Keywords
Tower of Hanoi Task
gestures-speech mismatches
multimodal development
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this research was to study the planning of the execution of the Tower of Hanoï task (TOH) through gesture and speech. The effects of age and task complexity on gestures-speech mismatches were analyzed in 144 participants (48 children from 8 to 10 years old, 48 adolescents from 12 to 14 years old, and 48 adults from 18 to 20 years old) during their early explanations of the solution to the problem of the TOH. Results suggested effects from task complexity but not from age. Gesture-speech mismatches could be a possible way to analyze early explanations of the tasks, and the level of difficulty could be considered as a developmental indicator. The question of the relationship between gestures and speech during the planning of complex problems is in fact at the center of a passionate debate on the close relationship between thought and language. It is also at the heart of research on multimodal communication and thinking, according to which human cognition is based on verbal and nonverbal aspects of communicative behavior.
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Transitions in learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523.
Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, B. R., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson, C., & Knuth, E. J. (2014). How Teachers Link Ideas in Mathematics Instruction Using Speech and Gesture: A Corpus Analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65-100.
Alibali, M. W., Church, R. B., Kita, S., & Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Embodied knowledge in the development of conservation of quantity: evidence from gesture. In L. Edwards, F. Ferrara, & D. Moore-Russo (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. Cognition, Equity & Society: International Perspectives (pp. 27-49). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem Solving and Learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35-44.
Anderson, V. A. (1998). Assessing executive functions in children: biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 8(3), 319-49.
Anderson, J. R., & Douglas, S. (2001). Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the Cost of Goal Retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1331-1346.
Arán, V. (2011). Funciones ejecutivas en niños escolarizados: efectos de la edad y del estrato socioeconómico. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 29(1), 98-113.
Barceló, E., Lewis, S., & Moreno, M. (2006). Funciones ejecutivas en estudiantes universitarios que presentan alto y bajo rendimiento académico. Psicología desde el Caribe,18, 109-138.
Barroso-Martin, J. M., & León-Carrión, J. (2002). Funciones ejecutivas: control, planificación y organización del conocimiento. Revista de Psicología general y aplicada, 55(1), 27-44.
Blaye, A., & Chevalier, N. (2014). Contrôle exécutif et développement. Psychologie française, 59(1), 1-3.
Beilock, S. L, & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gestures changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1605-1610.
Berger, R. M., Guilford. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1957). A Factor-Analytic Study of Planning Abilities. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 71(6), 1-31.
Byrnes, M. N., & Spitz, H. H. (1979). Developmental progression of performance on the Tower of Hanoï problem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14(5), 379-381.
Clément, E., & Richard, J-F. (1997). Knowledge of domain effects in problem representation: the case of the Tower of Hanoi isomorphs. Thinking and Reasoning, 3(2), 133-157.
Chevalier, N. (2010). Les fonctions exécutives chez l’enfant: concepts et développement. Canadian Psychology, 51(3), 149-163.
Cook, S. W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2009). Embodied communication: Speaker’s gestures affect listeners’ actions. Cognition, 113(1), 98-104.
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2016). Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(2), 257-270.
Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23(1), 43-71.
De Luca, C. R., Wood, S. J., Anderson, V., Buchanan, J. A., Proffitt, T. M., Mahony, K., & Pantelis, C. (2003). Normative data from the CANTAB: I. Development of executive function over the lifespan. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(2), 242-254.
Díaz, A., Martín, R., Jiménez, J. E., García, E., Hernández, S., & Rodríguez, C. (2012). Torre de Hanoi: datos normativos y desarrollo evolutivo de la planificación. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 5(1), 79-91.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-68.
Egan, D. E., & Greeno, J. G. (1973). Acquiring cognitive structure by discovery and rule learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 85-97.
Ekman., P, & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of non-verbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49-98.
Garber, P. (1997). Using gesture and speech to index understanding of a problem solving task: A comparative study of adults and children explaining the Tower of Hanoi puzzle (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Garber, P., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Gesture offers insight into problem-solving in adults and children. Cognitive Science, 26, 817-831.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action's influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664-674.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning though gesture. Advanced Review, 2(6), 595-607.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257-283.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). From action to abstraction: Gesture as a mechanism of change. Developmental review, 38, 167-184.
Hugues, C., & Graham, C. (2002). Measuring Executives Functions in Childhood: Problems and Solutions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 131-142.
Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M. (2017). How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245-266.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
McNeill, D. (2005). Gestures and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.
Miyake, A., Friedman P. N., Emerson, M. J., Witski, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100.
Monette, S., & Bigras, M. (2008). La mesure des fonctions exécutives chez les enfants d’âge préscolaire. Psychologie canadienne, 49(4), 323-341.
Mumford D. M., Schultz A.R., & Van Doorn, R. J. (2001). Performance in Planning: Processes, Requirements, and Errors. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 213-240.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Gesture as representational action: A paper about function. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(3), 652-665.
Osburn., H. K & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and Planning: Training Interventions to Develop Creative Problem-Solving Skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 173-190.
Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3(4), 359-400.
Perry, M., & Elder, A. D. (1997). Knowledge in transition: adults’ developing understanding of a principle of physical causality. Cognitive Development, 12(1), 131-157.
Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris: PUF.
Reed, S. (1999). Cognition : théories et applications. Paris: De Boek.
Richard, J. F. (1982). Planification et organisation des actions dans la résolution du problème de la Tour de Hanoï par des enfants de 7 ans. L’année psychologique, 82(2), 307-336.
Richard, J. F. (1988). Les activités de planification chez l'enfant. Revue française de pédagogie, 82(1), 33-37.
Richard, J. F. (1997). La résolution de problèmes. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 50, 47-54.
Richard J. F. (2004). Les activités mentales. Paris: Armand Colin.
Rönnlund, M., Lövdén, M., & Lars-Göran, N. (2001). Adult age differences in Tower of Hanoi Performance: Influence from demographic and cognitive variables. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8(4), 269-283.
Trofatter, C., Kontra, C., Beilock, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Gesturing has a larger impact on problem-solving than action, even when action is accompanied by words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(3), 251-260.
Welsh, M. C. (1991). Rule-Guided Behavior and Self-Monitoring on the Tower of Hanoi Disk-Transfer Task. Cognitive Development, 6(1), 59-76.
Welsh, M. C., Penington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991). A normative developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7(2), 131-149.
Welsh, M. C., Satterlee-Cartmell, T., & Stine, M. (1999). Towers of Hanoi and London: Contribution of Working Memory and Inhibition to Performance. Brain and Cognition, 41(2), 231-242.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.