Keywords
innovation
measurement scale
psychosocial factors
organizations
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the perception of factors of innovation in samples of experts and workers from Spain and Latin-America, using a scale based on meta-analytic evidence. The scale of collective behavior and attitudes favorable to innovation shows satisfactory reliability and criterion validity. Participants perceive that role, group, leadership, climate and psychological factors of innovations exist at a moderate level, while perceive that organizational structure of innovation are present at a lower extent. Valuation of innovation is perceived as higher than actual degree of it, and both valuation and frequency of innovation are perceived as higher in others organizations than in the organization to which participants belongs. Perceived level of innovation was strongly associated to organizational and role factors, and in a lower extent to leadership factors, while individual and group factors were less relevant, congruently with meta-analysis. Positive and innovative leadership play a meditational rol between organizational and role factors and innovation. Implications of results for organizations are discussed.
Aboal, D., Angelelli, P., Crespi, G., López, A., Vairo, M., & Pereschi, F. (2015). Innovación en Uruguay: diagnóstico y propuestas de políticas. Uruguay +25, (documento de trabajo Nº12). Fundación Astur: Red Sur. Recuperado de http://www.cinve.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Documento-de-Trabajo-11.pdf
Adamsky, D. (2010). The culture of military innovation, the impact of cultural factors on the revolution in military affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40 , 1297–1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 .
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Härtel, CH.E. (2014). Positive and negative affective climate and cultura: the good, the bad, and the ugly. En B. Schneider & K. Barbera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture (pp. 136-152). New York (USA): Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199860715.013.0008 .
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. BID (2011). La necesidad de innovar, el camino hacia el progreso de América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de http://craig.com.ar/biblioteca/La necesidad de innovar. Camino hacia el Progreso - BID.pdf
Barsade, M., Barsade, T., & Licina, G. (2012). Organizational Development. En M. Mumford, Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 667-703). London (UK): Elsevier.
Belbin, M. (2011). Equipos directivos, el por qué de su éxito o fracaso . Londres (UK): Elsevier.
Benito, S., Platero, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2012). Factores determinantes de la innovación en las microempresas españolas: la importancia de los factores internos. Universia Business Review, 33 , 104-121.
Binnewies, C., & Gromer, M. (2012). Creativity and innovation at work: The role of work characteristics and personal initiative. Psicothema, 24 , 100-105.
Bowen, F.E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is everything: a meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63 , 1179-1185.
Bureau of European Policy Advises (BEPA) (2011). Empowering people, driving change: social innovation in the European Unión . Luxembourg: European Communities.
Buffet, M.A., Gervais, R.L., Liddle M., & Eeckelaert, L. (2013). Well-being at work: creating a positive work environment. Literature Review. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Recuperado de https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/literature_reviews/well-being-at-work-creating-a-positivework-environment
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: final report in the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. JRC scientific and technical reports: European commission . Recuperado de http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC62370.pdf
Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. The American Economic Review, 89 (1), 306-318.
Cameron, K., & Spreitzer, G. (Ed.) (2012). The Oxford handbook of positve organizational scholarship . New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
Camisón, C., & Boronat, M. (2010). Estructuras organizativas, estrategias competitivas y ventajas estratégicas de las pyme. Mercados globalizados. Economía Industrial, 375 , 89-100.
Cañibano, C., & Castro, E. (2010). El sistema español de innovación. En CSIC-UPV, Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento . Working paper 2010/09. Recuperado de http://www.ingenio.upv.es/sites/default/files/working-paper/el_sistema_espa_ol_de_innovaci_n.pdf
Caprile, M. (Coord.) (2012). Meta-analysis of gender and science research: synthesis report . Brussels: European Commision. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/index.cfm?pg=library&lib=gender_equality .
Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 , 521-551.
Confederación empresarial de Madrid-CEOE (CEIM) (2015). Memoria de la confederación. Recuperado de http://www.ceim.es/upload/file/publicaciones/memoria2015/ceim-2015-memoria.html
Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 , 604-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002 .
