Stakeholder Evaluation of Health and Wellbeing Outcomes of Inclusive Public Space Interventions Delivered by the IN-HABIT Project

Keywords

co-design
health and well-being
inclusive urban development
participatory urban planning
public space interventions
vulnerable communities

How to Cite

Hodnieva, Y., Melichová, K., Bellérová, S., & Kuffová Popovicsová, J. (2025). Stakeholder Evaluation of Health and Wellbeing Outcomes of Inclusive Public Space Interventions Delivered by the IN-HABIT Project. Cuadernos De Vivienda Y Urbanismo, 18. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cvu18.sehw
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The article reports on the evaluation of the health and well-being outcomes of inclusive public space interventions co-designed, co-deployed, and co-managed within the IN-HABIT project in Nitra, Slovakia. Based on data from a questionnaire survey, the research highlights variations in perceived benefits across diverse social groups. Psychological well-being improved most among marginalised communities, while social cohesion and spatial satisfaction were significant across all target groups. The most substantial benefits were reported not merely from experiencing improved public spaces but from active participation in their design, implementation, and governance. These findings suggest that genuinely inclusive and impactful urban development should prioritise meaningful community participation, ensuring that interventions reflect the needs, aspirations, and lived experiences of diverse populations. By embedding participatory approaches into urban planning, cities can foster more equitable, resilient, and health-promoting environments.

Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Fry, B., Homewood, K., Mourato, S., Rowcliffe, J. M., Wallace, G., & Milner-Gulland, E. (2014). Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: A review of frameworks. Conservation and Society, 12(4), 437. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.155592

Ahmimed, C. (2018). Inclusive cities: trends and new initiatives. Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Division for Social Policy and Development, New York, NY.

Ala-Mantila, S., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S., & Saarsalmi, P. (2018). Spatial nature of urban well-being. Regional Studies, 52(7), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360485

Álvarez-Melcón, I., Sisto, R., Rodríguez, Á. D. J., & Pereira, D. (2024). Integrating the SDGs into urban regeneration: A Madrid Nuevo Norte case study using an adapted voluntary local review framework. Sustainability, 16(22), 9727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229727

Anderson, J., Ruggeri, K., Steemers, K., & Huppert, F. (2017). Lively social space, well-being activity, and urban design: Findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and Behavior, 49(6), 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516659108

Anderson, M., & Parker, B. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis of urban regeneration projects. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1739-1756.

Bauer, G. R. (2014). Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 10-17.

Belcher, Brian, and Markus Palenberg. 2018. ‘Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions: Toward Conceptual Clarity’. American Journal of Evaluation 39(4):478–95. doi: 10.1177/1098214018765698.

Benfer, E. A., Bhandary-Alexander, J., Cannon, Y., Makhlouf, M. D., & Pierson-Brown, T. (2021). Setting the health justice agenda: Addressing health inequity & injustice in the post-pandemic clinic. Clinical Law Review, 28(1), 45–84.

Braubach, M., Tobollik, M., Mudu, P., Hiscock, R., Chapizanis, D., Sarigiannis, D., Keuken, M., Perez, L., & Martuzzi, M. (2015). Development of a quantitative methodology to assess the impacts of urban transport interventions and related noise on well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 5792–5814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120605792

Bunnell, T. (2019). Inclusiveness in urban theory and urban-centred international development policy. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 30(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2019.30.2.1

Cassarino, Marica, Sina Shahab, and Sara Biscaya. 2021. ‘Envisioning Happy Places for All: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Transformations in the Urban Environment on the Wellbeing of Vulnerable Groups’. Sustainability 13(14):8086. doi: 10.3390/su13148086.

Collomb, Jean-Gaël E., Janaki R. Alavalapati, and Tim Fik. 2012. ‘Building a Multidimensional Wellbeing Index for Rural Populations in Northeastern Namibia’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 13(2):227–46. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2011.645532.

Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-167.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95 3, 542-75. DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2

Duncan, D. T., et al. (2017). Urban environment and health disparities in the United States. Journal of Urban Health, 94(1), 1-10.

Evans, R. G., Barer, M. L., & Marmor, T. R. (2015). Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of health in populations. Aldine de Gruyter.

