Keywords
Armed Conflict
Psychosocial Consequences
coping strategies
Reparation
Women
How to Cite
Abstract
The armed conflict in Colombia has gone on for fifty years and produced numerous victims. Women make up a collective that has been especially affected and made invisible by the violence. Based on 935 interviews of Colombian women (17-83 years) belonging to different ethnic communities (who had identified themselves as mixed-race, afro-americans, indigenous or whits), the present study explores the Human Rights violations they experienced, the psychosocial impact of these violations, the strategies the women used to cope with the violence, and the measures they consider valuable to redress the damage inflicted. Using a feminist methodological perspective (Harding, 1987), data collection was carried out by women interviewing other women who wanted to bring back often invisibilized experiences of violence and thus contribute to their collective learning and empowerment process. This they were to do as from a shared redefinition of the facts. The instrument used included study methods used in other contexts of human rights violations (Arnoso, Beristain & Ginzález Hidalgo, 2014; Beristain, 2009) and the answers were coded for further quantitative and qualitative treatment. A relationship was found between the different types of violence and the regions the sample came from, with indigenous and Afro-American women affected more negatively by the conflict. The results indicate that the paramilitary groups were the agents identified most often as the perpetrators of the violence.
ABColombia, Sisma Mujer, & US Office (2013). Colombia: mujeres, violencia sexual en el conflicto y el proceso de paz. London: ABColombia.
Afonso, C. & Beristain, C.M. (2013). Memoria para a vida. Una comisión de la verdad desde las mujeres para Colombia. Bilbao: HEGOA.
Amnistía Internacional. (2004). Cuerpos marcados, crímenes silenciados. Violencia sexual contra las mujeres en el marco del conflicto armado. Madrid: EDAI.
Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas [ACNUR] (febrero 28, 2005). Naciones Unidas, Informe de la Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en Colombia, E/CN.4/2005/10.
Arnoso, M., Beristain, C., & González-Hidalgo, E. (2014). Collective memory and human rights violations in the Western Sahara: Impact, coping, and demands for reparation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(4), 552-573.
Bar-Tal, D. & Bennink, G. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
Basoglu, M., Mineka, S., Paker, M., Aker, T., Livanou, M., & Gok, S. (1997). Psychological preparedness for trauma as a protective factor in survivors of torture. Psychological Medicine, 27, 1421-1433.
Becker, D., & Lira, E. (1989). Derechos humanos: todo es según el dolor con que se mira. Santiago de Chile: ILAS.
Bello, M. N. (2004). Desplazamiento forzado. Dinámicas de guerra, exclusión y desarraigo. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Beristain, C. (2009). Diálogos sobre la reparación. Qué reparar en los casos de violaciones de derechos humanos. Quito: Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos.
Blanco, A., Díaz, D., & García del Soto, A. (2006). Recovering the context in posttraumatic stress disorder: The psychosocial trauma in victims of political violence and terrorism. Estudios de Psicología, 27, 333-350.
Boehnlein, J., Kinzie, D., Sekiya, U., Riley, C., Pou, K., & Rosborough, B. (2004). A ten-year treatment outcome study of traumatized Cambodian refugees. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 192(10), 658-663.
Bojholm, S., Foldspang, A., Juhler, M., Kastrup, M., Skylv, G., & Somnier, F. (1992). Monitoring the health and rehabilitation of torture survivors. Copenhagen: The Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims.
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica [CNMH] (2013). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: memoria de guerra y dignidad. Bogotá: Pro-Off Set.
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica [CNMH] (2016a). El derecho a la justicia como garantía de no repetición. Las víctimas y las antesalas de la justicia. Bogotá: Autor.
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica [CNMH] (2016b). Hasta encontrarlos. El drama de la desaparición forzada en Colombia. Bogotá: Autor.
Chirot, D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2001). Ethnopolitical warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions. Washington, D. C.: APA Press.
Doise, W., Spini, D., & Clèmence A. (1998). Human rights studied as a social representation in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1-29.
Fazel, M., Wheeler, J., & Danesh, J. (2005). Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in Western countries: A systematic review. Lancet, 365, 1309-1314.
Gibson, J. L. (2004). Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
González, L. (2015). El paramilitarismo en Colombia. In C. E. Espitia (Coord.), En la ruta hacia la paz. Debates hacia el fin del conflicto y la paz duradera (pp. 197-211). Bogotá: Centro de Memoria, Paz y Reconciliación.
Grupo de Memoria Histórica [GMH]. (2010). La masacre de Bahía Portete. Mujeres Wayuu en la mira. Bogotá: Taurus, Semana.
Harding, S. (1987). The metod question. Hypatia, 2(3), 19-35.
Kelman, H. C. (2005). Building trust among enemies: The central challenge for international conflict resolution. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 639-650.
Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos D., & Kersner, D. (1995). La impunidad: Una perspectiva psicosocial y clínica. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
Mackenzie, M. (2010). Securitizing Sex? Towards a Theory of the Utility of Wartime Sexual Violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(2), 202-21.
Malley-Morrison, K., Mercurio, A., & Twose, G. (2013). International handbook of peace and reconciliation. New York: Springer.
Marshall, G. N., Schell, T. L., Elliott, M. N., Berthold, S. M., & Chun, C. A. (2005). Mental health of Cambodian refugees 2 decades after resettlement in the United States. Jama, 294(5), 571-579.
Nesiah, V. (2006). Comisiones de la verdad y género: principios, políticas y procedimientos. Nueva York: Centro Internacional para la Justicia Transicional.
Punamaki-Gitai, R. L. (1990). Political violence and psychosocial responses: A study of Palestinian women, children and ex-prisoners. Finland: Tampere Peace Research Institute.
Reis, C., Ahmed, A., Amowitz, L., Kushner, A., Elahi, M., & Iacopino V. (2004). Physician participation in human rights abuses in southern Iraq. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1480-1486.
Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
Unifem (2005). Género, desplazamiento y refugio. Frontera Colombia y Venezuela. Bogotá: Acnur.
Viñar, M. (2005). The specificity of torture as trauma: The human wilderness when words fail International. Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 311-333.
Vojvoda, D., Weine, S. M., McGlashan, T., Becker, D. F., & Southwick, S. M. (2008). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in Bosnian refugees 3 1/2 years after resettlement. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, & Development, 45(3), 421-426.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.