Cooper, A., Dunkelberg, W., & Woo, C. (1988). Entrepreneurs´perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3 (2), 97-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90020-1
Cotec (2016). Informe Cotec 2016: Innovación en España . Recuperado de http://cotec.es/informe-cotec/
Crespi, G., Navarro, J.C., & Zúñiga, P. (2010). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina y el Caribe: un compendio estadístico de indicadores. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). Recuperado de http://www.iadb.org/es/temas/competitividad-tecnologia-e-innovacion/publicaciones-e-investigacion,7758.html
Crespi, G., & Zúñiga, P. (2010). Innovation and productivity: evidence from six Latin American countries. IBD working paper. Recuperado de http://www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubIDB-WP-218.pdf
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Fluir en los negocios: liderazgo y creación en el mundo de la empresa . Barcelona (BC): Kairós.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2011). Creatividad, el fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención . Barcelona (BC): Paidós.
da Costa, S., Páez, D., Oriol, X., & Unzueta, C. (2014). Regulación de la afectividad en el ámbito laboral: validez de las escalas de heteroregulación EROS y EIM. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30 , 13-22. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2014a2
da Costa, S., Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Garaigordobil, M., & Gondim, S. (2015). Personal factors of creativity: a second order meta-analysis. Journal of work and organizational Psychology , 31, 165-173.: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.06.002
da Costa, S., Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Gondim, S., & Rodríguez, M. (2014). Factores favorables a la innovación en las organizaciones: una integración de meta-análisis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30 , 67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2014.06.006
da Costa, S., Páez, D., Hermosilla, D., Gondim, S., Oriol, X., Rodríguez, M.,… Torres, A. (junio de 2016). Percepción de liderazgo e innovación en las organizaciones: dos estudios . Trabajo presentado en el Congreso Internacional de Psicología del Trabajo y Recursos Humanos. Madrid, España.
da Costa, S., Páez, D., & Sánchez, F. (julio de 2016). Creatividad y bienestar en contextos de trabajo. En S. Gondim, X. Oriol, & S. da Costa. Simposio: regulaçao, criatividade e bem-estar: explorando perspectivas de abordagem em contextos de trabalho y deportivos . Simposio llevado a cabo en el Congreso VII CBPOT, Brasilia.
da Costa, S., Sánchez, F., & Páez, D. (2016). Confianza en las organizaciones y su relación con la creatividad y la innovación percibida. En M. Bargsted., H. Acosta., C.M. Alcover & S. da Costa. Simposio: Confianza en las organizaciones: antecedentes de su impacto en el comportamiento organizacional a nivel de equipos y personas y su relación con la cultura organizacional y la innovación. Congreso Internacional de Psicología del Trabajo y Recursos humanos . Celebrado en Madrid, España los días 2 y 3 de junio de 2016. Presentación no publicada.
Damanpour, F., & Aaravind, D. (2012), Organizational structure and innovation revisited from organic to ambidextrous structure. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 483-513). London: Academic Press.
Davis-Blake, A., & Broschak, J. (2009). Outsourcing and the changing nature of work. Annual Review of Sociology, 35 , 321-340.
De Neys, W. (2010). Heuristic bias, conflict, and rationality in decision-making. En B.M. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. von Müller (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking (pp. 22-33). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Departamento de Educación, Política Lingüística y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco (Hezkuntza). Formación e innovación. (2012) ¿Hacia dónde va la innovación? Programa de Gobierno 2012-2016, Plan Heziberri, 2020 y otros . Recuperado de http://www.hezkuntza.ejgv.euskadi.eus/r43-2459/es/contenidos/informacion/dig/es_presenta/presentacion.html
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2015). The global innovation index: effective innovation policies for development, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva . Recuperado de https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf
European Union (EU), política regional (2009). Creatividad e innovación, motor de competitividad en las regiones. Panorama inforegio, 29 , 3-29.
European commission (2015). En Innovation Union a Europe 2020 iniciative. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=keydocs
European Commission (EC) (2016). European innovation scoreboard . Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
European Union (EU) (2016). Europe 2020 indicators, research and development. Eurostat Statistics Explained . Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Europe_2020_indicators_-_research_and_development
European Commission (EC) (2017). Entrepreneurship in Education. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/entrepreneurship_en
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Richard, N. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of innovation . New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
Faleg, G. (2016). The implications of Brexit for the EU´s common security and defense policity . Recuperado de https://www.ceps.eu/publications
Fiedler, K., & von Sydow, M. (2015). Heuristics and biases: beyond tversky and Kahneman´s (1974) judgment under uncertainty. In M.W. Eysenck & D. Groome, Cognitive psychology: revisiting the classical studies (pp. 146-161). Los Angeles (UK): Sage.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics . London: Sage Publications.