Fleche, S., Smith, C., & Sorsa, P. (2011). Exploring Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing in OECD Countries: Evidence from the World Value Survey. DOI:10.1787/5K9FFC6P1RVB-EN

Fleuret, S., & Prugneau, J. (2015). Assessing students’ wellbeing in a spatial dimension. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12098

Franks, Daniel M., David Brereton, and Chris J. Moran. 2011. ‘Cumulative Social Impacts’. in New Directions in Social Impact Assessment, edited by F. Vanclay and A. M. Esteves. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Haas, B.K. (1999). Clarification and integration of similar quality of life concepts. Image--the journal of nursing scholarship, 31 3, 215-20. DOI:10.1111/J.1547-5069.1999.TB00483.X

Haider, J. (2007). Inclusive design: Planning public urban spaces for children. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, 160(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2007.160.2.83

Harding, Andrew. 2014. ‘What Is the Difference between an Impact and an Outcome? Impact Is the Longer Term Effect of an Outcome.’ Impact of Social Sciences. Retrieved 17 January 2025 (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/10/27/impact-vs-outcome-harding/).

Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Helliwell, J.F., & Putnam, R.D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 359 1449, 1435-46. DOI:10.1098/RSTB.2004.1522

Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1, 83–136.

Itair, M., Shahrour, I., & Hijazi, I. (2023). The use of the smart technology for creating an inclusive urban public space. Smart Cities, 6(5), 2484–2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6050112

Jennings, V., Rigolon, A., Thompson, J., Murray, A., Henderson, A., & Gragg, R. S. (2024). The dynamic relationship between social cohesion and urban green space in diverse communities: Opportunities and challenges to public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(6), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060800

Jian, I. Y., Chan, E. H. W., Xu, Y., & Owusu, E. K. (2021). Inclusive public open space for all: Spatial justice with health considerations. Habitat International, 118, 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102457

Keating, D. P. (2016). Social inequality in population developmental health. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 50, pp. 75–104). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.12.002

Khan, N., Keck, L., Sykes, C., Rowden, C., Simister, J., Fenlon, S., Mccallum, E., Bell, M., Whiting, D., Shelton, C., Wells, G., Giles, R., Howard, J., & Peckham, S. (2024). Diversity, community engagement and co-design in research: A rapid review. BMJ Leader. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001046

Kiefer, R.A. (2008). An integrative review of the concept of well-being. Holistic nursing practice, 22 5, 244-52. DOI:10.1097/01.HNP.0000334915.16186.b2

Kiefer, Ruth Ann. 2008. ‘An Integrative Review of the Concept of Well-Being’. Holistic Nursing Practice 22(5):244–52. doi: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000334915.16186.b2.

Lam, B., Zamenopoulos, T., Kelemen, M., & Hoo Na, J. (2017). Unearth hidden assets through community co-design and co-production. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3601–S3610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352863

Larson, Silva, Natalie Stoeckl, Diane Jarvis, Jane Addison, Sharon Prior, and Michelle Esparon. 2019. ‘Using Measures of Wellbeing for Impact Evaluation: Proof of Concept Developed with an Indigenous Community Undertaking Land Management Programs in Northern Australia’. Ambio 48(1):89–98. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1058-3.

Livingston, V., Jackson-Nevels, B., & Reddy, V. V. (2022). Social, cultural, and economic determinants of well-being. Encyclopedia, 2(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030079

Mac Fadden, I., Cocchioni, R., & Delgado-Serrano, M. M. (2024). A Co-Created Assessment Framework to Measure Inclusive Health and Wellbeing in a Vulnerable Context in the South of Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040510

Marmot, M., & Allen, J. (2014). Social determinants of health and well-being in urban environments. The Lancet, 384(9939), 287-293.

Marmot, M., Stansfeld, S., & Patel, C. (2012). Health inequalities and social determinants of health. The Lancet, 380(9847), 244-252.

Maruniak, E. O., Lisovskyi, S. A., Pokliatskyi, S. A., Mozghovyi, A. A., Petrovska, A. O., & Rumiantseva, M. V. (2021). Development of the capital city through the prism of inclusiveness (A case of Kyiv). Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2021.01.025

Medayese, S., Magidimisha-Chipungu, H. H., Popoola, A. A., Chipungu, L., & Adeleye, B. M. (2020). Thematic review of trends in inclusive urban development studies (2000-2020). In E. S. Osabuohien, E. A. Oduntan, O. Gershon, O. Onanuga, & O. Ola-David (Eds.), Practice, progress, and proficiency in sustainability (pp. 362–372). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4817-2.ch021

Meringolo, Patrizia, Carlo Volpi, and Moira Chiodini. (2019). ‘Community Impact Evaluation. Telling a Stronger Story’.

