Palabras clave
agentes de software
indexación
objetos de aprendizaje
LCMS
reutilización
metadatos
web semántica
indexación
objetos de aprendizaje
LCMS
reutilización
metadatos
web semántica
Cómo citar
Modelo de intercambio de objetos de aprendizaje entre plataformas LCMS mediante agentes inteligentes. (2015). Ingenieria Y Universidad, 19(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.iyu19-2.mloe
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Resumen
Actualmente existe una gran variedad de recursos digitales alojados en Internet a partir de puntos de acceso como bibliotecas digitales y repositorios. La mayoría de estas estrategias, definidas por centros de documentación especializados, instituciones académicas e iniciativas o planes de acción regionales, han estado orientando sus esfuerzos a facilitar el acceso a materiales con fines de uso académicos o profesional. Sin embargo, existe todavía una gran cantidad de materiales educativos que se encuentran alojados en herramientas de gestión de contenidos conocidas como LCMS, y que carecen de una indexación en sus recursos a partir del uso repositorios. Esta necesidad reduce su uso, exclusivamente dentro de cada institución y pierden alcance y reconocimiento en otros ambientes de aprendizaje con mayor cobertura para su reutilización. Este aislamiento también limita el enriquecimiento y vinculación de material académico relevante en un área de conocimiento específico mediante el uso de estrategias como Linked Data. Por lo tanto, el artículo se orienta a plantear una estrategia para la indexación de recursos digitales alojados en diferentes LCMS mediante la definición de servicios que faciliten el intercambio de recursos digitales y su posterior reutilización. Caso de estudio: plataformas Efront y Moodle.
[1] T. Berners-Lee, “Linked data-the story so far”, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 2009.
[2] S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. Ives, “Dbpedia. A nucleus for a web of open data”, in The semantic web, Philadelphia: Springer, 2007, pp. 722-735.
[3] Open Discovery Space (ODS), Open Discovery Space, 2015 [online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/apps/projects/factsheet/index.cfm?project_ref=297229.Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[4] M. Fakhimi, L. Stergioulas, et al. “Methodology and evaluation framework for measuring impact of and e-learning platform”, EDULEARN14 Proceedings: 2150-2155, 2014.
[5] Europeana, Europeana professional, 2015 [online]. Available: http://pro.europeana.eu. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[6] B. Haslhofer and A. Isaac, “data.European.eu: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot”, in Proc. Of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Sep 21-23, 2011, The Hague, Netherlands, 2011.
[7] A. Miles, B. Matthews, M. Wilson, and D. Brickley, “SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web” in Proc. at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications “Metadata Vocabularies in Practice”, Sep. 12-15, 2005, Leganés, Madrid, Spain.
[8] J. Lacasta, J. Nogueras-Iso, et al., “ThManager. An open source tool for creating and visualizing SKOS”. Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 39-51, 2013.
[9] M. Hearst, Search user interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[10] M. Khoo, D. Kusunoki, and C. MacDonald, “Finding Problems. When Digital Library Users Act as Usability Evaluators”, in Proc. at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, Jan 4-7, 2012.
[11] H. Kim and Y. Kim, “Usability study of digital institutional repositories”, Electronic Library, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 863-881, 2008.
[12] LOM, “LOM Standard. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata”, in IEEE P1484.12/D4.0, 2003 [online]. Available: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/20020612-Final-LOM-Draft.html. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[13] SCORM, SCORM, Sharable Content Object Reference Model, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.adlnet.org/. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[14] C. Cechinel, S. Sánchez, and M. Sicilia, “Empirical analysis of errors on human-generated learning objects metadata”, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 46, pp. 60-70, 2009.
[15] J. Fernández, “Modelos de recuperación de información basados en redes de creencia”, tesis doctoral, Universidad de Granada, España, 2001.
[16] J. Pastor, “Diseño de un sistema colaborativo para la creación y gestión de tesauros en Internet basado en SKOS” PhD thesis, 2009.
[17] F. O. Bello-Pérez y J. N. Pérez-Castillo, “Interoperabilidad entre los dominios de la arquitectura, la ingeniería y la construcción y los sistemas de información geográfica1”, Ingeniería y Universidad, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 183-200, 2012.
