Keywords
habitat preference
camera traps
neotropical mammals
Orinoco basin
How to Cite
Abstract
Habitat conditions are fundamental to provide essential requirements for mammal species to ensure their viability in natural communities. The Colombian Llanos are home to a high mammal biodiversity, but few studies in this region have addressed key aspects of their natural history, such as habitat use and preference. In this study, we evaluated medium and large-size mammal use of gallery forests and open savannas in two locations within the Colombian Llanos, analyzing species’ habitat preferences with the hypothesis that mammal species would use and prefer gallery forests over open savannas. We installed 60 camera traps in two sites for 35 days (2100 camera traps / days), covering habitats of both gallery forests and open savannas. Detected species’ relative abundances were subjected to Chi-square analysis and Bonferroni 95 % confidence intervals to assess their habitat use and preferences. All recorded mammal species used the gallery forest and ≈ 50 % of these species exclusively used it. Forest preference was high among mammals, but some species found complementary resources in open savannas. Only capybaras revealed a significant preference for the open savanna. We highlight the importance of conserving gallery forests and open savannas in the Colombian Llanos to improve habitat conditions that guarantee mammal survival. Landowners should be encouraged to deploy conservation initiatives to ensure the long-term protection of natural areas required by mammal species.
[1] Mora-Fernandez C, Peñuela-Recio L, Castro-Lima F. Estado del conocimiento de los
ecosistemas de las sabanas inundables en la Orinoquia Colombiana. Orinoquia, 19(2):
253–271, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.339
[2] Sarmiento G. The savannas of tropical America. In Bourliere F. (ed.). Ecosystems of the
World XIII Tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holanda, 1983.
[3] Sarmiento G. Ecology of Neotropical Savannas. Harvard University Press, Boston, US,
1984.
[4] Rippstein G, Amesquita E, Escobar G, Grollier C. Condiciones naturales de las sabanas. In:
Rippstein G., Escobar G., Motta F (Eds.) Agroecología y Biodiversidad de las Sabanas de
los Llanos Orientales. CIAT. Cali, Colombia. 1-21, 2001.
[5] Romero M, Galindo G, Otero J, Armenteras D. Ecosistemas de la cuenca del Orinoco
colombiano. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
Bogotá, Colombia, 2004.
[6] Romero-Ruiz MH, Flantua SGA, Tansey K, Berrio JC. Landscape transformations in
savannas of northern South America: Land use/cover Changes since 1987 in the Llanos
Orientales of Colombia. Applied Geography, 32: 766–776, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.010
[7] IGAC. 1993. Suelos departamento de Casanare. Bogotá, D. C.: Instituto Geográfico Agustín
Codazzi.
[8] Lasso C, Rial A, Matallana C, Ramírez W, Selñaris J, Díaz-pulido A, Corzo G,
Machado-Allison A. (Eds). Biodiversidad de la cuenca del Orinoco. II Áreas prioritarias
para la conservación y uso sostenible. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos
Alexander von Humboldt, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, WWF
Colombia, Fundación Omacha, Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto de
Estudios de la Orinoquia (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Bogotá, D.C., Colombia,
2011.