Flintrop, J., & Vargas, O. (2014). Psychosocial risk in Europe: prevalence and strategies for prevention . Luxembourg: EU-OSHA. Recuperado de https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/reports/psychosocial-risks-eu-prevalence-strategies-prevention/view
Foley, R. (2012). A case study in horizontal military innovation: the german army, 1916-1918. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 35 (6), 799-827.
Ford, C.M., & Sullivan, D.M. (2004). A time for everything: how the timing of novel contributions influences proyect team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (2), 279-292.
Fundación Botín. (2012). Good morning creativity! Awakening human potential through education . (Botín Foundation report). Recuperado de http://www.centrobotin.org/oedihg287ddy278_uploads/web_1/personales/Creatividad/buenosdiascreatividad.pdf Fun
Fundación Botín. (2014). Artes y emociones que potencian la creatividad . (Informe Fundación Botín). Recuperado de http://www.centrobotin.org/oedihg287ddy278_uploads/web_1/personales/Creatividad/2014 Informe Creatividad ES.pdf
Garaigordobil, M. (2003). Intervención psicológica para desarrollar la personalidad infantil: juego, conducta prosocial y creatividad . Madrid: Pirámide.
Gardner, H., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Buen trabajo: cuando ética y excelencia convergen . Barcelona: Paidós.
Generalitat de Catalunya (Gencat) (2012). La innovació a l`empresa . Recuperado dehttp://inicia.gencat.cat/inicia/es/innovacio.do
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decisión making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62 , 451-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 .
Gondim, S., Loiola, E., Andrade de Morais, F., da Costa, S., Páez, D., Rodriguez, M.,… Mourao, L. (2015). Creativity and innovation as defined by workers. REAd, 82 (3), 549-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.0162015.55629
González, J.L., Navarro, M., & Peña, I. (2010). Internacionalización de empresas innovadoras jóvenes en España. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19 (2), 61-82.
González, J.L., & Peña. I. (2007). Determinantes de la capacidad de innovación de los negocios emprendedores en España. Economía Industrial, 363 , 129-147.
Hammond, M., Neff, N., Farr, J., Schwall, A., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of Individual-Level Innovation at Work: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5 , 90–105, http://dx.doi.org/10.103720018556 .
Hennesey, B., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology , 61 , 569-598. http://dx.doi.org/0.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2013). Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes , 22 , 11-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-66
Hermosilla, D., Amutio, A., da Costa, S., & Páez, D. (2016). El liderazgo transformacional en las organizaciones: variables mediadoras y consecuencias a largo plazo. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 32 (3), 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.06.003
Horowitz, M. (2010). Nostate actors and the diffusion of innovations: the case of suicide terrorism. International Organization, 64 (1), 33-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990233
Hubert, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: social innovation in the European Union . Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/librarydoc/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union
Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. (2007). A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: an opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16 (3), 299-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x
Huhtala, M., Kangas, M., Lämsä, A.M., & Feldt, T. (2013). Ethical managers in ethical organizations? The leadership-culture connection among Finnish managers. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34 (3), 250-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731311326684
Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 , 1128-1145. http://dx.doi.org/103720015978 .
Hunter, S., Bedell, K., & Mumford, M.D. (2007). Climate for creativity: a quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19 , 69-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410709336883 .
IBM (2016). Guía breve de IBM SPSS statistics 22 . Recuperado de ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/22.0/es/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Brief_Guide.pdf
Instituto Nacional de la juventud (Injuve) (2015). Education a policy Outlook 2015 . Recuperado de http://www.injuve.es/observatorio/noticia/education-policy-outlook-2015#sthash.n2BJg4us.dpuf
Innobasque (Berrikuntzaren euskal agenzia / agencia vasca de la innovación) (2016). Plan de Ciencia, tecnología e innovación 2020 . Recuperado de https://www.irekia.euskadi.eus/uploads/attachments/5585/PCTI_Euskadi_2020.pdf
Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a Special Issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 , 129–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.242 .
