Palabras clave
reinserción al trabajo
jubilación
adulto mayor
salud
género
Cómo citar
Resumen
Introducción: Es necesario reconceptualizar las viejas y nuevas formas de trabajo en la vejez, ante las nuevas realidades que viven las personas mayores que deciden o necesitan seguir trabajando después de la jubilación. Objetivo: Describir las motivaciones para acceder a un trabajo puente en las personas mayores jubiladas. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio de investigación documental utilizando la metodología de Arskey y O’Malley para revisiones panorámicas. Se definió una pregunta para la revisión de la literatura, construida a partir de tres elementos centrales: a) población objetivo, b) tema prioritario y c) pronóstico. Resultados: Se apreció que no existe una motivación única para que las personas adultas mayores jubiladas accedan al trabajo puente. Las motivaciones son diversas y se pueden relacionar con motivos personales-familiares, estructurales-organizacionales, culturales-sociales y estado de salud. De estas, destacan el estado de salud, la situación económica, el nivel educativo, la disponibilidad de lugares de trabajo y el género. Conclusiones: Esta apertura del panorama que ha prevalecido en la última década en cuestión del trabajo puente es una pincelada de un fenómeno que requiere ser abordado a mayor profundidad en futuras investigaciones desde diversas áreas del conocimiento.
1. Anderson L, Jiankun S. The changing face of retirement: exploring retirees’ communicative construction of tensions through bridge employment. Commun Stud. 2018;69(2): p. 196-212. DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2018.1437056.
2. Londoño AM, Díaz F. Postcarrera: una experiencia de los jubilados en trabajos puente. Psicoperspectivas. 2019;18(2): p. 109-121. DOI: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol18-issue2-fulltext-1508
3. Dendinger VM, Adams GA, Jacobson JD. Reasons for Working and Their Relationship to Retirement Attitudes, Job Satisfaction and Occupational Self-Efficacy of Bridge Employees. The Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2005;61(1): 21-35. DOI: 10.2190/K8KU-46LH-DTW5-44TU
4. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Organización Internacional del Trabajo. La inserción laboral de las personas mayores: necesidades y opciones. Coyuntura Laboral en América Latina y el Caribe. 2018;(18): p. 5-48. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43603/1/S1800398_es.pdf
5. Pereira de Souza A, de Freitas Pinho, França L. H. Construção e evidências de validade da escala de motivos para continuar trabalhando na aposentadoria. Ciencias Psicológicas. 2020;14(2): p. 2261. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=459565063010
6. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Estadísticas a propósito del día internacional de las personas adultas mayores (comunicado núm. 568/22). [citado 2022 dic. 22]. México:INEGI; 2022. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/aproposito/2022/EAP_ADULMAY2022.pdf
7. Sousa I, Ramos S, Carvalho H. What could make me stay at work: retirement transition profiles. Curr Psychol. 2021;42(2021): p. 6,302-6,314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4675-z
8. Román-Sánchez Y, Montoya-Arce BJ, Gaxiola-Robles SC, Lozano-Keymolen D. Los adultos mayores y su retiro del mercado laboral en México. Sociedad y Economía. 2019;(37): p. 87-113. https://doi.org/10.25100/sye.v0i37.7823
9. Torka N, Goedegebure I, van Ewijk I, Looise JK. On the motives and needs for work beyond age 65: comparing voluntary workers versus agency workers. German Journal of Human Resource Management. 2018;26(2): p. 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221202600208
10. Super DE. A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1980;16: p. 282-298
11. Savickas ML. The theory and practice of career construction. En: Brown D.; Lent, RW., editors. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005. p. 42-70.
12. Fouad N, Byars-Winston A. Cultural context of career choice: meta analysis of race differences. Career Development Quarterly. 2005; 53: p. 223-233
13. Dawis, RV, England GW, Lofquist LH. A theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minesota, Minneapolis Industrial Relations Center; 1964. Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation: XV.
14. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1994; 45: p. 79-122
15. Lytle M, Foley P, Cotter E. Career and retirement theories: relevance for older workers across cultures. J Career Dev. 2015;42(3): p. 185-198. DOI: 10.1177/0894845314547638
16. Cumming E, Dean LR, Newell DS, McCaffrey I. Disengagement: A tentative theory of aging. Sociometry. 1960; 23(1): p. 23-35
17. Atchley RC. A continuity theory of normal aging. The gerontologist. 1989; 29(2): p. 183-190
18. Mead GH. The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods. 1913; 10(14): p. 374-380
19. Arskey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8(1): p. 19-32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
20. Guix, J. El análisis de contenidos: ¿qué nos están diciendo? Revista de Calidad Asistencial. 2008, 23(1):p. 26-30. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-pdf-S1134282X08704640
21. Medina IE, Chávez A, Marín IA, Córdova PJ, Hernández NE, Mireles MF, García PY. Trabajo y vejez: significados del trabajo para los adultos mayores de Guadalajara. Investigación y práctica en psicología del desarrollo. 2016;(2): p. 186-200. https://revistas.uaa.mx/index.php/ippd/article/view/688/665
22. Ramos G, Tirado E. Hasta que el cuerpo aguante. Trayectorias, rutinas y motivaciones laborales de trabajadores adultos mayores de la ciudad de Lima, Perú. Bulletin de I’Institut francais d’études andines. 2019;48(3): p. 1-27. DOI: 10.4000/bifea.1107823. Bennett M, Beehr T, Lepisto L. Longitudinal study of work after retirement: examining predictors of bridge employment, continued career employment and retirement. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2016;0(0): p. 1-28. DOI: 10.1177/0091415016652403
24. Quijano A. El trabajo. Argumentos. 2013;26(72): p. 145-163. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59528835008
25. Leinonen A. Master of their time? Working careers’ visions of retirement. Eur J Ageing. 2011; 8: p. 243-253. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-011-0200-x
26. Lanchimba C, Quinsnancela J, Salazar Y. The choice of elderly labor: evidence from Ecuador. Rev de Análisis Económico. 2020;35(1): p. 75-97. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rae/v35n1/0718-8870-rae-35-01-75.pdf
27. Porcellato L, Carmichael F, Hulme C, Ingham B, Prashar A. Giving older workers a voice: constraints on the employment of older people in Northwest England. Work Employ Soc. 2010;24(1): p. 85-103. DOI: 10.1177/0950017009353659.
28. George R, Maguire M. Academics “Staying on” post retirement age in English university departments of education: opportunities, threats employment policies. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2021;69(4): p. 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2020.1814951
29. Bouwhuis S, de Wind A, de Kruif A, Geuskens GA, Van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM, Boot C. Experiences with multiple job holding: a qualitative study among Dutch older workers. BMC Public Health. 2018;18: p. 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5841-7
30. Oteng S, Manful E, Akuoko K. Retiring in the informal economy: implications for social policy intervention for ageing workers in Ghana, Ageing Int. 2022;47: p. 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-021-09434-w
31. Meyers R. Opportunities or barriers? The experiences of disadvantaged older jobseekers participating in training, International Journal of Training Research, 2016;14(1), p. 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2016.1152032
32. Beehr T, Bennett M. Working after retirement: features of bridge employment and research directions. Work Aging and Retirement.2015;1(1); p. 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wau007
33. Van der Zwaan G, Oude K, Sewdas R, De wind A, Steenbeek R, Van der Beek A, Boot C. The role of personal characteristics, work environmental and context in working beyond retirement: a mixed methods study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019;92: p. 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1387-3
34. Myllyntausta S, Virtanen M, Pentti J, Kivimaki, M., Vahtera, J., & Stenholm, S. Why do men extend their employment beyond pensionable age more often women? A cohort study. Eur J Ageing. 2022;19: p. 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00663-1
35. Feldman D, Beehr T. A three-phase model of retirement decision making. Am. Psychol. 2011;66(3), p. 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022153
36. Li H, Sun D, Wan Z, Chen J, Sun J. The perceptions of older nurses regarding continuing to work in a nursing career after retirement: a qualitative study in two Chinese hospitals of different levels. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;105(2020): p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103554
37. Nobahar M, Ahmadi F, Alhani F, Khoskknab M. Work to retirement: Exploration of the experiences of Iranian retired nurses, Work. 2015;51(2015): p. 807-816. DOI 10.3233/WOR-141943
38. Pleau R. Gender differences in post-retirement employment. Res Aging. 2010;32(2): p. 267-303. DOI: 10.1177/0164027509357706
39. Afonso, M. Las construcciones identitarias en el trabajo en la contemporaneidad: retrato de un grupo de trabajadores de Sao Paulo. Psykhe. 2012;2: p. 61-75. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=96725078006
