Abstract
This experimental study, in which 118 university students participated, addresses how environmental and altruistic cues induce energy-saving behavior and intention, and their interaction with environmental and altruistic values, thus testing the influence of context or situational variables in energy-saving behavior and intention. Additionally, it does an empirical approach to the role that environmental and altruistic values may have as individual predictors of energy-saving. Environmental and altruistic situational cues are operationalized by environment and altruism conceptual priming. The results reveal an interaction between situational variables and personal values: environment priming induced more energy-saving behavior among individuals with lower altruistic values. The same effect is not observed for energy-saving intention. When the environment and altruism priming were present, individuals with lower altruistic values had less energy-saving intentions. These results underline the importance of distinguishing environmental and altruistic frames and motives when explaining energy-saving behavior.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. Rudd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505283421
Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, R., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495
Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 464-478.
Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behaviour: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00105-6
Coelho, J. A., Gouveia, V. V., & Milfont, T. L. (2006). Valores humanos como explicadores de atitudes ambientais e intenção de comportamento pró-ambiental. Psicologia em Estudo, 11(1), 199-207.
Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 832-848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972829
DeGroot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behaviour: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
DeGroot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
Drijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J. A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(5), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1427
Drijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behaviour expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behaviour. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80003-4
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 335-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behaviour relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595275005
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004
Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2004). Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: The role of values and attitude strength. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2524-9
Howell, R. A. (2013). “It’s not (just) the environment, stupid!” Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.015
Howes, Y., & Gifford, R. (2009). Stable or dynamic value importance? The interaction between value endorsement level and situational differences on decision-making in environmental issues. Environment and Behavior, 41(4), 549-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318146
Jakovcevic, A., Díaz-Marín, J., Moreno, C., Geiger, S., & Tonello, G. (2013). Valores y cuidado de la energía: Implicancias para la educación ambiental en Argentina y Colombia. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i3.1481
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Environment & Behavior, 28(1), 111-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596281006
Kempton, W., Darley, J. M., & Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological research for the new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1213-1223.
Lima, M. L., Marques, S., & Moreira, S. (2012). “A house in the woods”: Values, attitudes and behaviours towards forests. Psyecology, 2, 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119711794394662
López, M. J., Álvarez, P., González, E., & García, M. J. (2015). Medidas del comportamiento ecológico y antecedentes: conceptualización y validación empírica de escalas. Universitas Psychologica, 14(1), 189-204.https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-1.mcea
Maio. G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behaviour. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283-308). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_12
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237244
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9
Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can Psychology help? American Psychologist, 55(5), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.496
Ramos, A. (2006). Social values dynamics and socio-economic development. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.5.1.35/1
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behaviour. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behaviour: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198294003
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005001
Spence, A., Leygue, C., Bedwell, B., & O’Malley, C. (2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behaviour? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1660-1672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W. , Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework to encouraging pro-environmental behaviour. The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723-743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595276001
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2017). Sustainable behavior and quality of life. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 173-184). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_9
van de Ven, D. J., González-Eguino, M., & Arto, I. (2018). The potential of behavioural change for climate change mitigation: A case study for the European Union. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23(6), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9763-y
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effect of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434
Vining, J. & Ebreo, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behaviour. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541-558). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Vlek, C., & Steg, L. (2007). Human behaviour and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces, and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x
Walther, E., Müller, D., & Schott, O. (2001). Automatisches soziales verhalten: Wie wirkt sich die aktivierung der konzepte egoismus und altruismus auf hilfeleistung aus? Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(3), 248-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.3.248
Wu, D. W., DiGiacomo, A., & Kingstone, A. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053856
Yavuzer, H., İşmen-Gazıoğlu, E., Yildiz, A., Demir, I. Mesici, F., Kiliçaslan, A., & Sertelin, Ç. (2006). The teacher altruism scale: Development, validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(3), 964-972.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.