Jiménez, S., & Bruzzo, S. (2016). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación para el desarrollo. Serie informe económico , 256 , 1-29. Recuperado de http://lyd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/SIE-256-Ciencia-Tecnologia-e-Innovacion-para-el-desarrollo-Abril2016.pdf
Jordan, J. (2015). Cultura organizativa e innovación militar: el caso de las fuerzas de defensa de Israel. Estudios de seguridad nacional, 1 (1), 17-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.18847/1.1.2
Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio . Barcelona (ES): Debate.
Landström, H., & Lohke, F. (Eds.) (2010). Historical foundations of entrepreneurial research . Cheltenham (UK): EE.
Larracoechea, I. (27 de octubre de 2013). La innovación como motor de la recuperación. Diario El País . Recuperado el 27 de octubre de 2013 de http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2013/10/25/actualidad/1382698176_594293.html
Ma, H. (2009). The Effect Size of Variables Associated With Creativity: A Meta-Analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21 , 30-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633400
Noe, R., Clarke, A., & Klein, H. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psycholy and Organizational Behavior, 1 , 245-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and corporate change, 14 (3), 419-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth058
Miller, R., Mark, N., & Michaelson, J. (2008). Innovation and well-being . (Innovation Index working paper) NESTA. Recuperado de https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/kcfinder/files/6.2.InnovationandWellbeingMilleretal.pdf
Ministerio da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações (Mincyt). (2013). Estratègia Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Inovaçao 2016-2019 . Recuperado de http://www.mcti.gov.br/publicacoes
Ministerio de Ciencia, tecnología e innovación productiva (Mincyt). Presidencia de la nación (2015). Plan en acción “Argentina innovadora 2020” . Recuperado de http://www.mincyt.gob.ar/informes/plan-en-accion-argentina-innovadora-2020-11634
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Mineco). (2013) Estrategia española de ciencia y tecnología y de innovación 2013-2020 . Recuperado de http://www.idi.mineco.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Investigacion/FICHEROS/Estrategia_espanola_ciencia_tecnologia_Innovacion.pdf
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change . London: Academic Press.
Mumford, M., Hester, K.S., & Robledo, I.C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: importance and approaches. En M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3-16). London: Elsevier.
Naciones Unidas/UNDP/Unesco (2014). Creative economy report 2013 special edition, widening local development pathways . Recuperado de http://www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/creative-economy-report-2013.pdf .
Navarro, J.C., & Olivares, J. (2016). La política de innovación en América Latina y el Caribe, nuevos caminos . Washington, DC: BID. Recuperado de http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/bitstream/handle/123456789/4604/LapolíticadeinnovaciónenAméricaLatinayelCaribenuevoscaminos.pdf?sequence=1
O`Boile, E.H., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J.M., Hawver, T.H., & Story, P.A. (2011). The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 3 2, 788-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.714 .
Oriol, X., Amutio, A., Mendoza, M., da Costa, S., & Miranda, R. (2016). Emotional creativity as predictor of intrinsic motivation and academic engagement in university students: the mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology . http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243
Ortiz, S., Navarro, C., García, E., Ramis, C., & Manassero, A. (2012). Validación de la versión española de la escala de trabajo emocional de Frankfurt. Psicothema, 24 (2), 337-342.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Oslo Manual: Guideliness for collecting and interpreting innovation data . OECD/EC.
Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Everyday innovation, how the enhance innovative working employees and organizations . (Research report). Nesta. Recuperado de https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/everyday_innovation.pdf
Pelkmans, J., & Renda, A. (2014). Does EU regulation hinder or stimulate innovation? Centre for European Policity Studies. Brussels, Belgium. Recuperado de https://www.ceps.eu/publications/does-eu-regulation-hinder-or-stimulate-innovation
Peña-Sarrionandia, A., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J.J. (2015). Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 , 160, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00160
Pisano, U., Lange, L., & Berger, G. (2015). Social innovation in Europe: an overview of the concept of social innovation in the context of European initiatives and practices. ESDN Quarterly Report, 36 . Recuperado de http://www.sd-network.eu/quarterly%20reports/report%20files/pdf/2015-April-Social_Innovation_in_Europe.pdf
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods , 40 , 879–891.
