Construction of quality culture in a public hospital from a human management perspective: tensions and paradoxes
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

health quality
quality management
human resource management
organizational culture

How to Cite

Construction of quality culture in a public hospital from a human management perspective: tensions and paradoxes. (2010). Universitas Psychologica, 10(3), 841-853. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy10-3.ccch
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore about the meaning of quality discourse in a public hospital in Bogota, and particularly the role that human management plays in the construction of a quality culture, in order to glimpse the interests to which this discourse responds, and the tensions aroused. In the process of quality culture construction, it is observed an ambiguous conception of worker: as a fundamental element in the construction of quality system and as a cost to be minimized. It is concluded that the quality discourse responds to an economic-administrative logic which measurements and categories legitimates a health model based on the market and besides it is exposed the role of Human Resource Management –through the use of psychological techniques– in the reproduction of this model.

PDF (Spanish)

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.