[18] M. L. Nelson, “Better interoperability through the open archives initiative”, New Review of Information Networking, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133-145, 2001.
[19] OAI, The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[20] X. Bullón, “La visibilidad y los recursos educativos. Técnicas de recolección de metadatos mediante OAI-PMH y LOM”, Idea La Mancha: Revista de Educación de Castilla-La Mancha. Toledo, no. 5, pp. 106-113, 2007.
[21] M. Lytras and M. Sicilia, “Where is the value in metadata?”, International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 235-241, 2007.
[22] S. Sánchez and M. Sicilia, “Relationships and commitments in learning object metadata”, Proc. ITHET 2004 - 5th Int. Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training. IEEE, 2004.
[23] D. Gašević, D. Djurić, and V. Devedzic, Model driven engineering and ontology development. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2009.
[24] J. Gero, “Design prototypes. A knowledge representation schema for design”, AI Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 26, 1990.
[25] M. Genesereth and S. Ketchpel, “Software agents”, Commun. ACM, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 48-53, 1994.
[26] N. R. Jennings, “On agent-based software engineering”, Artificial Intelligence, vo. 117, no. 2, pp. 277-296, 2000.
[27] S. Franklin and A. Graesser, “Is it an Agent, or just a Program? A taxonomy for autonomous agents”, in Intelligent Agents III Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. Berlin: Springer, 1997, pp. 21-35.
[28] H. Kreger, “Fulfilling the Web services promise”, Commun. ACM, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 29-ff, 2003. doi: 10.1145/777313.777334
[29] M. Champion, C. Ferris, E. Newcomer, and D. Orchard, Web services architecture, working draft, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. Accessed Jan 17, 2015.
[30] IMS, IMS Global Learning Consortium Inc. Overview of Specifications, disposable in, 2013 [online].Available: http://www.imsglobal.org/overview.cfm. Accessed Jan 17, 2015.
[31] J. Golbeck, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler, Trust networks on the semantic web. Berlin: Springer, 2003.
[32] M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos, “Trust management for the semantic web”, in The Semantic Web-ISWC 2003. Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp. 351-368.
[33] P. Gaona-García, J. Soto, and C. Montenegro, “Trust levels definition on virtual learning platforms through semantic languages”, International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010.
[34] O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, and A. López-Cima, “Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE”, in Law and the Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2005, pp. 142-157.
[35] M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, and N. Juristo, Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering, 1997 [online]. Available: http://aaaipress.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1997/SS-97-06/SS97-06-005.pdf
[36] M. Fernández-López and O. Corcho, Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
[37] P. Gaona-García, D. Martín, A. Fermoso, and S. Sánchez, “A usability study of taxonomyvisualization user interfaces in digital repositories”, Journal Online Information Review, vol. 38, no. 2, 2014.
[38] G. Tsakonas and C. Papatheodorou, “Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries”, Information Processing & Management, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1234-1250, 2008.
[39] J. Park, “Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art”, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 213-228, 2009.
[40] J.Y.L. Thong, W. Hong, and K.-Y. Tam, “Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 215-242, 2002.
[41] P. Gaona-García, S. Sánchez-Alonso, et al., “Visualization of information. A proposal to improve the search and access to digital resources in repositories”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 83-89, 2014.
[42] D. Martin-Moncunill, S. Sánchez Alonso, P. Gaona-García, N. Marianos, “Applying visualization techniques to develop interfaces for educational repositories. The case of Organic. Lingua and VOA3R”, 2013 [online]. Available: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236877824_Applying_visualization_techniques_to_develop_interfaces_for_educational_repositories_the_case_of_Organic.Lingua_and_VOA3R
[43] C. E. Montenegro Marín, P.A. Gaona-García, E. E. Gaona García,., “Plataforma de seguridad basado en autenticidad de contenidos sobre conjunto de especificaciones SCORM”. Revista Ingeniería y Competitividad, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 51-68, 2011.
