Abstract
A heavy load of blame, hostility, and violence typifies the relationships between Jews and Arabs in Israel for nearly two centuries in a row. The present study is an exploratory experimental attempt, within the framework of Functional Measurement, to examine the viability of empathy as a means to facilitate a positive shift in functional cognitive schemata of helping. The participants, 143 Jewish and Arab (57 and 86, respectively) female students, were sampled from an Israeli academic college, where the Jews-Arabs ratio is nearly 50-50. Each Participant met individually 4-8 times, once a week, with a same sex and same age experimenter (another student). Each experimental session included a conversation where the experimenter approached the participant empathetically for approximately 15-20 minutes and asked her repeatedly to imagine a series of meetings between two female students (Jews and Arabs in all combinations) where one such protagonist attempts to receive form the other (Jew or Arab) lesson notes. This manipulation was arranged within the framework of a bi-factorial model, that isi.e., the level of needs of both protagonists (3 x 3). In each such encounter the participant was asked to estimate the likelihood that the imagined request will be fulfilled. The results show that serial exposure to empathy affected positively mainly Jewish students. The relevance of the findings to the notion of 'functional social cognition' and to the body of knowledge which deals with majority-minority relations is pointed at.
Anderson, N. H. (1991a). Contributions to Information Integration Theory. Vol. 2: Social . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (1991b). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to Information Integration Theory (Vol. 2., pp. 243-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (2001). Empirical direction in design and analysis . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified Social Cognition . New York: Psychology Press.
Anderson, N. H. (2013) Unified psychology based on three laws of information integration. Review of General Psychology . 17 , 125-132.
Angus, L., & Hardtke, K. (2006). Insight and story change in brief experiential therapy for depression: An intensive narrative process analysis. In L. Castonguay & C. Hill (Eds.), Insight and Psychotherapy (pp. 187-280). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management , 9 , 22-50.
Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology , 21 , 351-365.
Berger, D. M. (1984). On the way to the empathic understanding. American Journal of Psychotherapy , 38 , 111-120.
Billikopf, G. (2004). Empathic listening and challenging perceptions. In G. Billikopf (Ed.), Helping others resolve conflicts: Empowering stakeholders (pp. 25-30). California: Regents of the University of California.
Buie, D. H. (1981). Empathy: its nature and limitations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association , 29 , 281-307.
Castonguay, L. G. (2005). Training issues in psychotherapy integration commentary. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration , 15 , 384-391.
Castonguay, L. G., & Hill, C. (2006). Insight and Psychotherapy (Eds). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., & Luce, C. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology , 73 , 481-494.
Deutsch, K. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area . New Jersey: Princeton University.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Flores Neimann, Y., & Sneider, K. (2001). Racial, ethnic and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues , 57 , 167-188.
Goldfried, M. R. (2003). Cognitive-Behavior therapy: Reflections on the evolution of a therapeutic orientation. Cognitive Therapy and Research , 27 , 53-69.
Graziano, W. G., M. M,. Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeablness, empathy, and helping a person in situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social psychology , 93 , 583-599.
Hardtke, K., & Angus, L. (2004). The Narrative Assessment Interview: Assessing self-change in psychotherapy. In L. Angus & J. McLeod (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory and research (pp. 247-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hayner, P. B. (1996). Commissioning the truth: Further research questions. Third World Quarterly , 17 , 19-29.
Kaiser, C. R ., & Prat-Hyatt, J. S. (2009) . Distributing prejudice unequally: Do whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities?. Journal of personality and social psychology , 96 , 432-445.
Kohut, H. (1981). On empathy. In P. Ornstein (Ed.), The search for the self , Vol. 4 (pp. 525-535), New York, NY: International Universities Press.
Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., Pate-Carolan, L. M. & Gray Evans, L. (2008). Practicing counseling and psychotherapy: Insights from trainees, supervisors and clients . New York: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Laskov-Peled, R., & Wolf, Y. (2010). Children's willingness to help peers in need: Is development of sociability approach orchestrated dis-harmonically? International Journal of Arts and Sciences , 3 , 127-152.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies . Washington, D. C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Mollov, B., & Barhoum, M. (1998). Building Cultural/Religious Bridges Between Arab and Jewish University Students . Internet Sites: Ariga & Meria.
Pachankis, J., & Goldfried, M. R. (2007). An integrative principle-based approach to psychotherapy integration. In G. Hofman & J. Weinberger (Eds.) The art and science psychotherapy (pp. 49-68). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist , 5 , 209-220.
Rokeach, M. (Ed.). (1960). The open and closed mind . New York: Basic Books.
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The meaning and consequences of Perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12 pp. 167-169). Chicgester, United Kindom: Wiley.
Sellers, R. M., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. Journal of personality and social psychology , 84 ; 1079-1092.
Shimkin, T., Idisis, Y., & Wolf, Y. (In Press). Empathy in psychotherapy; it's expression in functional-cognitive schemes of patient's and therapist's .
Staats, A.W. (1999). Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda. Review of General Psychology , 3 , 3-13.
Van der Merwe, H. (1999). The Truth and Reconciliation Cmmission and Community Reconciliation: An Analysis of Competing Strategies and Conceptualizations . George Mason University.
Warner, M. S. (1997). Does empathy cure? A theoretical consideration of empathy, processing, and personal narrative. In A. C. Bohart & L. S.Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 125-140). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Winslade, J., & Monk, G. (2000). Narrative mediation: A new approach to conflict resolution . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wolf, Y. (2001). Modularity in everyday life judgments of aggression and violent behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal , 6 , 1-34.
Wolf, Y. (2002). Violations of out-group and in-group regulations in the eyes of ordinary and protected prisoners: An instance of judgmental modularity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 46 , 206-219.
Wolf, Y., & Laskov-Peled, R. (2010). Educational figures as model for empathetic communication at school: An exploratory examination of an integrative assessment model. Journal of US-China Public Administration, From Knoledge to Wisdom , 7 , 85-91.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.