“If You are Moral and Competent, I Will Adopt Your Culture”: The Mediating Role of Positive Emotions in the Acculturation Process of Ecuadorian Immigrants in Spain
HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

stereotyped dimensions
positive emotions
acculturation preferences
Ecuadorian immigrants

How to Cite

“If You are Moral and Competent, I Will Adopt Your Culture”: The Mediating Role of Positive Emotions in the Acculturation Process of Ecuadorian Immigrants in Spain. (2018). Universitas Psychologica, 16(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-5.mcae
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The psychosocial processes involved in the acculturation preferences of immigrants are important to understand intercultural relationships in multicultural contexts. This work analyzes how three stereotype dimensions and positive emotions are related to the acculturation preferences of Ecuadorians living in Spain. A sample of 92 Ecuadorians (53.3% female; Mage = 31.58 years) answered to a questionnaire expressing how moral, sociable and competent they perceived Spanish people were, to what extent they felt positive emotions towards Spanish people, and their own acculturation preferences regarding maintenance of their original culture and adoption of the Spanish culture. Results show that the way Ecuadorians perceive Spanish people (especially regarding their morality and competence) predicts their preference for adopting Spanish customs through positive emotions.

HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Arenas, P., & Urzúa, A. (2016). Estrategias de aculturación e identidad étnica: un estudio en migrantes sur-sur en el norte de Chile. Universitas Psychologica, 15, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.eaie

Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999497378467

Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology, 38, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x

Bourhis, R. Y., Moïse, L. C., Perreault, S., & Senécal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075997400629

Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397-408. https://doi.org/101521soco2014324397

Brown, R., & Zagefka, H. (2011). The dynamics of acculturation: An intergroup perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 129-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00003-2

Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 32, 535-544. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61-149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., ….Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Toward universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935

Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination: Another look. En C. N. McCrae, C. Stangor & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). Nueva York: Guilford.

Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the Stereotype Content Model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021020920715

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Grigoryev, D., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). Acculturation profiles of Russian-speaking immigrants in Belgium and their socioeconomic adaptation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38, 797-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1268145

Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Nueva York: Guilford Press.

Landy, J. F., Piazza, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2016). When is bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1272-1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216655984

Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234

Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2015). Groups and morality. En M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio & J. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 2. Group processes (pp. 123-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Lee, T. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Not an out group, not yet an in group: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005

López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Aplicación extendida del Modelo del Contenido de los Estereotipos (MCE) hacia tres grupos de inmigrantes en España. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375

López-Rodríguez, L., & Zagefka, H. (2015). The effects of stereotype content on acculturation preferences and prosocial tendencies: The prominent role of morality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.006

López-Rodríguez, L., Zagefka, H., Navas, M., & Cuadrado, I. (2014). Explaining majority members’ acculturation preferences for minority members: A mediation model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.07.001

Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616. https://doi.org/10.10371/0022-3514.79.4.602

Mackie, D. M., Smith, E. R., & Ray, D. G. (2008). Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 2, 1866-1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x

Maisonneuve, Ch., & Testé, B. (2007). Acculturation preferences of a host community: The effects of immigrant acculturation strategies on evaluations and impression formation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 669-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.06.001

Martín, R. (2017). Estudios de aculturación en España en la última década. Papeles del Psicólogo, 38, 125-134. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2017.2826

Matera, C., Stefanile, C., & Brown, R. (2012). Host culture adoption or intercultural contact? Comparing different acculturation conceptualizations and their effects on host members’ attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.00

Migration Policy Institute. (2014). Ecuador: From mass emigration to return migration? Recuperado de http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/ecuador-mass-emigration-return-migration

Navas, M., López-Rodríguez, L., & Cuadrado, I. (2013). Mantenimiento y adaptación cultural de diferentes grupos inmigrantes: variables predictoras. Anales de Psicología, 29, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.1.135491

Navas, M. S., & Rojas, A. J. (Coords.). (2010). Aplicación del Modelo Ampliado de Aculturación Relativa (MAAR) a nuevos colectivos de inmigrantes en Andalucía: rumanos y ecuatorianos. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.

Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., & Obdrzálck, P. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00020-6

Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330

Roblain, A., Azzi, A., & Licata, L. (2016). Why do majority members prefer immigrants who adopt the host culture? The role of perceived identification with the host nation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.08.001

Rojas, A., Navas, M., Sayans-Jiménez, P., & Cuadrado, I. (2014). Acculturation preference profiles of Spaniards and Romanian immigrants: The role of prejudice and public and private acculturation areas. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.903223

Rudmin, F. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology, 7, 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.3

Stangor, C., Sullivan, L. A., & Ford, T. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.4.359

Talaska, C. A., Fiske, S. T., & Chaiken, S. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of the racial attitude-behavior literature shows that emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination. Social Justice Research: Social Power in Action, 21, 263-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0071-2

Van Acker, K., & Vanbeselaere, N. (2011). Bringing together acculturation theory and intergroup contact theory: Predictors of Flemings’ expectations of Turks’ acculturation behavior. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.004

Yzerbyt, V. (2016). Intergroup stereotyping. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.009

Zagefka, H., Binder, J., Brown, R., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Funke F., …Maquil, A. (2014). The relationship between acculturation preferences and prejudice: Longitudinal evidence from majority and minority groups in three European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 578-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2044

Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.73

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.