[44] G. Draper, Y. Livnat, and R. Riesenfeld, “A survey of radial methods for information visualization”, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 759-776, 2009. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2009.23
[45] M. Gleicher, D. Albers, R. Walker, I. Jusufi, C. D. Hansen, and. J. Roberts, “Visual comparison for information visualization”, Information Visualization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 289-309, 2011.
[46] M. Graham and J. Kennedy, “A survey of multiple tree visualization”, Information Visualization, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 235-252, 2010.
[47] I. Herman, G. Melancon, and M. S. Marshall, “Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization. A survey”, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-43, 2000. doi: 10.1109/2945.841119
[2] S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. Ives, “Dbpedia. A nucleus for a web of open data”, in The semantic web, Philadelphia: Springer, 2007, pp. 722-735.
[3] Open Discovery Space (ODS), Open Discovery Space, 2015 [online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/apps/projects/factsheet/index.cfm?project_ref=297229.Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[4] M. Fakhimi, L. Stergioulas, et al. “Methodology and evaluation framework for measuring impact of and e-learning platform”, EDULEARN14 Proceedings: 2150-2155, 2014.
[5] Europeana, Europeana professional, 2015 [online]. Available: http://pro.europeana.eu. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[6] B. Haslhofer and A. Isaac, “data.European.eu: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot”, in Proc. Of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Sep 21-23, 2011, The Hague, Netherlands, 2011.
[7] A. Miles, B. Matthews, M. Wilson, and D. Brickley, “SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web” in Proc. at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications “Metadata Vocabularies in Practice”, Sep. 12-15, 2005, Leganés, Madrid, Spain.
[8] J. Lacasta, J. Nogueras-Iso, et al., “ThManager. An open source tool for creating and visualizing SKOS”. Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 39-51, 2013.
[9] M. Hearst, Search user interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[10] M. Khoo, D. Kusunoki, and C. MacDonald, “Finding Problems. When Digital Library Users Act as Usability Evaluators”, in Proc. at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, Jan 4-7, 2012.
[11] H. Kim and Y. Kim, “Usability study of digital institutional repositories”, Electronic Library, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 863-881, 2008.
[12] LOM, “LOM Standard. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata”, in IEEE P1484.12/D4.0, 2003 [online]. Available: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/20020612-Final-LOM-Draft.html. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[13] SCORM, SCORM, Sharable Content Object Reference Model, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.adlnet.org/. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[14] C. Cechinel, S. Sánchez, and M. Sicilia, “Empirical analysis of errors on human-generated learning objects metadata”, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 46, pp. 60-70, 2009.
[15] J. Fernández, “Modelos de recuperación de información basados en redes de creencia”, tesis doctoral, Universidad de Granada, España, 2001.
[16] J. Pastor, “Diseño de un sistema colaborativo para la creación y gestión de tesauros en Internet basado en SKOS” PhD thesis, 2009.
[17] F. O. Bello-Pérez y J. N. Pérez-Castillo, “Interoperabilidad entre los dominios de la arquitectura, la ingeniería y la construcción y los sistemas de información geográfica1”, Ingeniería y Universidad, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 183-200, 2012.
[18] M. L. Nelson, “Better interoperability through the open archives initiative”, New Review of Information Networking, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133-145, 2001.
[19] OAI, The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm. Accessed Jan. 17, 2015.
[20] X. Bullón, “La visibilidad y los recursos educativos. Técnicas de recolección de metadatos mediante OAI-PMH y LOM”, Idea La Mancha: Revista de Educación de Castilla-La Mancha. Toledo, no. 5, pp. 106-113, 2007.
[21] M. Lytras and M. Sicilia, “Where is the value in metadata?”, International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 235-241, 2007.
[22] S. Sánchez and M. Sicilia, “Relationships and commitments in learning object metadata”, Proc. ITHET 2004 - 5th Int. Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training. IEEE, 2004.
[23] D. Gašević, D. Djurić, and V. Devedzic, Model driven engineering and ontology development. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2009.
[24] J. Gero, “Design prototypes. A knowledge representation schema for design”, AI Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 26, 1990.
[25] M. Genesereth and S. Ketchpel, “Software agents”, Commun. ACM, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 48-53, 1994.
