Resumo
Segurança e saúde no trabalho tradicionalmente têm se abordado desde diferentes disciplinas, mais predomina o enfoque desde as ciências da saúde. Por tal razão, o objetivo da presente revisão é estabelecer qual a contribuição e abordagem desde as ciências económicas no campo da segurança e a saúde no trabalho. Para isso, realizou-se pesquisa sistemática de literatura em bases de dados como Econlit, jstor, PubMed, isi e Scopus. Para a análise da informação elaboraram-se fichas de conteúdo e uma matriz resumo, aliás, um mapa foi construído para identificar as principais temáticas abordadas, as quais se relacionam com avaliações econômicas
das intervenções em segurança e saúde no trabalho, os sistemas de gestão em saúde laboral, o relacionamento entre saúde e produtividade e os custos do acidente e da doença ocupacional.
2. Järvholm B, Albin M, Johansson G, Wadensjö E. Perspectives of working life research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009; 35 (5): 394-6.
3. Oficina Internacional del Trabajo. Estrategia global en materia de seguridad y salud en el trabajo.
Conclusiones adoptadas por la Conferencia Internacional del Trabajo en su 91a reunión; 2003.
4. Goetzel R. Health and productivity management II, measuring and reporting workforce productivity,
best practice report. Houston; 1999.
5. Filer RK, Golbe DL. Debt, operating margin, and investment in workplace safety. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 2003; 51(3): 359-81.
6. Férnandez B, Montes JM, Vásquez C. Incidencia de la gestión preventiva de los riesgos laborales en la competitividad de las empresas españolas. Dirección y Organización, Revista de Ingeniería de Organización. 2007; 33; 5-20.
7. Mossink J, De Greef M. Inventory of socioeconomic costs of work accidents, report. Luxemburgo;
2002.
8. Chicaiza L, García M. Guía de fuentes para la investigación en ciencias económicas. Bogotá; 2011.
9. Creswell J. Research design. Qualitative, quantiative and mixed methods approaches, tercera
edición. California: Sage; 2009.
10. Kankaanpää E. Economic incentives as a policy tool to promote safety and health at work. Scandinavian
Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2010; 36 (4): 319-24.
11. Kankaanpaa E, Suhonen A, Valtonen H. Does the company’s economic performance affect access to
occupational health services? bmc Healtn Services Research. 2009; 9.
12. Kankaanpää E, Suhonen A, Valtonen H. Promoting prevention with economic arguments - The case of
Finnish occupational health services. bmc Public Health. 2008; 8.
13. Kankaanpää E, Van Tulder AM, De Greef M. Economics for occupational safety and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2008; 5 (Supl.): 9-13.
14. Tompa E, Verbeek J, Van Tulder M, De Boer A. Developing guidelines for good practice in the economic evaluation of occupational safety and health interventions. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2010; 36 (4): 313-8.
15. Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira R, Irvin E. A systematic review of occupational health and safety interventions with economic analyses. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 51 (9): 1004-23.
16. Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira C. Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplacebased
interventions for occupational health and safety. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2006; 16 (3): 375-400.
17. Uegaki K, de Bruijne MC, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W, van Tulder MW. Economic evaluations
of occupational health interventions from a company’s perspective: A systematic review of methods to estimate the cost of health-related productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2011; 21 (1): 90-9.
18. Uegaki K, Bruijne M, Lambeek L. Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective - a systematic review of methodological quality. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2010; 36 (4): 273-88.
19. Uegaki K, Bruijne M, Anema JR, Van der Beek A, Van Tulder M, Van Mechelen W. Consensus-based finding and recommendations for estimating the costs of health-related productivity loss from a company’s
perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2007; 33 (2): 122-30.
20. Miller P, Haslam C. Why employers spend money on employee health: Interviews with occupational
health and safety professionals from British Industry. Safety Science. 2009; 47 (2): 163-9.
21. Miller P, Rossiter P, Nuttall D. Demonstrating the economic value of occupational health services. Occupational Medicine-Oxford. 2002; 8: 477-83.
22. Verbeek J. The economic dimension of occupational safety and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2009; 35 (6): 401-2.
23. Verbeek J, Pulliainen M, Kankaanpää E. A systematic review of occupational safety and health business cases. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2009; 35 (6): 403-12.
24. Meijster T, Van Duuren-Stuurman B, Heederik D, Houba R, Koningsveld E, Warren N, et al. Cost-benefit analysis in occupational health: A comparison of intervention scenarios for occupational asthma and rhinitis among bakery workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011; 68 (10): 739-45.
