La tecnoética de la información y la comunicación
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Resumen
La tecnoética (TE) es un campo de investigación interdisciplinar en el que se estudian los aspectos éitcos y morales de la tecnología en la sociead (Mitcham, 2005; Luppicini, 2008). El propósito de este artículo es promover una reflexión alrededor de los siguientes interrogantes: ¿Qué lugar ocupa la tecnoética en las sociedades de la información y la comunicación? ¿Cuáles son los desafíos de la comunicación en cuanto a ética y responsabilidad social? El artículo aporta una reflexión teórica sobre el papel que desempeña la tecnoética en las sociedades de la información y la comunicación. Para ello, analiza la relación que existe entre técnica y ética con el propósito de comprender mejor los problemas y las posiblidades de las organizaciones y la sociedad en cuanto a ética y responsabilidad social.
Keywords
Techno-Ethics, Information, Communication, Technology, Social responsibilityTechno-éthique, Information, Communication, Technologie, Responsabilité socialeTecnoética, Informação, Comunicação, Tecnologia, Responsabilidade socialTecnoética, Información, Comunicación, Tecnología, Responsabilidad social
References
Adam, A. (2002) Cyberstalking and Internet pornography: Gender and the gaze. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 133-142.
Boczkowski, P. (1999). Mutual shaping of users and technologies in a national virtual campus. Journal of Communication, 49, 86-106.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1989). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification.
Hakken, D. (2003). The knowledge landscapes of cyberspace. ny: Routledge.
Internet Architecture Board. (1989). Retrieved June 4, 2007, from http://tools.ietf.org/html/ rfc1087University of Chicago Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media converge. ny: nyu Press.
Jenkins, P. (2001) Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York University Press: New York.
Johannesen, R. (2008). Ethics in human communication (6th edition. ny: Waveland Press. Retreived February 1, 2009 from http://www. newsweek.com/id/45548/
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Luppicini, R. (2008). The emerging field of technoethics. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 1-19). Hershey, pa: Information Science Reference.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The Extensions of Man. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
Merz, M. (2006). Embedding digital infrastructures in epistemic cultures. In C. Hines (ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: understanding e-science (pp. 100-115). Hershey, Idea Group.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985) . No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1994). Medium theory. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 50-77). Stanford: Stanford University.
Mitcham, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (Ed.) Detroit: Macmillan Reference usa.
Mitchell, R., & Thurtle, P. (2004). Data made flesh: Embodying information. ny: Routledge.
Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science Press.
Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 543-558.
Patterson, P., & Wilkins, L. (2004). Media ethics: Issues and cases (5th edition). ny: McGrawHill.
Phillips, R., & Freeman, E. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berlin: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Postman, Neil. (1992) Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Real, M. (1975). Cultural studies and mediated reality. Journal of Popular Culture 9 (2), 81-5.
Redding, W. C. (1996). Ethics and the study of organizational communication: When will we wake up? In J.A.J.M.S. Pritchard (Ed.), Responsible communication: Ethical issues in business, industry, and the professions (pp. 17-40). Cresskill, nk: Hampton Press.
Regan S. (1996). Is there free speech on the Internet? Censorship in the global Information infrastructure. In R. Shields (ed.) Cultures of Internet virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2004). Digital citizenship: Focus questions for implementation. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(2), 12-15.
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2007). Organization Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Roberts, L. D. (2008). Cyber identity theft. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 542-557). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the internet. Information, Communication & Society, 2, 521-540.
Sanders, K. (2003). Ethics and journalism. London: Sage Publications.
Schilling, G. (2000). The virtual observatory moves closer to reality. Science, 289, 238-239.
Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Duham: Duke University Press.
Sutherland, N., Isaacs, P., Graham, P., & McKenna, B. (eds.) (2008). Towards humane technologies: biotechnology, new media, and ethics. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Turtle, P. & Howard, P. (eds). (2002). Semiotic Flesh: information and the human body. Seatle: University of Washington Press.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2005). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Visala, S. (2008). Planning, interests, and argumentation. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (eds.) (2008). Handbook of research on technoethics (pp 103-110). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., &. Tolhurst, N. (eds.). (2008). The a to z of corporate social responsibility. New York: Wiley.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. (1975). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Schocken.
Wilson, C. (2005). Computer attack and cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and policy issues for Congress.
Boczkowski, P. (1999). Mutual shaping of users and technologies in a national virtual campus. Journal of Communication, 49, 86-106.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1989). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification.
Hakken, D. (2003). The knowledge landscapes of cyberspace. ny: Routledge.
Internet Architecture Board. (1989). Retrieved June 4, 2007, from http://tools.ietf.org/html/ rfc1087University of Chicago Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media converge. ny: nyu Press.
Jenkins, P. (2001) Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York University Press: New York.
Johannesen, R. (2008). Ethics in human communication (6th edition. ny: Waveland Press. Retreived February 1, 2009 from http://www. newsweek.com/id/45548/
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Luppicini, R. (2008). The emerging field of technoethics. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 1-19). Hershey, pa: Information Science Reference.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The Extensions of Man. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
Merz, M. (2006). Embedding digital infrastructures in epistemic cultures. In C. Hines (ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: understanding e-science (pp. 100-115). Hershey, Idea Group.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985) . No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1994). Medium theory. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 50-77). Stanford: Stanford University.
Mitcham, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (Ed.) Detroit: Macmillan Reference usa.
Mitchell, R., & Thurtle, P. (2004). Data made flesh: Embodying information. ny: Routledge.
Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science Press.
Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 543-558.
Patterson, P., & Wilkins, L. (2004). Media ethics: Issues and cases (5th edition). ny: McGrawHill.
Phillips, R., & Freeman, E. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berlin: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Postman, Neil. (1992) Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Real, M. (1975). Cultural studies and mediated reality. Journal of Popular Culture 9 (2), 81-5.
Redding, W. C. (1996). Ethics and the study of organizational communication: When will we wake up? In J.A.J.M.S. Pritchard (Ed.), Responsible communication: Ethical issues in business, industry, and the professions (pp. 17-40). Cresskill, nk: Hampton Press.
Regan S. (1996). Is there free speech on the Internet? Censorship in the global Information infrastructure. In R. Shields (ed.) Cultures of Internet virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2004). Digital citizenship: Focus questions for implementation. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(2), 12-15.
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2007). Organization Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Roberts, L. D. (2008). Cyber identity theft. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 542-557). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the internet. Information, Communication & Society, 2, 521-540.
Sanders, K. (2003). Ethics and journalism. London: Sage Publications.
Schilling, G. (2000). The virtual observatory moves closer to reality. Science, 289, 238-239.
Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Duham: Duke University Press.
Sutherland, N., Isaacs, P., Graham, P., & McKenna, B. (eds.) (2008). Towards humane technologies: biotechnology, new media, and ethics. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Turtle, P. & Howard, P. (eds). (2002). Semiotic Flesh: information and the human body. Seatle: University of Washington Press.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2005). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Visala, S. (2008). Planning, interests, and argumentation. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (eds.) (2008). Handbook of research on technoethics (pp 103-110). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., &. Tolhurst, N. (eds.). (2008). The a to z of corporate social responsibility. New York: Wiley.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. (1975). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Schocken.
Wilson, C. (2005). Computer attack and cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and policy issues for Congress.
Cómo citar
Luppicini, R. (2009). La tecnoética de la información y la comunicación. Signo Y Pensamiento, 28(55), 32–49. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/signoypensamiento/article/view/4500
Sección
Agendas