Abstract
Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics
of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the
economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical
insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and
gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and
empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced
demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work
on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining
more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree
of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi
markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British
health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian
global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health
economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright notice
The Journal Management and Health Policies is registered under the Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the name of the authors and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are recognized. It is allowed to quote, adapt, transform, autoarchive, republish and create from the material, for any purpose (including commercial), provided that authorship is properly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided and if changes have been mad. The Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not retain the rights over published works and the contents are the exclusive responsibility of the authors, who preserve their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights.
The endorsement of the intervention of the work (revision, style correction, translation, layout) and its subsequent disclosure is granted through a license to use and not through a transfer of rights, which means that the journal and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana disclaims any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct on the part of the authors. As a result of the protection provided by the license for use, the journal is not obliged to publish retractions or modify the information already published, unless the erratum arises from the process of editorial management. The publication of contents in this magazine does not represent royalties for taxpayers.