25. Micheli G, Cagno E. Dealing with smes as a whole in ohs issues: Warnings from empirical evidence. Safety Science. 2010; 48 (6): 729-33.
26. Linhard JB. Understanding the return on health, safety and environmental investments. Journal of Safety Research. 2005; 36 (3): 257-60.
27. Davies R, Jones P, Nuñez I. The impact of the business cycle on occupational injuries in the uk. Social Science and Medicine. 2009; 69 (2): 178-82.
28. Loomis D, Schulman M, Bailer A, Stainback K, Wheeler M, Richardson D, et al. Political economy of us states and rates of fatal occupational injury. American Journal of Public Health. 2009; 99 (8): 1400-8.
29. Boone J, Van Ours JC. Are recessions good for workplace safety? Journal of Health Economics. 2006; 25 (6): 1069-93.
30. De la Fuente VS, López MAC, González I, Alcántara OJG, Ritzel DO. The impact of the economic crisis on occupational injuries. Journal of Safety Research. 2014; 48: 77-85.
31. Suhrcke M, McKee M, Stuckler D, Sauto Arce R, Tsolova S, Mortensen J. The contribution of health to the economy in the European Union. Public Health. 2006; 120 (11): 994-1001.
32. Takala J, Urrutia M, Hämäläinen P, Saarela K. The global and European work environment - Numbers, trends, and strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2009; 7 (Supl.): 15-23.
33. Landsbergis PA. Assessing the contribution of working conditions to socioeconomic disparities in health: A commentary. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2010; 53 (2): 95-103.
34. Elsler D, Treutlein D, Rydlewska I, Frusteri L, Krüger H, Veerman T, et al. A review of case studies evaluating economic incentives to promote occupational safety and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2010; 36 (4): 289-98.
35. Bolin K, Jacobson L, Lindgren B. Employer investments in employee health implications for the family as health producer. Journal of Health Economics. 2002; 21 (4): 563-83.
36. Cherniack M, Lahiri S. Barriers to implementation of workplace health interventions: An economic
perspective. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010; 52 (9): 934-42.
37. Antonopoulou L, Targoutzidis A. Economie evaluation of prevention programmes for occupational health and safety: The pertinence of cost-benefit analysis. Sante Publique. 2010; 22 (1): 23-35.
38. Oxenburgh M, Marlow P. The Productivity Assessment Tool: Computer-based cost benefit analysis model for the economic assessment of occupational health and safety interventions in the workplace. Journal of Safety Research. 2005; 36 (3): 209-14.
39. Rzepecki J. Cost and benefits of implementing an occupational safety and health management system (osh ms) in interprises in Poland. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2012; 18 (2): 181-193.
40. Baxter S, Sanderson K, Venn AJ, Blizzard CL, Palmer AJ. The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2014; 28 (6): 347-63.
41. Ramos DG, Arezes PM, Afonso P. Economic analysis of occupational risk prevention: A case study in a textile company. In: Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference; 2014. p. 1473-8.
42. Lim K. Health and economic impact of occupational health services. Scandinavian Journal of Work,
Environment & Health. 2005; 1 (Suppl): 38-42.
43. Robson LS, Clarke JA, Cullen K, Bielecky A, Severin C, Bigelow PL, et al. The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Safety Science. 2007; 45 (3): 329-53.
44. Soklaridis S, Cassidy J, Van Der Velde G, Tompa E, Hogg-Johnson S. The economic cost of return to work: An employer’s perspective. Work. 2012; 43 (3): 255-62.
45. Biddle EA, Ray TK, Owusu-Edusei Jr K, Camm T. Synthesis and recommendations of the economic evaluation of ohs interventions at the company level conference. Journal of Safety Research. 2005; 36 (3): 261-7.
46. Cagno E, Micheli GJL, Masi D, Jacinto C. Economic evaluation of osh and its way to smes: A constructive
review. Safety Science. 2013; 53: 134-52.
47. Niven KJM. A review of the application of health economics to health and safety in healthcare. Health Policy. 2002; 61 (3): 291-304.
48. Bergström M. The potential-method-an economic evaluation tool. Journal of Safety Research. 2005;
36 (3): 237-40.
49. Van Dongen JM, van Wier MF, Tompa E, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ, van Tulder MW, et al. Trialbased
economic evaluations in occupational health: principles, methods, and recommendations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine /American College of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine. 2014; 56 (6): 563-72.
