Perception of the Pregnant Women about the Nursing Care in the Prenatal Services
HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

prenatal health care
nursing care
obstetric nursing
patient’s satisfaction

How to Cite

Perception of the Pregnant Women about the Nursing Care in the Prenatal Services. (2018). Investigación En Enfermería Imagen Y Desarrollo, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie21-1.ptgc
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Introduction: The human care provided by the nurses is a determining factor in the promotion of the adherence to the prenatal control, which is necessary to improve the maternal-perinatal health. Objective: To describe the perception of pregnant women about the technical and cognitive competences and capability of the nursing professionals to provide a humanized health care during the prenatal services. Method: This work has a cross-sectional descriptive design using a sample of 150 pregnant women. They were recruited sequentially and based on some convenience factors, from four different health care centers belonging to a main hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. They were recruited between June and August 2013. In this process the professional health-care scale based on the theory Care for the Other’s Well-being was used, which allows to identify the technical and human care skills. Results: The professional health care was assessed as excellent. There are however some elements of the human care that should be highlighted: the ability to allow the expression of feelings; the listening and attention without reproaching or criticizing particular conditions in the women. These elements are valued positively and can modify their perception about the professional’s cognitive competence. Conclusions: These attributes of the human care can be determining factors for the adherence to the prenatal control; therefore, the public health professional should recognize their importance.

HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

1. Liu CM, Chang SD, Cheng PJ. Relationship between prenatal care and maternal complications in women with preeclampsia: Implications for continuity and discontinuity of prenatal care. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;51(4):576-82. https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2012.09.013.

2. Spears W, Hook L, Castillo J, Torres C. Initiation of and barriers to prenatal care use among low-income women in San Antonio, Texas. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14:133-40. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0419-0.

3. Sheeder J, Weber K, Kabir-greher K. A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:177-87. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0709-1

4. Jiménez Puñales S, Pentón Cortés RJ. Mortalidad perinatal: factores de riesgo asociados. Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet. 2013;42(1):2-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.gine.2013.05.003

5. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu a M, Khan-Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD000934. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.

6. Abu-Ghanem S, Sheiner E, Sherf M, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Shoham-Vardi I. Lack of prenatal care in a traditional community: Trends and perinatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(5):1237-42. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2153-x.

7. UNICEF. Estrategia de UNICEF en América Latina y el Caribe para contribuir a la reducción de la morbimortalidad materna, neonatal e infantil. 2011-2015 [internet]. 2013. Disponible en: https://www.unicef.org/lac/Estrategia_Mortalidad_Materna_Neonatal.pdf.

8. Duarte S, Oliveira de Andrade S, Mamede MV. Maternal decision on obtaining prenatal care: A study in Brazil. Midwifery. 2011;27:160-4. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2009.04.008

9. Mckinnon LC, Prosser SJ, Miller YD. What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [internet]. 2014;14(366). Disponible en: https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/366.

10. Huaman LS, Blumenthal P, Sarnquist CC. Factors influencing women’s decision to seek antenatal care in the Andes of Peru. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1112-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1113-9.

11. Morestin F, Bicaba A, Sermé JDD, Fournier P. Evaluating quality of obstetric care in low-resource settings: Building on the literature to design tailor-made evaluation instruments - an illustration in Burkina Faso. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(20). https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-20.

12. Hernández Betancur AM, Vásquez-Truisi ML. El cuidado de enfermería comprometido: motor en la satisfacción de la gestante durante el control prenatal. Univ Salud. 2015;17(1):80-96.

13. Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio MDP. Metodología de la investigación [internet]. 5a ed. México: McGraw Hill; 2014. Disponible en: https://www.casadellibro.com/libro-metodologia-de-la-investigacion-5-ed-incluye-cd-rom/9786071502919/1960006.

14. Vesga Gualdrón LM, Ruiz CH. Validez y confiabilidad de una escala de cuidado profesional en español. Av Enfemr. 2016;34(1):69-78. https://www.dx.doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v34n1.44488

15. Bassan H, Uliel-sibony S, Katsav S, Farber M, Tauman R. Maternal sleep disordered breathing and neonatal outcome. 2016;18(January):45-8.

16. de Figueiredo FP, Parada AP, Cardoso VC, Batista RFL, da Silva AAM, Barbieri MA, et al. Postpartum depression screening by telephone: a good alternative for public health and research. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(3):547-53. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-014-0480-1

17. Muñoz LA, Vollrath A, Bonatti C. Vivenciando la maternidad en contextos de vulnerabilidad social: un enfoque comprensivo de la fenomenología social. Rev Latino-Am Enferm [internet]. 2013;21(4). Disponible en: https://www.eerp.usp.br/rlae.

18. Groth SW, Holland ML. Eighteen years after pregnancy adolescent gestational weight gain still affects body mass index. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs [internet]. 2013;42(s1):S79-80. Disponible en: https://www.doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1552-6909.12168.

19. Fawcett J. Analisys and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge. 3a ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2013.

20. Martínez Ortega RM. El coeficiente de correlación de los rangos de Spearman caracterización. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2009;VIII(2):1-19.

21. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [internet]. [Citado 2015 jul 28]. Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/esp/poblacion-y-demografia/nacimientos-y-defunciones/118-demograficas/estadisticas-vitales/4647-nacimientos-2013.

22. Raine R, Cartwright M, Richens Y, Mahamed Z, Smith D. A qualitative study of women’s experiences of communication in antenatal care: Identifying areas for action. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(4):590-9. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0489-7.

23. Lawton R, Gardner P, Plachcinski R. Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: The role of outcome and relationship with the care provider. Heal Expect. 2011;14(3):296-306.

24. Ruwe M, Capitman J, Bengiamin M, Soto T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of racial disparities in prenatal care in California: How much? Does insurance matter? Soc Work Public Health. 2010;25(6):550-71.

25. Erol N, Durusoy R, Ergin I, Döner B, Ciçeklioğlu M. Unintended pregnancy and prenatal care: a study from a maternity hospital in Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15(4):290-300.

The journal Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.