Mitrašinović, Miodrag, and Vikas Mehta. 2021. ‘Diversity and Inclusion in Public Space’. Pp. 59–63 in Public Space Reader, edited by M. Mitrašinović and V. Mehta. Routledge.

National Institute on Aging. (2020). Health disparities in older adults. https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/publication/health-disparities

Nguyen, Ngoc Thuy, Alexandra Collins, and Catherine Matilda Collins. 2024. ‘Trends and Patterns in the Application of Co-Production, Co-Creation, and Co-Design Methods in Studies of Green Spaces: A Systematic Review’. Environmental Science & Policy 152:103642. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103642.

Peters, Karin. 2010. ‘Being Together in Urban Parks: Connecting Public Space, Leisure, and Diversity’. Leisure Sciences 32(5):418–33. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2010.510987.

Prilleltensky, Isaac, Samantha Dietz, Ora Prilleltensky, Nicholas D. Myers, Carolyn L. Rubenstein, Ying Jin, and Adam McMahon. 2015. ‘ASSESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL WELL-BEING: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE I COPPE SCALE: I COPPE Scale’. Journal of Community Psychology 43(2):199–226. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21674.

Rishbeth, Clare. 2001. ‘Ethnic Minority Groups and the Design of Public Open Space: An Inclusive Landscape?’ Landscape Research 26(4):351–66. doi: 10.1080/01426390120090148.

Robert, Glenn, Louise Locock, Oli Williams, Jocelyn Cornwell, Sara Donetto, and Joanna Goodrich. 2022. Co-Producing and Co-Designing. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.

Romanelli, M. (2022). Towards Smart Inclusive Cities. PuntOorg International Journal, 7(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.19245/25.05.pij.7.2.6

Salsabila, S., & Navitas, P. (2024). Built environment design features, mental health, and well-being for inclusive urban design: An extensive literature review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1394(1), 012020.

Sarriera, Jorge Castellá, and Lívia Maria Bedin. 2017. ‘A Multidimensional Approach to Well-Being’. Pp. 3–26 in Psychosocial Well-being of Children and Adolescents in Latin America. Vol. 16, Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, edited by J. C. Sarriera and L. M. Bedin. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Schonhardt, Samantha, Stephanie Sullivan, and Rebecca Shisler Marshall. 2023. ‘A Focused Review of Multidimensional Well-Being Assessments’. Journal of Wellness 4(2). doi: 10.55504/2578-9333.1140.

Sfeatcu, R., Cernuşcă-Miţariu, M., Ionescu, C., Roman, M., Cernuşcă-Miţariu, S., Coldea, L., Boța, G., & Burcea, C. (2014). THE CONCEPT OF WELLBEING IN RELATION TO HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE.

Sirgy, M. Joseph. 2021. ‘Effects of Demographic Factors on Wellbeing’. Pp. 129–54 in The Psychology of Quality of Life. Vol. 83, Social Indicators Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Soja, E.W. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Thomas, Gwenlli, Mary Lynch, and Llinos Haf Spencer. 2021. ‘A Systematic Review to Examine the Evidence in Developing Social Prescribing Interventions That Apply a Co-Productive, Co-Designed Approach to Improve Well-Being Outcomes in a Community Setting’. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(8):3896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083896.

Wolff, E., & Zacharias, A. (2003). Well-being in America: The Levy Institute measure of economic well-being. Indicators, 2(4), 44–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15357449.2003.11069178

Ксендзук, В. В., Власюк, Т. О., & Сергієнко, І. Г. (2023). Оцінка впливу наслідків війни на розвиток зовнішньої торгівлі товарами на урбанізованих територіях України. Економіка, управління та адміністрування, 3(105), 51–58.

Можаровська, Т. (2021). Психологічне благополуччя: теоретичні підходи до визначення поняття. Psychological Prospects Journal, 37, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-155-167

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliia Hodnieva, Katarína Melichová, Soňa Bellérová, Jana Kuffová Popovicsová