50. Van Dongen JM, Tompa E, Clune L, SarnocinskaHart A, Bongers PM, van Tulder MW, et al. Bridging the gap between the economic evaluation literature and daily practice in occupational health: a qualitative study among decision-makers in the healthcare sector. Implementation Science. 2013; 8 (1): 57.
51. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Scott-Dixon K, Facey M, Chambers L, Breslin C, et al. Workplace health
understandings and processes in small businesses: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2010; 20 (2): 180-98.
52. Saracino A, Spadoni G, Curcuruto M, Guglielmi D, Bocci VM, Cimarelli M, et al. A new model for evaluating occupational health and safety management systems (ohsms). Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2012; 26: 519-24.
53. Jallon R, Imbeau D, De Marcellis-Warin N. Development of an indirect-cost calculation model suitable
for workplace use. Journal of Safety Research. 2011; 42 (3): 149-64.
54. Pauly M, Nicholson S, Polsky D, Berger M, Sharda C. Valuing reductions in on-the-job illness: “Presenteeism”
from managerial and economic perspectives. Health Economics. 2008; 17 (4): 469-85.
55. Heymann J, Rho H, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: Comparing the
generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. International Journal of Health
Services. 2010; 40 (1): 1-22.
56. Kirsten W. Making the link between health and productivity at the workplace - A global perspective.
Industrial Health. 2010; 48 (3): 251-5.
57. Goetzel RZ, Guindon AM, Turshen I, Ozminkowski RJ. Health and productivity management: Establishing
key performance measures, benchmarks, and best practices. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43 (1): 10-7.
58. Alavinia SM, Molenaar D, Burdorf A. Productivity Loss in the Workforce: Associations With Health, Work Demands, and Individual Characteristics. Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2009; 52 (1): 49-56.
59. Zhang W, Bansback N, Anis AH. Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: A critical review. Social Science and Medicine. 2011; 72 (2): 185-92.
60. Elsler D, Eeckelaert L. Factors influencing the transferability of occupational safety and health economic incentive schemes between different countries. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2010; 36 (4): 325-31.
61. Fernández-Muñiz B, Montes-Peón JM, VásquezOrdás CJ. Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Safety Science. 2009; 47: 980-91.
62. Narocki Flaminman C. Si la prevención es rentable ¿por qué no lo han descubierto los empresarios? Una
revisión de propuestas para políticas en salud laboral. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales. 1999; 14: 101-33.
63. Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. Encuesta Europea de Empresas sobre Riesgos
Nuevos y Emergentes - Esener. Bélgica; 2010.
64. Drummond M, Dubois D, Garattini L. Methods for the Economic Evaluation in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
65. Van Roijen L, Essink-Bot M, Koopmanschap M. Labour and health status in economic evaluation of health care: The Health Labour Questionnaire. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996; 12 (3): 405-15.
66. Verbeek J, Pulliainen M, Kankaanpaa E, Taimela S. Transferring results of occupational safety and health cost-efectiveness studies from one country to another - case study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010; 36 (4): 305-12.
Aviso de direitos autorais
A revista Gerencia y Políticas de Salud está registrada sob a licença Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International. Portanto, este trabalho pode ser reproduzido, distribuído e comunicado publicamente em formato digital, desde que o nome dos autores e da Pontificia Universidad Javeriana sejam reconhecidos. É permitido citar, adaptar, transformar, autoarquivar, republicar e criar a partir do material, para qualquer finalidade (inclusive comercial), desde que a autoria seja devidamente reconhecida, e um link do trabalho original seja fornecido e indicar se as alterações tiverem sido feitas. A Pontificia Universidad Javeriana não detém os direitos sobre os trabalhos publicados e os conteúdos são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, que preservam seus direitos morais, intelectuais, de privacidade e de publicidade.
O endosso da intervenção do trabalho (revisão, correção de estilo, tradução, layout) e sua posterior divulgação são concedidos através de uma licença para uso e não através de uma transferência de direitos, o que significa que a revista e a Pontificia Universidad Javeriana se eximem de qualquer responsabilidade que podem surgir de má conduta ética por parte dos autores. Como resultado da proteção fornecida pela licença de uso, a revista não é obrigada a publicar retratações ou modificar as informações já publicadas, a menos que a errata surja do processo de gestão editorial. A publicação dos conteúdos desta revista não representa regalias para os contribuintes.