[9] Van der Hoek Y, Álvarez Solas S, Peñuela MC. The palm Mauritia flexuosa, a keystone
plant resource on multiple fronts. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28: 539–551, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-01686-4
[10] Pineda-Guerrero A, González-Maya JF, Pérez-Torres J. Conservation value of forest
fragments for medium-sized carnivores in a silvopastoral system in Colombia. Mammalia,
79(1): 115–119, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0050
[11] Rodrigues TF, Chiarello AG. Native forests within and outside protected areas are key
for nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) occupancy in agricultural landscapes.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 266: 133–141, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.08.001
[12] Azevedo FC, Lemos FG, Freitas-Junior MC, Arrais RC, Morato RG, Azevedo FCC. The
importance of forests for an apex predator: spatial ecology and habitat selection by pumas
in an agroecosystem. Animal Conservation, 24(3): 499–509, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12659
[13] Mourão G, Medri ÍM. Activity of a specialized insectivorous mammal (Myrmecophaga
tridactyla) in the Pantanal of Brazil. Journal of Zoology, 271: 187-192, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00198.x
[14] Bello C, Galetti M, Pizo MA, Magnago LFS, Rocha MF, Lima RAF, Peres CA, Ovaskainen
O, Jordano P. Defaunation affects carbon storage in tropical forests. Science Advances, 1:
e1501105, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501105
[15] Sobral M, Silvius KM, Overman H, Oliveira LFB, Rabb TK. Mammal diversity influences
the carbon cycle through trophic interactions in the Amazon. Nature Ecology & Evolution,
1: 1670–1676, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0334-0
[16] Lacher TE, Davidson AD, Fleming TH, Gómez-Ruiz EP, McCracken GF, Owen-Smith N,
Peres CA, Vander Wall SB. The functional roles of mammals in ecosystems. Journal of
Mammalogy, 100(3): 942–964, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy183
[17] Andreazzi CS, Pires AS, Fernandez FA. Mamíferos e palmeiras neotropicais: interações em
paisagens fragmentadas. Oecologia Brasiliensis, 13(4): 554–574, 2009.
et al. 2025 75
[18] Mosquera-Guerra F, Trujillo F, Díaz-Pulido A, Mantilla-Meluk H. Diversidad, abundancia
relativa y patrones de actividad de los mamíferos medianos y grandes, asociados a los
bosques riparios del río Bita, Vichada, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 19: 202–218, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.21068/c2018.v19n01a13
[19] Castillo-Figueroa D, Martínez-Medina D, Rodríguez-Posada M, Bernal-Vergara S. Structural
differences in mammal assemblages between savanna ecosystems of the Colombian Llanos.
Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 59: e20195914, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.14
[20] Castillo-Figueroa D, Martínez-Medina D, Rodríguez-Posada ME. Activity patterns of
medium and large mammals in two savanna ecosystems in the Colombian Llanos. Revista
de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 45(177): 1071–1083,
2021.
https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1461
[21] Sánchez-Lalinde C, Pérez-Torres J. Uso de habitat de carnívoros simpátricos en una zona de
bosque seco tropical de Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical, 15(1): 167–174, 2008.
[22] Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social – CONPES. Compes 3797. Política para
el desarrollo integral de la Orinoquía: Altillanura- Fase I, 2014.
https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3797.pdf
[23] López-Ricaurte L, Edwards DP, Romero-Rodríguez N, Gilroy J. Impacts of oil palm
expansion on avian biodiversity in a Neotropical natural savanna. Biological Conservation,
213: 225–233, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.009
[24] August PV. The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical
communities. Ecology, 64: 1495-1507, 1983.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1937504
[25] Baptiste I, Ariza A. Ecología de las Sabanas inundables de Casanare. In: Baleta A, Benítez
J. (Eds.). Congreso Internacional de Producción y Desarrollo Sostenible, Versión Sabanas
inundables, 1º. Memorias. Arauca, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. 120–140, 2008.
[26] Etter A. Mapa general de ecosistemas de Colombia. In: Chaves, ME, Arango N (Eds.).
Informe Nacional sobre el estado de la biodiversidad en Colombia – 1997. Bogotá, Instituto
Alexander Von Humboldt, 1998.
[27] O’Brien T, Kinnaird M, Wibisono, H. Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and
prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation, 6(2): 131–139, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943003003172
[28] Cruz P, Paviolo A, Bó RF, Thompson JJ, Di Bitetti MS. Daily activity patterns and habitat
use of the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) in the Atlantic Forest. Mammalian Biology,
79(6): 376–383, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.06.003
[29] Krausman PR. Some Basic Principles of Habitat Use. In: Launchbaugh, K.L., Sanders, K.D.
and Mosley, J.L., (Eds.). Grazing Behaviour of Livestock and Wildlife. Idaho Forest,Wildlife
and Range Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 70, University of Idaho, Moscow, 85–90, 1999.
