Friends with Benefits vs. Casual Sex: Defining their Sexual Behaviors, Love, Jealousy and Romantic Beliefs
HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

friends with benefits
casual sex
sexual behaviors
love
romantic beliefs

How to Cite

Friends with Benefits vs. Casual Sex: Defining their Sexual Behaviors, Love, Jealousy and Romantic Beliefs. (2019). Universitas Psychologica, 18(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-2.absc
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

This research reveals the aspects and characteristics of the relationships of friends with benefits, comparing it with the practice of sex with unknown people. A total of 172 people completed an online questionnaire asking for information about their sexual behaviors, their love styles, and their beliefs about romantic love. The findings reveal that sexual and emotional practices are more prevalent in the relationship of friends with benefits than in one-night sex. Likewise, these subjects manifest a style of love based on passion and intimacy, but lacking commitment. Nevertheless, they keep romantic love beliefs. These results reinforce the hybrid character of friends with benefits, halfway between the purely sexual bond and the romantic relationship.

HTML Full Text (Spanish)
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Autor (2016). “Amigos con beneficios”: salud sexual y estilos de apego de hombres y mujeres. Saúde e Sociedade, 25(4), 1136-1147.

Bauman, Z. (2001). La sociedad individualizada. Madrid: Cátedra.

Bauman, Z. (2005). Amor líquido. Acerca de la fragilidad de los vínculos humanos. México DF: FCE.

Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 66-73.

Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. (2013).Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138-150.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hilsdale. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

de Olalla, P. G. (2007). Comentario. «Amigos con derecho a roce». Gaceta Sanitaria, 21(6), 479.

Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & NeumarkSztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(4), 231-237.

Fernández-Dávila, P. (2007). «Amigos con derecho a roce»: Una oportunidad para contraer la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en hombres homo/bixesuales con prácticas sexuales de alto riesgo. Gaceta Sanitaria, 21(6), 471-478.

Ferrer Pérez, V., & Bosch Fiol, E. (2013). Del amor romántico a la violencia de género. para una coeducación emocional en la agenda educativa. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado,17 (1), 105-122

Fuente, M. (2010). El resurgir de la sífilis. Actas Dermosifiliograficas, 101(10), 817-819.

Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2011).Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 554-564.

Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 192-208.

Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.

Gusarova, I., Fraser, V., & Alderson, K. G. (2012). A quantitative study of ‘friends with benefits’ relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,21(1), 41-59.

Hatfield, E., Hutchison, E.S.S, Bensman, L., Young, D. & Rapson, R. L.(2012). Cultural, social, and gender influences on casual sex: New developments. in J.M. Turner & A.D. Mitchell (eds.), Social psychology: New developments (pp. 1-37). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

Hernández González, J., & Weiss, E. (2012). Amor y sexualidad entre jóvenes de la educación media en México. Ponencia VI Jornadas de Investigación en Educación. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

Illouz, E. (2009). El consumo de la utopía romántica. Madrid-Buenos Aires: Katz Editores

Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 46(5), 460-470.

Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 486-495.

Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2014). Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners. Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 74-85.

Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2-3), 275-284.

Luiz de Andrade, A., & Wachelke, J. (2011). La asociación de configuraciones estructurales de las relaciones románticas con las creencias sobre las relaciones de pareja: Un estudio de las representaciones sociales. Anales De Psicología, 27(3), 834-842.

Lyons, H., Manning, W., Giordano, P., & Longmore, M. (2010). Casual sex among young adults: Education differentials. Working Paper Center for Family and Demographic Research 2010-07.

Macchi, M., Benítez Leite, S., Núñez C., & Ortigoza, D. (2008). Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas acerca del VIH/SIDA en jóvenes de nivel medio de educación, del área metropolitana, paraguay. Revista Chilena De Pediatría, 79(2), 206-217.

Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking Up The Relationship Contexts of “Nonrelationship” Sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(5), 459-483.

Marganski, A., & Fauth, K. (2013). Hooking up in the Twenty-First Century. Social Crimonol 1 (1), 2-7.

Marquard, O. (2001). Filosofía de la compensación. Barcelona: Paidós.

McGinty, K., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (2007). Friends with benefits: Women want "friends," men want "benefits". College Student Journal, 41, 1128-1131.

Mongeau, P. A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 37-47.

Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Hooking up and penetrative hookups: Correlates that differentiate college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 573-583.

Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011a). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on “friends with benefits” relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 311-320.

Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011b). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 321-330.

Puentes, J., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (2008). Participants in ‘‘friends with benefits’’ relationships. College Student Journal, 42, 176–180.

Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender y Society, 25(5), 545-568.

Rodríguez García de Cortázar, Ainhoa, Hernán, M., Cabrera León, A., García Calleja, J. M., & Romo Avilés, N. (2007). ¿Qué opinan adolescentes y jóvenes sobre el consumo de drogas recreativas y las conductas sexuales de riesgo? Adicciones, 19, 153-167.

Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ryall, R. (2012). Sexual practices and the duration of last heterosexual encounter: Findings from the australian longitudinal study of health and relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(5), 487-494.

Scott, C. L., Hash, J. M., Stevens, P., & Tejada, T. (2016). Divorcing Commitment: Examining the Role of Parental Divorce in Undergraduates’ Friends with Benefits Relationships. In G. Gianesini & S. Lee Blair, Divorce, Separation, and Remarriage: The Transformation of Family (pp. 229-250). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Smith, A. M. A., Patrick, K., Heywood, W., Pitts, M. K., Richters, J., Shelley, J. M., Simpson & Ryall, R. (2012). Body mass index, sexual difficulties and sexual satisfaction among people in regular heterosexual relationships: a population‐based study. Internal medicine journal, 42(6), 641-651.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love.Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 313-335.

Uribe, J. I., Amador, G., Zacarías, X., & Villarreal, L. (2012). Percepciones sobre el uso del condón y la sexualidad entre jóvenes. Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 10(1).

Vega, J. D. S. (2009). "Debarías buscar un follamigo": a propósito de la flexibilidad en las relaciones personales. Témpora: Revista de historia y sociología de la educación, (12), 37-64.

Vizzuetth, A., García, M., & Guzmán, R. (2010). Expectativas sobre la relación de amigovios, freefly novios en jóvenes adultos. En A.S. Rivera, R. Diaz-Loving, A.R. Sánchez, I Reyes-Lagunes & L. Cruz Martinez, La Psicología Social En México, 13, (pp. 223-230). Mexico: AMEPSO.

Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(3), 75-91

Yela, C. (2003). La otra cara del amor: Mitos, paradojas y problemas. Encuentros En Psicología Social, 1(2), 263-267.

Yela, C. (2000). El amor desde la psicología social: ni tan libres, ni tan racionales. Madrid: Pirámide.

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.