Publicado Nov 8, 2019


Google Scholar
Search GoogleScholar

Viviana Andrea Gutierrez Rincon

José Javier Aguilar Zambrano

Javier Enrique Medina Vásquez



La interrelación entre cambio organizacional, tecnológico e institucional ha sido ampliamente estudiada desde diferentes teorías. Sin embargo, poco se ha explorado sobre ¿cómo con la introducción de una nueva tecnología se entrelazan las propiedades materiales de la tecnología con los arreglos sociales del contexto donde se implementan, generando cambios en las tecnologías, organizaciones e instituciones?, convirtiéndose en nuestra pregunta de investigación. El estudio parte de una revisión de teorías de cambio organizacional, institucional y tecnológico, identificando diferencias y complementariedades entre sus conceptos, generando así una propuesta teórica para analizar la interacción de actores no-humanos con las prácticas institucionalizadas de actores humanos en la implementación de tecnologías desde la Teoría Actor-Red y el Trabajo Institucional.


Teoría actor-red, trabajo institucional, cambio institucional, cambio tecnol´ógico, cambio organizacionalTeoria ator-rede, trabalho institucional, mudança institucional, mudança tecnológica, mudança organizacionalActor network theory, institutional work, institutional change, technological change, organizational change

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the University Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108.

Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, y B. Leca (eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 31-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

Beunza, D., & Ferraro, F. (2019). Performative work: Bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field. Organization Studies, 40(4), 515-543.

Bijker, W. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakekites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge.

Clemens, E., & Cook, J. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466.

Dancin, M., Goodstein, J., & Scott, R. (2002). Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: introduction to the special research Forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 43-56.

DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. En L. Zucker (Ed.) Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.

Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions think. London: Routledge.

Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. (2010). Technology, institutions and entropy: Understanding the critical and creative role of maintenance work. In Technology and organization: Essays in honour of Joan Woodward (v. 29, pp. 259-264). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

Gawer, A. & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of intel´s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035-1071.

Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27-48.

Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. (2002). Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.

Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.

Iacono, S., & Kling, R. (2001). Computerization movements: The rise of Internet and distant forms of work. In J. Yates & J. Van Maanen (eds.), Information technology and organizational transformation: History, rhetoric, and practice (pp. 93-136). California: Sage Publications.

Jones, C., & Massa, F. (2013). From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: unity temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1099-1136.

Kling, R. (1991). Computerization and Social Transformation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(3), 342-367.

Kling, R., & Iacono, S. (1988). The mobilization of support for computerization: The role of computerization movements. Social Problems, 35(3), 226-243.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1-30.

Latham, R. & Sassen, S. (2005). Digital formations: IT and new architectures in the global realm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientist and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social: una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Latour, B. (2015). Scientific Humanities. Material curso en Coursera (junio – julio 2015), desde

Law, J. (1992). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routlege Sociological Review Monograph.

Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology Studies (pp. 111-134). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lawrence, T., Leca, B. & Zilber, T. (2013). Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023-1033.

Lawrence, T. & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord, (eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254), 2nd ed. Londres: Sage Publications.

Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional Work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional Work: refocusing institutional studies of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.

Leonardi, P., & Barley, S. (2008). Materiality and change: challenges to build better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 159-176.

Leonardi, P., & Barley, S. (2010). What´s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 1-51.

Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: the decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148-178.

Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

Montero, P., & Nicolini, D. (2014). Recovering materiality in institutional work: prizes as an assemblage of human and material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1-21.

Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.

Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitututionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563-588.

Orlikowski, W. (2010). The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125-141.

Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474.

Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When Worlds Collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.

Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: living in a material world. Theory and Sociology, 37, 461-483.

Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441.

Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Powell, W., & Grodal, S. (2006) Networks of innovators (cap. 3). In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raviola, E., & Norback, M. (2013). Bringing technology and meaning into institutional work: Making news at an Italian business newspaper. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1171-1194.

Rindova, V., & Petkova, A. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18(2), 217-232.

Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-Network Theory and methodology: just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134-149.

Scott, R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, Second Edition. Londres: Sage Publications.
Scott, R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P., & Caronna, C. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Seo, M., & Creed, D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 232-247.

Suchman, L. (2007). Human–machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tryggestad, K., & Georg, S. (2011). How objects shape logics in construction. Culture and Organization, 17(3), 181-197.

Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.

Waldorff, S. (2013). Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(3), 219-234.

Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research policy, 25, 865-899.

Yang, G., & Wang, R. (2013). The Institutionalization of an Electronic Marketplace in China, 1998-2010. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 96-109.

Zammuto, R., Griffith, T., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749-762.
Cómo citar
Gutierrez Rincon, V. A., Aguilar Zambrano, J. J., & Medina Vásquez, J. E. (2019). Cambio organizacional, institucional y tecnológico: una aproximación desde la teoría actor-red y el trabajo institucional. Cuadernos De Administración, 32(59).