Abstract
The dilemma about sexuality and gender regulation has been constituted as a debate of continuous conversation and re-meaning from the academy. The transdisciplinarity which characterizes the approaches, allowed the repercussion in diverse fields as well as the intervention, frequently effective, in the daily social and legal arena. Unfortunately, the effort still isn´t enough in order to challenge certain culture implicit everyday rules. This ontology’s about sexuality and gender make possible some identity narrations and prevent others, often reproducing phobias that are founded from the heterosexual dominant logic. This research arises as an opportunity to comprehend the theories that nourish the social imaginaries of some of the persons who have non-hegemonic erotic preferences, from the narratives of the real experts. For the analysis of the discourse, has been done a qualitative study of eclectic nature (Whetherell, 1998). The argumentative resources that have been rhetorically analyzed are those that allowed participants to articulate the different dominant speeches about sexuality and roles of gender. We also tried to recognize those places where the possibilities of construction of satisfactory and non-conformist narratives are, where the different voices which configure the identity achieve to talkThis journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.