Plan Uruguay 2015-2020 (2015). Vamos Uruguay . Recuperado de http://plan.vamosuruguay.com/
Revelle, W. (2016). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. (R package version 1.6.4.) [Computer Software]. North Western University, Evanston. Recuperado de http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/ .
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: coments on sijtsma. Psychometrika , 74, 145-154. http://dx.doi.org/0.1007/S11336-008-9102-Z
Prieto, L., Lamarca, R., & Casado. A. (1998). La evaluación de la fiabilidad en las observaciones clínicas: el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Medicina clínica, 110 (4), 142-145.
Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let´s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners´ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational psychology, 16 (4), 353-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701595438 .
Riivari, E., Lämsä, A., Kujala, J., & Heiskanen, E. (2012). The ethical cultura of organisations and organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5 (3), 310-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061211243657 .
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2013). Comportamiento organizacional . New Jersey (NJ): Pearson.
Robbins, S, & Judge,T. (2016). Essentials of organizational behavior . England (UK): Pearson Education.
Robbins, S. (2008). Fundamentos do comportamento organizacional . Sao Paulo (SP): Pearson.
Rosenbusch, N. Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (4), 441-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
Romero, M.J. (2014). El impacto económico de la innovación: 10 razones por las que innovar . Madrid: Clarke, Modet & Co.
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 , 59-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
Sánchez Bueno, M.J. (2008). El proceso innovador y tecnológico: estrategias y apoyo público . La Coruña: Netbiblo.
Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: a meta-analysis of organizational, cultural and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30 , 714-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003
Scarpinelli, L. (2013, septiembre 15). Innovación y desarrollo: contradicciones en la política oficial. Diario La Nación . Recuperado de http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1619890-contradicciones-en-la-politica-oficial
Scott, R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests . Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications.
Schumacher, E.G., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). Institutionalizing ethical innovation in organizations: an integrated causal model of moral innovation decision processes. Journal Buiness Ethics, 113 (1), 15-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1277-7 .
Sistema integrado de información sobre investigación científica, desarrollo tecnológico e innovación (SIICyT). (2013) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013-2018 . Recuperado de http://pnd.gob.mx/
Song, M., Podoynitsyna, K., Van Der Bij, H., & Halman, J. (2008), Success Factors in New Ventures: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 , 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00280.x
Unesco (2016). Revisión comparativa de iniciativas nacionales de aprendizaje móvil en América Latina. Los casos de Colombia, Costa Rica, Perú y Uruguay . Paris (FR): ONU.
Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Rajmil, L., Rebollo, P., Permanyer-Miralda. G., Quintana, J., Santed, R., Valderas, J., Rivera, A., Domingo-Salvany, A. & Alonso, J. (2005). El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos. The Spanish version of the Short Form 36 Health Survey: a decade of experience and new developments. Gac Sanit , 19 (2), 135-50.
Villamizar, G. (2012). La creatividad desde la perspectiva de estudiantes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana sobre calidad, eficacia y cambio en la educación, 10 (2), 213-237.
Vera-Calzaretta, A., Carrasco-Dajer, C., da Costa, S., & Páez, D. (2015). Factores psicosociales del presentismo en trabajadores del sistema de salud chileno. Journal of work and organizational psychology, 31 , 119-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.03.004
von Sydow, M., & Braus, N. (2016). On the Tragedy of Personnel Evaluation. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J.C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, At (Pitsburgh), Volume: (pp. 105-110). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural ecuation modeling . Chichester (UK): John Wiley y Sons, Ltda.
Watson, J., & Everett, J. (1996). Small business failure rates: choice of definition and the size effect. The Journal of Entrepreneurial and Small Business Finance, 5 (3), 271-285.
West, M.A., & Farr, J.L. (Eds.) (2009). Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies . Chillester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
Yesil, S., & Sozbilir, F. (2013). An empirical investigation into the impact of personality on individual innovation behavior in the workplace. Social and behavioral science, 81 , 540-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.474
Zhao, H., Scott, S., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36 (2), 381-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335187
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.