Publicado oct 29, 2020



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Alejandro Wilches-Segovia

Luis Antonio Orozco Castro http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-4500

César Yamit Beltrán Torres

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

Las grandes empresas buscan mejorar su legitimidad desde la revelación de información sobre su gestión no financiera en responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC). Sin embargo, la relación entre la estructura de la junta directiva y una mayor revelación de indicadores ambientales y sociales, dada una estructura de propiedad y un nivel de reputación corporativa, no ha sido estudiada, especialmente en economías emergentes. Usando el debate entre la teoría de la agencia y de dependencia de recursos con una muestra de 115 empresas listadas en Merco Colombia, esta investigación concluye con un análisis multivariado que el tamaño, la independencia y los comités de ética, gobierno y sostenibilidad inciden en la revelación en el Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sobre RSC en empresas no familiares con alta reputación.

Keywords

Gobierno Corporativo, Junta Directiva, Responsabilidad Social Corporativa, Sostenibilidad, Reputación Corporativa, GRI, Empresa Familiar, Reporte no FinancieroCorporate Governance, Board of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, Corporate Reputation, GRI, Family Business, Non-financial ReportingGovernança Corporativa, Conselho de Administração, Responsabilidade Social Corporativa, Sustentabilidade, Reputação Corporativa, GRI, Empresa Familiar, Relatório Não Financeiro

References
Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2016). Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(3), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001
Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
Arayssi, M., Dah, M., & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2015-0055
Arnone, L., Ferauge, P., Geerts, A., & Pozniak, L. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: Internet as communication tool towards stakeholders. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7(7), 697. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Corporate-Social-Responsibility%EF%BC%9A-Internet-as-Tool-Laurent-Amone/e6b4f08bfde515916f367ab69c95c57ee6fc5a41?p2df
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
Boone, A. L., Casares Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004
Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
Chang, Y. K., Oh, W., Park, J. H., & Jang, M. G. (2017). Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2651-z
Cuadrado, B., García, R., & Martínez, J. (2015). Efecto de la composición del consejo de administración en las prácticas de responsabilidad social corporativa. Revista de Contabilidad, 18(1), 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.02.003
Danvila del Valle, I., Diez Esteban, J. M., & López-de-Foronda, O. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee Inside the Board. SSRN Working Paper Series, 34, 1-30. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2260382
De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506
Dienes, D., & Velte, P. (2016). The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting. Evidence from the German two-tier system. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010063
Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014-0050
Eccles, R. G., Iannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 6, 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1329
Freeman, E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233-236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932
Fuentes, J. A., García-Sanchez, I. M., & Lozano, M. B. (2017). The role of the board of directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 737-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155
Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2017a). Sustainability reporting in family firms: A panel data analysis. Sustainability, 9(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010038
Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2017b). The effect of equity and bond issues on sustainability disclosure. Family vs non-family Italian firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0066
Gennari, F., & Salvioni, D. M. (2019). CSR committees on boards: The impact of the external country level factors. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(3), 759-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9442-8
Giannarakis, G. (2014). Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008
Global Reporting Initiative (2016). Conjunto consolidado de Estándares GRI para la elaboración de informes de sostenibilidad. Global Reporting Initiative, 1-444. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-translations/gri-standards-spanish-translations-download-center/?g=7cbb8b53-11cd-4489-8de7-2bc7c2b86253
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). Guía para la elaboración de memorias de sostenibilidad. Manual de aplicación. Versión G4. Recuperado de https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Spanish-G4-Part-Two.pdf
Herda, D. N., Taylor, M. E. & Winterbotham, G. (2012). The effect of board independence on the sustainability reporting practices of large U. S. firms. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 6(2), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v6i2.69
Herrera-Echeverri, H., Gaitan, S., Orozco, L A., & Soto-Echeverry, N. (2018). Board Characteristics, Compliance, and Firm Performance: Empirical Findings from Colombia. Latin American Business Review, 19(3-4), 263-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2018.1540935
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
Hsueh, J. W. J. (2018). Governance structure and the credibility gap: Experimental evidence on family businesses’ sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3409-y
Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710759406
Iyer, V., & Lulseged, A. (2013). Does family status impact US firms' sustainability reporting? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(2), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-Nov-2011-0032
Janggu, T., Darus, F., Zain, M. M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020
Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2
Kiliç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2014-0022
Klein, S. B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 13(3), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00157.x
Lorenzo, J. M., Sánchez, I. M. G., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2009). Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de responsabilidad social corporativa. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de financiación y Contabilidad, 38(141), 107-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2009.10779664
Michelon, G. (2011). Sustainability disclosure and reputation: A comparative study. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2011.10
Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
Nieto, M., Fernández, R., & Cabeza, L. (2012). La RSC en la relación entre composición del consejo y valor de mercado de la empresa. Papeles de Economía Española, (132), 315-328. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/extart?codigo=3976069
Orozco, L. A., Vargas, J., & Galindo-Dorado, R. (2018). Trends on the relationship between board size and financial and reputational corporate performance: The Colombian case. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0029
Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00028-4
Patten, D. M. (2019). Seeking legitimacy. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0332
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393956
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231527
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
Pugliese, A., Minichilli, A., & Zattoni, A. (2014). Integrating agency and resource dependence theory: Firm profitability, industry regulation, and board task performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.003
Sageder, M., Mitter, C., & Feldbauer, B. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: A systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 335-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0216-x
Shamil, M. M., Shaikh, J. M., Ho, P. L., & Krishnan, A. (2014). The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(2), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0060
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (2007). Código País. Sección 2. Junta Directiva subsección 2.1 Tamaño, conformación y funcionamiento. Recuperado de https://www.superfinanciera.gov.co/SFCant/Codigopais/juntadirectiva.htm
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
Cómo citar
Wilches-Segovia, A., Orozco Castro, L. A., & Beltrán Torres, C. Y. (2020). Estructura de las juntas directivas y divulgación de la responsabilidad social corporativa: El caso de las empresas más reputadas en Colombia. Cuadernos De Administración, 33. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao33.ejdd
Sección
Edición regular