981; 89(4): 321-8.
10. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002; 28(3): 181-4.
11. Di Fiore PM, Genov KA, Komaroff E, Li Y, Lin L. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. Int Endod J. 2006; 39(9): 700-8.
12. So MV, Saran C, Magro ML, Vier-Pelisser FV, Munhoz M. Efficacy of ProTaper retreatment system in root canals filled with gutta-percha and two endodontic sealers. J Endod. 2008; 34(10): 1223-5.
13. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J. 2012; 45(7): 614-8.
14. Dadresanfar B, Iranmanesh M, Mohebbi P, Mehrvarzfar P, Vatanpour M. Efficacy of Two rotary NiTi Instruments in removal of resilon/epiphany obturants. Iran Endod J. 2012; 7(4): 183-8.
15. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(2): 271-5.
16. Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012; 38(4): 445-8.
17. El Batouty KM, Elmallah WE. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2011; 37(9): 1290-2.
18. Hulsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(12): 810-30.
19. Caviedes J, Cabezas C, Morales D, Perera M, Tineo H. Biomecánica de la irrigación en el pronóstico de la endodoncia con sistemas de limas secuenciales rotatorias y limas únicas de movimiento alterno. Canal Abierto Rev Soc Endod Chile. 2012; 26(4): 4-13.
20. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod. 1977; 3(10): 394-8.
21. Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the final irrigation regimen. Int Endod J. 2010; 43(8): 663-72.
22. Topcu KM, Karatas E, Ozsu D, Ersoy I. Efficiency of the self adjusting file, WaveOne, Reciproc, ProTaper and hand files in root canal debridement. Europ J Dent. 2014; 8(3): 326-9.
23. Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schafer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2015; 48(1): 109-14.
24. Kamel WH, Kataia EM. Comparison of the efficacy of smear clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2014; 40(3): 446-50.
25. Arzate-Sosa G, Lara-Carrillo E, Villarreal-Camarena C, Scougall-Vilchis R, Ríos-Medina L. Comparative study of two rotary systems by evaluating irrigant penetration using a contrast medium. A pilot study. Rev ADM. 2013; 70(3): 140-5.
26. Plotino G, Giansiracusa Rubini A, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and waveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(8): 1228-30.
27. Dietrich MA, Kirkpatrick TC, Yaccino JM. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012; 38(8): 1140-4.
28. Bhatti N, Sroa R, Sikri VK. Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study. Contem Clin Dent. 2010; 1(2): 88-93.
29. Burklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012; 45(5): 449-61.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.