Vol. 35 No. 71 (2018), Articles
Vol. 35 No. 71 (2018)

From the Mystery of Transcendence to the Awe of Donation: The Enigma in Husserl’s The Idea of Phenomenology

Articles
Published 2018-09-27
Hernán H. Inverso
Universidad de Buenos Aires / ANCBA-CONICET
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

phenomenology; Husserl; method; transcendence; donation

How to Cite

From the Mystery of Transcendence to the Awe of Donation: The Enigma in Husserl’s The Idea of Phenomenology. (2018). Universitas Philosophica, 35(71), 233-258. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uph35-71.tdeh
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The Idea of Phenomenology is the result of the first course in which Husserl presented disciplinary developments after the transcendental turn occurred around 1905. It is therefore not only an important document of this turning, but also a high-impact work on the subsequent phenomenological tradition. In this paper we study three aspects of the category of enigma (Rätsel): the way in which it characterizes transcendence, the figure of objectors and the issue of donation and its modes. This analysis will highlight unexplored aspects of transcendental phenomenology at its early stages.

PDF (Spanish)

Benoist, J. (2002). Husserl and Bolzano. En: A.T. Tymieniecka. (Ed. de la serie). Analecta Husserliana. The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research: Vol. 80. Phenomenology World-Wide (pp. 98-100). doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0473- 2_8
Beyer, C. (1996). Von Bolzano zu Husserl. Eine Untersuchung über den Ursprung der phänomenologischen Bedeutungslehre. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Biemel, W. (1956). Husserl, Persönliche Aufzeichnungen. Philosophy and Phe- nomenological Research, 16(3), 293-302.
Canto-Sperber, M. (1991). Traduction inédite, introduction et notes. Platon, Ménon. Paris: Flammarion.
De Muralt, A. (1974). The Idea of Phenomenology. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Drummond, J. (2005 [1975]). The Structure of Intentionality. En: R. Bernet, D. Welton, & G. Zavota. (Eds.). Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers (vol. 3) (pp. 31-60). London: Routledge.
Follesdal, D. (1978). Brentano and Husserl on Intentional Objects and Percep- tion. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 5, 83-94.
González Porta, M. (2010). Psicologismo e idealismo en Frege y Husserl. Capa, 117(37), 57-86.
Hamrick, W. (1985). Phenomenology in Practice and Theory. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hanna, R. (1993). Logical Cognition: Husserl’s Prolegomena and the Truth in Psychologism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Society, 53, 251-275.
Hardy, L. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Heidegger, M. (1976). [GA]. Gesamtausgabe, 9, Wegmarken. F.-M. von Herrmann (Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. [Hay edición en castellano: Heidegger, M. (2007). Hitos. (A. Leyte y H. Cortés, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza].
Husserl, E. (1950-2009). [Hua] Husserliana: Gesammelte Werke I-LX. Dordrecht: Springer [con anterioridad: Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; Dordrecht/ Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers].
Huemer, W. (2004). Husserl’s Critique of Psychologism and his Relation to the Brentano School. En: A. Chrudzimski & W. Huemer. (Eds.). Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy (pp. 199-214). Frankfurt: Ontos.
Inverso, H. (2014). “El espíritu absoluto debería tener también un cuerpo”. Una revisión de la relación entre epoché y corporalidad en Husserl y Merleau-Ponty. Devenires, 29, 63-82.
Inverso, H. (2015). El mundo entre paréntesis. Una arqueología de las nociones de reducción y corporalidad. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Inverso, H. (2016a). Fenomenología de lo inaparente (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Inverso, H. (2016b). La fenomenología de lo inaparente y el problema de las vías de acceso a lo trascendental. Eidos, 26, 43-73.
Kern, I. (1977). The Three Ways to the Transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. En: F. Elliston, et al. (Eds.). Husserl: Exposition and Appraisals (pp. 126-149). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Kuhn, H., Avé-Lallemant, E., & Gladiator, R. (Eds.). (1976). Die Münchner Phänomenologie. Halle: Phenomenologica.
Luft, S. (2004). Husserl’s Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction: Between Life-World and Cartesianism. Research in Phenomenology, 34(1), 198-234.
Mohanty, J. (2003). The Concept of ‘Psychologism’ in Frege and Husserl. En: D. Jacquette. (Ed.). Philosophy, Psychology and Psychologism (pp. 113-130). Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mohanty, J. (2005). Husserl’s Concept of Intentionality. En: R. Bernet, D. Wel- ton, & G. Zavota. (Eds.). Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers (vol. 3) (pp. 113-130). London: Routledge.
Nehamas, A. (1985). Meno’s Paradox and Socrates as a Teacher. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3, 1-30.
Rabanaque, L. (2011). Actitud natural y actitud fenomenológica. Sapientia, 67, 147-163.
Schuhmann, K. (1997). Philosophy and Art in Munich around the Turn of the Century. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 54, 35-51.
Sebestik, J. (2003). Husserl Reader of Bolzano. Husserl’s Logical Investiga- tions Reconsidered. Contribution to Phenomenology, 48, 59-81.
Seebohm, T. M. (1991). Psychologism Revisited. En: T. Seebohm, D. Föllesdall, & J. N. Mohanty. (Eds.). Phenomenology and the formal sciences (pp. 149- 182). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The Phenomenological Movement. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Staiti, A. (2012). The Pedagogic Impulse of Husserl’s Ways into Transcendental Phenomenology. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 33(1), 39-56.
Walton, R. (2006). La filosofía como ciencia estricta según Husserl. Anuario de filosofía jurídica y social, 21-53.
Walton,R.(2009).La intencionalidad. Sus modo y desvelamiento. En: N.Corona. (Ed.). La fenomenología. Sus orígenes, desarrollos y situación actual (pp. 11-38). Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Xolocotzi, A. (2009). Las cosas de la fenomenología. Notas sobre la idea husserliana de una filosofía científica. Acta fenomenológica latinoamericana, III, 121-137.
Zirión Quijano, A. (1989). La palabra de las cosas. Reflexiones sobre el lema “A las cosas mismas”. En: A. Zirión Quijano. (Comp.). Actualidad de Husserl (pp. 99-123). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Fun- dación Gutman/Alianza Editorial Mexicana.
Zirión Quijano, A. (1990). Breve diccionario analítico de conceptos husserlianos. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Zirión Quijano, A. (2003). La noción de fenomenología y el llamado a las cosas mismas. En: Á. Xolocotzi (Coord.). Hermenéutica y fenomenología. Primer Coloquio (pp. 31-58). México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.