[30] Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML. The habitat concept and a plea for standard. Wildlife
Society Bulletin, 25(1): 173–182, 1997.
[31] Lovallo MJ, Anderson EM. Bobcat (Lynx rufus) home range size and habitat use in Northwest
Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist, 135: 241–252, 1996.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2426706
[32] Byers CR, Steinhorst RK, Krausman PR. Clarification of a technique for analysis of
utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 48(3): 1050–1053, 1984.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3801467
[33] Cherry S. A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies.
Journal of Wildlife Management, 60(3): 653–658, 1996.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3802084
[34] Montenegro JA, Acosta A, Reimer JD. HaviStat© v2.2: Application to estimate preference
for habitat and resources. Universitas Scientiarum, 19(3): 333–337, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.haea
[35] Emmons LH. Neotropical rainforest mammals. A field guide. The University of Chicago
Press, Chicago, USA, 1990.
[36] Reid FA. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Oxford
University Press, New York, USA, 1997.
[37] Ávila-Nájera DM, Chávez C, Pérez-Elizalde S, Guzmán-Plazola RA, Mendoza GD,
Lazcano-Barrero MA. Ecology of Puma concolor (Carnivora: Felidae) in a Mexican tropical
forest: adaptation to environmental disturbances. Revista de Biología Tropical, 66(1): 78–90,
2018.
https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v66i1.27862
[38] Holmes BR, Laundré JW. Use of open, edge and forest areas by pumas Puma concolor in
winter: Are pumas foraging optimally? Wildlife Biology, 12: 201–209, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[201:UOOEAF]2.0.CO;2
[39] McNab BK. Energetics and the limits to a temperate distribution in Armadillos. Journal of
Mammalogy, 61: 606–627, 1980.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1380307
[40] Eisenberg JF, Redford KH. Mammals of the Neotropics: The Central Neotropics. The
University of Chicago Press, Illinois, USA, 1999.
[41] Aya-Cuero CA, Mosquera-Guerra F, Esquivel DA, Trujillo F, Brooks D. Medium and large
mammals of the mid Planas River basin, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 20(2): 76–92, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.21068/c2019.v20n02a06
[42] Sandoval-Gómez VE, Ramírez-Cháves HE, Marín D. Registros de hormigas y termitas
presentes en la dieta de osos hormigueros (Mammalia: Myrmecophagidae) en tres
localidades de Colombia. Edentata, 13: 1–9, 2012.
[43] Gallo JA, Abba AM, Elizalde L, Di Nucci D, Ríos TA, Ezquiaga MC. First study on food
habits of anteaters, Myrmecophaga tridactyla and Tamandua tetradactyla, in the southern
limit of their distribution. Mammalia, 81: 601–604, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0117
[44] Desbiez ALJ, Santos SA, Keuroghlian A, Bodmer RE. Niche partitioning among
white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari), collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu), and feral pigs
(Sus scrofa). Journal of Mammalogy, 90: 119–128, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1644/08-MAMM-A-038.1
[45] Kiltie R. Stomach contents of rain forest peccaries (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari). Biotropica,
13(3): 234–236, 1981.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2388133
[46] Olmos F. Diet of sympatric Brazilian caatinga peccaries (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari).
Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9(2): 255–258, 1993.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400007276
[47] Zaldivar B, Chavez K, Valiente E, Ramos Y, Salinas P, Weiler A. Uso de hábitat y patrones
de actividad de los pecaríes labiado (Tayassu pecari) y de collar (Pecari tajacu) en paisajes
ganaderos del Chaco Seco, Paraguay. Reportes científicos de la FACEN, 13(1): 20–27, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.18004/rcfacen.2022.13.1.20
[48] Ojasti J. Estudio biológico del chigüiro o capibara. Fondo Nacional de Investigaciones
Agropecuaria. Editorial Sucre, Caracas, Venezuela, 1973.
