Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory for the Chilean population: An international comparison
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
HTML Full Text (Spanish)

Keywords

time perspective
ZTPI
short version
international comparison
cross-cultural differences

How to Cite

Jofré, I., Oyanadel, C., & Peñate-Castro, W. (2022). Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory for the Chilean population: An international comparison. Universitas Psychologica, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy20.vbip
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Time perspective has been a topic of growing interest in the academic world, due to the relationship that has been established between this variable and elements such as subjective well-being, self-esteem, anxiety, stress, among others. The most widely used instrument for its measurement, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI), has been translated and adapted for use in various countries, including the construction of short versions. The present study proposes a brief version for the Chilean population with a sample of 829 people (46.6 % men, mean age = 29.33, SD = 13.48). Making a comparison with 6 other foreign short versions available. The proposed version has 15 items, 3 for each of the 5 factors of the original version. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to check the adequacy of the model, obtaining a good fit, similar to that found by other studies. It is proposed to continue studying and improving the psychometric properties of this version, highlighting the importance of taking into account differences due to cultural factors.

PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
HTML Full Text (Spanish)

Arbuckle, J. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos 24 User’s Guide. ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/24.0/en/amos/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Amos_User_Guide.pdf

Blanco, A., de la Corte, L., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2018). Para una psicología social crítica no construccionista: reflexiones a partir del realismo crítico de Ignacio Martín-Baró. Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-1.pscc

Boniwell, I. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one´s time in pursuit of optimal functioning. En: P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (eds.), Positive psychology in practice, pp. 165-178. Wiley.

Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the swedish zimbardo time perspective inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000076

Danner, D., Treiber, L., & Bosnjak, M. (2016). Development and psychometric evaluation of a short version of the Time Perspective Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000382

Garzón-Umerenkova, A., & Gil-Flores, J. (2017). Gestión del tiempo y procrastinación en la educación superior. Universitas Psychologica, 16(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-3.gtpe

Gilbert, S. P., & Sifers, S. K. (2011). Bouncing back from a breakup: Attachment, time perspective, mental health, and romantic loss. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25(4), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2011.605693

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58

Jesus, P. (2013). Self as future: Vocational life-narratives and identity exploration in adolescence. En P. Paixão, J. Da Silva, V. Ortuño, & P. Cordeiro (eds.), International Studies in Time Perspective, pp. 25-32. Coimbra University Press.

Kemper, C., Trapp, S., Kathmann, N., Samuel, D., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Short versus long scales in clinical assessment: Exploring the trade-off between resources saved and psychometric quality lost using two measures of obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Assessment, 26(5), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118810057

Košťál, J., Klicperová-Baker, M., Lukavská, K., & Lukavský, J. (2016). Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI–short) with and without the Future-Negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples. Time & Society, 25(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577254

Levine, R. (2006). Una geografía del tiempo. Siglo XXI.

McKay, M. T. & Cole, J. C. (2020). The relationship between balanced and negative time perspectives, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113383

Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. McGraw-Hill.

Orkibi, H. (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Short Version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 38(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278714531601

Orosz, G., Dombi, E., Tóth-Király, I., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2017). The Less is More: The 17-Item Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Current Psychology, 36(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9382-2

Oyanadel, C., & Buela-Casal, G. (2011). La percepción del tiempo: influencias en la salud física y mental. Universitas Psychologica, 10(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy10-1.ptis

Oyanadel, C. & Buela-Casal, G. (2014). Time perception and psychopathology: Influence of time perspective on quality of life on severe mental illness. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 42, 99-107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24844809/

Oyanadel, C., & Buela-Casal, G. (2017). Percepción del tiempo y salud: la influencia del perfil temporal equilibrado (BTP) y el perfil temporal negativo (NTP) en la salud física y mental. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2017.1034

Oyanadel, C., Buela-Casal, G., & Pérez-Fortis, A. (2014a). Propiedades psicométricas del inventario de orientación temporal de Zimbardo en una muestra Chilena. Terapia Psicologica, 32(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082014000100005

Oyanadel, C., Buela-Casal, G., Araya, T., Olivares, C., & Vega, H. (2014b). Percepción del tiempo: resultados de una intervención grupal breve para el cambio del perfil temporal. Suma Psicológica, 21(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0121-4381(14)70001-3

Papastamatelou, J., Unger, A., Giotakos, O., & Athanasiadou, F. (2015). Is Time Perspective a Predictor of Anxiety and Perceived Stress? Some Preliminary Results from Greece. Psychological Studies, 60(4), 468-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0342-6

Przepiorka, A., & Blachnio, A. (2016). Time perspective in Internet and Facebook addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.045

Przepiorka, A., Sobol-Kwapinska, M., & Jankowski, T. (2016). A polish short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.047

Santamaría, A., Cubero, M., & de la Mata, M. (2019). Towards a cultural psychology: Meaning and social practice as key elements. Universitas Psychologica, 18, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-1.tcpm

Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2018). Putting time in a wider perspective: The past, the present, and the future of time perspective theory. En V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences, pp. 592-628. SAGE.

Stolarski, M., Vowinckel, J., Jankowski, K. S., & Zajenkowski, M. (2016). Mind the balance, be contented: Balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.039

Taber, B. J., & Blankemeyer, M. S. (2015). Time perspective and vocational identity statuses of emerging adults. Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12008

Temple, E., Perry, J. L., Worrell, F. C., Zivkovic, U., Mello, Z. R., Musil, B., Cole, J. C., & McKay, M. T. (2017). The Zimbardo time perspective inventory: Time for a new strategy, not more new shortened versions. Time & Society, 25, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X17718102

Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Bowerman, T. (2013a). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time & Society, 22(3), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X12441174

Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013b). Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x

Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148

Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Zimbardo, P. & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York, NY, US: Free Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Ignacio Jofré, Cristián Oyanadel, Wenceslao Peñate-Castro