Keywords
helping behavior
empathy
habits
rats
How to Cite
Abstract
In recent years, several authors have used rodent models to study empathy. In particular, it has been suggested that helping behavior in rats is motivated by empathic reasons. Although several authors support such perspective, some researchers have pointed out to inconsistent data. For example, if the mechanism underlying helping behavior is empathy, rats would perform that behavior only to end the distress in another rat. However, it has been observed that rats perform helping behavior even when that behavior does not work. One experiment with rats was conducted to explore whether the amount of training impairs the goal-direct component of the helping behavior. An experimental task that involved a free rat releasing a trapped rat in a restrainer was used. Group Short learned to open the restrainer for few sessions, whereas rats in Group Long opened the restrainer for an extensive period. Finally, both groups received a generalization test with an empty restrainer. Rats in Group Short did not open the restrainer during testing, while rats in Group Long did it. The role of habits in pro-social behaviors is discussed.
Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Sciene, 344, 1427-1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210789
Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Rodgers, D. A., Bernardez, Sarria, M. S., Decety, J. y Mason, P.(2014). Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife 3, http://dx.doi.org/01385. 10.7554/eLife.01385
Bernal-Gamboa, R. (2016). Conducta Pro-social en Ratas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, Aceptado.
Church, R. M. (1959). Emotional reactions of rats to the pain of others. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 132-134.
Cronin, K. A. (2012). Prosocial behavior in animals: the influence of social relationships, communication and rewards. Animal Behaviour, 84,1085-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.009
Decety, J. (2011). The neuroevolution of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1231, 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06027.x.
Decety, J., Norma, G. J., Bernston, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). A neurobehavioral evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms underlying empathy. Progress in Neurobiology, 98, 38-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.001
de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annual Reviews of Psychology 59, 279-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
de Waal, F. B. (2013). The bonobo and the atheist. In search of humanins among the primates. W. W. Norton & Company. New York.
Dickinson, A. (1985). Actions and habits: The development of behavioural autonomy. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 308, 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1985.0010
Dickinson, A. (2011). Goal-directed behavior and future planning in animals. En Menzel, R. & Fischer, J. (Eds). Animal Thinking: Contemporary issues in comparative cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 79-91.
Drayton, L. A., & Santos, L. R. (2014). Capuchins’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to others’ goal-directed actions in a helping context. Animal Cognition, 17, 589-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0700-5
Hall, G. (2002). Associative structures in Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. En C.R. Gallistel (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, third edition, (Vol. 3, pp. 1-45). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hernandez-Lallement, J., van Windergen, M., Marx, C., Srejic, M., & Kalenscher,T. (2015). Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00443
Langford, D. J., Bailey, A. L., Chanda, M. L., Clarke, S. E., Drummond, T. E., Echols, S., Glick, S., Ingrao, J., Klassen-Ross, T., LaCroix-Fralish, M. L., Matsumiya, L., Sorge, R. E., Sotocinal, S., Tabaka, J. M., Wong, D.,van den Maagdenberg, A. M. J. M., Ferrari, M. D., Craig, K. D., & Mogil, J. S. (2010). Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nature Methods, 7, 447-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1455
Langford, D. J., Crager, S. E., Shehzad, Z., Smith, S. B., Sotocinal, S. G., Levenstadt, J. S.,Chanda, M. L., Levitin, D. J., & Mogil, J. S. (2006). Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice. Science, 312, 1967-1970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1128322
Marshall-Pescini, S., Dale, R., Quervet-Chaumette, M., & Range, F. (2016). Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species. Animal Cognition, 19, 679-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0973-6
Márquez, C., Rennie, S. M., Costa, D. F., & Moita, M. A. (2015). Prosocial choice in rats depends on food-seeking behavior displayed by recipients. Current Biology, 25, 1736-1745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.018
Mason, P., (2014). With a little help from our friends: How the brain processes empathy, Cerebrum, 14, 1-6.
Meyza, K. Z., Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Monfils, M. H., Pankseep, J. B., & Knaspka, E. (2016). The roots of empathy: Through the lens of rodent models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, En prensa.
Mogil, J. S. (2012). The surprising empathic abilities of rodents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 143-144.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.012
Rice, G. R., & Gainer, P. (1962). “Altruism”in the albino rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychoology. 55, 123-125.
Sato, N., Tan, L., Tate, K., & Okada, M. (2015). Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific. Animal Cognition, 18, 1039-1047.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0872-2
Silberberg, A., Allouch, C., Sandfort, S., Kearns, D., Karpel, H., & Slotnik, B. (2014). Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain “rescue” behavior in rats. Animal Cognition, 17, 609-618.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0692-1
Vasconcelos, M., Hollis, K., Nowbahari, E., & Kacelnik, A. (2012). Pro-sociality without empathy. Biology Letters,8, 910-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0554
Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5, 1414-1420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311, 1301-1303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448
Yamamoto, S., Humle, T., & Tanaka, M. (2009). Chimpanzees help each other upon request. Plos One, 4, e7416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007416
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.