40. Bratun U, Asaba E. Experiences and motives of retirement-aged workers during the first wave of COVID-19 in Slovenia: “This was the first time in 40 years that I really saw spring”. J Aging Stud. 2021; p. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100954
41. Rinsky-Halivni L, Hovav B, Christiani D, Brammli-Greenberg S. Aging workforce with reduced work capacity: From organizational challenges to succesfull accommodations productivity and well-being. Soc Sci Med. 2022;312(2022): p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115369
42. Vickerstaff S, Van der Horst M. The impact of age stereotypes and age norms on employees´ retirement choices: a neglected aspect of research on extended working lives, Front Sociol. 2021;6: p. 686645. DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2021.686645
43. Bjorklund A, Jacobsson G, Bjursell C, Nystedt P, Sternang O. Sttafing agency: a bridge to working during retirement. Work. 2022;72: p. 529-537. DOI:10.3233/WOR-205255
44. Dong W, Jie Z, Yimeng C, Qingsen H, Xiao G. Job crafting and organizational resources support impact on older workers’ bridge employment intentions: the role of psychological contract types. Curr Psychol 2024;2024(43), p. 8931-8946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05061-7
45. De Wind A, Geuskens G, Reeuwijk K, Westerman M, Fekk J, Burdorf A, Bongers P, van der Beek A. Pathways through which health influences early retirement: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13: p. 2-9. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/292
46. Neary J, Vital S, Brown J, Macdonald E, Thomson H. Role of age and health in perceptions of returning to work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19: p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6819-9
47. Sewdas R, de Wind A, van der Zwaan L, van der Borg W, Steenbeek R, van der Beek A, Boot C. Why older workers work beyond the retirement age: qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17: p. 1-10. DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4675-z
48. Eagers J, Franklin R, Broome K, Yau M. The experiences of work: retirees’ perspectives and relationship to the role of occupational therapy in the work-to-retirement transition process, Work. 2019;64(2): p. 341-354. DOI:10.3233/WOR-192996
49. Hovbrandt P, Carlsson G, Nilsson K, Albin M, Hakansson C. Occupational balance as described by older workers over the age of 65. J Occup Sci. 2019;26(1): p. 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1542616
50. Tur-Sinai A, Shahrabani S, Lowenstein A, Katz R, Halperin D, Fogel-Grinvald H. What drives older adults to continue working after official retirement age? Ageing Soc. 2022;(2022): p. 1-27. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X22000915
51. Sullivan S, Ariss A. Employment after retirement: a review and framework for future research. J Manage. 2019;45(1): p. 262-284. DOI: 10.1177/0149206318810411
52. Dingemans E, Henkens K, van Solinge H. Working retirees in Europe: individual and societal determinants. Work Employ Soc. 2017;31(6): p. 972-991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016664677
53. Nemoto Y, Takahashi T, Nonaka K, Hasebe M, Koike T, Minami U, Murayama H, Matsunga H, Kobayashi E, Fujiwara Y. Working for only financial reasons attenuates the health effects of working beyond retirement age: a 2-year longitudinal study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;35(2): p. 745-751. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13941
54. Oleksiyenko O, Zyczynska-Ciolek D. Structural determinants of workforce participation after retirement. Population Ageing. 2018;11: p. 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-017-9213-3
55. Settels J, McMullin J. Gender and relationship status interaction and likelihood of return work postretirement. Can J Aging. 2017;36(3): p. 366-385. DOI:10.1017/S0714980817000204
56. Beutell N, Schneer J. Working beyond retirement: are the gender differences in bridge employment? Ageing Int. 2021;46: p. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-020-09363-0
57. Neary J, Vital S, Brown J, Macdonald E, Thomson H. Role of age and health in perceptions of returning to work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6819-9
58. Hess M, Naegele L, Macken J. Attitudes towords working in retirement: a latent analysis of older workers’ motives. Eur J Ageing. 2021;18: p. 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00584-5
59. Miralles I. Productive aging: the contributions of older people from everyday life. Trabajo y Sociedad. 2011;16(15): p. 137-161. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=387334688009
60. Leime A. Older women public sector workers in Ireland: decisions about retirement time. J Women Aging. 2017;29(5): p. 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2016.1196079
61. Zhan Y, Shi J, Wang M. Retirees’ motivational orientations and bridge employment: testing the moderating role of gender. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(5): p. 1319-1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038731
62. Massingham P. Generational differences in work values and attitudes: reintroducing retirees to the workforce. J Popul Ageing. 2019;12(2019): p. 491-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-019-09250-w
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 José Rosario González Ulloa, Dra. , Dra. Cecilia Andrea Ordóñez-Hernández, Dra. Georgina Vega Fregoso, Dr. Ricardo Fletes Corona