[49] Guzmán-Lenis AR, Maldonado Chaparro AA, López-Arévalo HF, Sánchez-Palomino P,
Montenegro OL, Torres MA. Evaluación de la calidad de hábitat disponible para el chigüiro
en el municipio de Paz de Ariporo, Casanare. En: López-Arévalo HFP, Sánchez-Palomino
P, Montenegro OL, editores. El Chigüiro Hidrochoerus hydrochaeris en la Orinoquía
colombiana: Ecología, manejo sostenible y conservación. Biblioteca José Jerónimo Triana
No. 25. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá,
Colombia, 2014.
[50] Pardo-Vargas L, Payán-Garrido E. Mamíferos de un agropaisaje de palma de aceite en las
sabanas inundables de Orocué, Casanare, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 16(1): 54–66, 2015.
[51] Pardo L, Campbell MJ, Edwards W, Clements GR, Laurance WF. Terrestrial mammal
responses to oil palm dominated landscapes in Colombia. PLoS ONE, 13: e0197539, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197539
[52] Rojano C, Padilla H, Giraldo A, Álvarez G, Ramos E. Registro de presencia del oso palmero
(Myrmecophaga tridactyla) en plantaciones forestales comerciales en Colombia. Edentata,
16: 1–6, 2015
[53] de Sampaio e Paiva Camilo-Alves C, de Miranda Mourão G. Responses of a specialized
insectivorous mammal (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) to variation in ambient temperature.
Biotropica, 38: 52–56, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00106.x
[54] Galindo-Leal C, Weber M. El Venado de la Sierra Madre Occidental. Ecología, Manejo y
Conservación. EDICUSA-CONABIO, Ciudad de México, México, 1998.
[55] Álvarez-Cárdenas S, Gallina S, Gallina-Tessaro P, Domínguez-Cadena R. Habitat availability
for the mule deer (Cervidae) population in a relictual oak-pine forest in Baja California Sur,
México. Tropical Zoology, 12: 67–78, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.1999.10539378
[56] Boyce M, Mao J, Merril E, Fortin D, Turner M, Fryxell J, Turchin P. Scale and heterogeneity
in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Ecoscience, 10: 421–431, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2003.11682790
[57] Hanley T. A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection
by deer (Cervidae). Oikos, 79: 209–218, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3546006
[58] Mandujano S, Gallina S, Arceo G, Pérez-Jiménez L. Variación del uso y preferencia de
los tipos vegetacionales por el venado cola blanca en un bosque tropical de Jalisco. Acta
Zoológica Mexicana, 20: 45–67, 2004.
[59] Flores-Armillas VH, Botello F, Sánchez-Cordero V, García-Barrios R, Jaramillo F,
Gallina-Tessaro S. Caracterización del hábitat del venado cola blanca (Odocoileus
virginianus mexicanus) en los bosques templados del Corredor Biológico Chichinautzin y
modelación de su hábitat potencial en Eje Transvolcánico Mexicano. Therya, 4(2): 377–393,
2013.
https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-13-118
[60] Contreras F, Zuñiga S, Bello J. Preferencia de hábitat de Odocoileus virginianus thomasi
Merriam en dos ejidos ganaderos del sureste de México. Revista Agroproductividad, 8(5),
2015.
[61] Medina-Torres SM, García-Moya E, Márquez-Olivas M, Romero-Manzanares A,
Vaquera-Huerta H, Martínez-Menes M. Relación hábitat-densidad de Odocoileus virginianus
couesi (Coues & Yarrow, 1875) en la Sierra del Laurel, Aguascalientes. Revista Mexicana
de Ciencias Forestales, 6(32): 17–36, 2015.
[62] Andrade GI, Corzo G. ¿Qué y dónde conservar? Mesa Nacional de Prioridades de
Conservación. Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales
(UAESPNN). Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, Bogotá, 2011.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dennis Castillo-Figueroa, Daniela Martínez-Medina, Miguel Rodríguez-Posada