[26] N. R. Jennings, “On agent-based software engineering”, Artificial Intelligence, vo. 117, no. 2, pp. 277-296, 2000.
[27] S. Franklin and A. Graesser, “Is it an Agent, or just a Program? A taxonomy for autonomous agents”, in Intelligent Agents III Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. Berlin: Springer, 1997, pp. 21-35.
[28] H. Kreger, “Fulfilling the Web services promise”, Commun. ACM, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 29-ff, 2003. doi: 10.1145/777313.777334
[29] M. Champion, C. Ferris, E. Newcomer, and D. Orchard, Web services architecture, working draft, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. Accessed Jan 17, 2015.
[30] IMS, IMS Global Learning Consortium Inc. Overview of Specifications, disposable in, 2013 [online].Available: http://www.imsglobal.org/overview.cfm. Accessed Jan 17, 2015.
[31] J. Golbeck, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler, Trust networks on the semantic web. Berlin: Springer, 2003.
[32] M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos, “Trust management for the semantic web”, in The Semantic Web-ISWC 2003. Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp. 351-368.
[33] P. Gaona-García, J. Soto, and C. Montenegro, “Trust levels definition on virtual learning platforms through semantic languages”, International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010.
[34] O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, and A. López-Cima, “Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE”, in Law and the Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2005, pp. 142-157.
[35] M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, and N. Juristo, Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering, 1997 [online]. Available: http://aaaipress.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1997/SS-97-06/SS97-06-005.pdf
[36] M. Fernández-López and O. Corcho, Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
[37] P. Gaona-García, D. Martín, A. Fermoso, and S. Sánchez, “A usability study of taxonomyvisualization user interfaces in digital repositories”, Journal Online Information Review, vol. 38, no. 2, 2014.
[38] G. Tsakonas and C. Papatheodorou, “Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries”, Information Processing & Management, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1234-1250, 2008.
[39] J. Park, “Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art”, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 213-228, 2009.
[40] J.Y.L. Thong, W. Hong, and K.-Y. Tam, “Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 215-242, 2002.
[41] P. Gaona-García, S. Sánchez-Alonso, et al., “Visualization of information. A proposal to improve the search and access to digital resources in repositories”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 83-89, 2014.
[42] D. Martin-Moncunill, S. Sánchez Alonso, P. Gaona-García, N. Marianos, “Applying visualization techniques to develop interfaces for educational repositories. The case of Organic. Lingua and VOA3R”, 2013 [online]. Available: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236877824_Applying_visualization_techniques_to_develop_interfaces_for_educational_repositories_the_case_of_Organic.Lingua_and_VOA3R
[43] C. E. Montenegro Marín, P.A. Gaona-García, E. E. Gaona García,., “Plataforma de seguridad basado en autenticidad de contenidos sobre conjunto de especificaciones SCORM”. Revista Ingeniería y Competitividad, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 51-68, 2011.
[44] G. Draper, Y. Livnat, and R. Riesenfeld, “A survey of radial methods for information visualization”, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 759-776, 2009. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2009.23
[45] M. Gleicher, D. Albers, R. Walker, I. Jusufi, C. D. Hansen, and. J. Roberts, “Visual comparison for information visualization”, Information Visualization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 289-309, 2011.
[46] M. Graham and J. Kennedy, “A survey of multiple tree visualization”, Information Visualization, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 235-252, 2010.
[47] I. Herman, G. Melancon, and M. S. Marshall, “Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization. A survey”, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-43, 2000. doi: 10.1109/2945.841119
Una vez aceptado un trabajo para publicación la revista podrá disponer de él en toda su extensión, tanto directamente como a través de intermediarios, ya sea de forma impresa o electrónica, para su publicación ya sea en medio impreso o en medio electrónico, en formatos electrónicos de almacenamiento, en sitios de la Internet propios o de cualquier otro editor. Este uso tiene como fin divulgar el trabajo en la comunidad científica y académica nacional e internacional y no persigue fines de lucro. Para ello el autor o los autores le otorgan el permiso correspondiente a la revista para dicha divulgación mediante autorización escrita.
Todos los articulos aceptados para publicación son sometidos a corrección de estilo. Por tanto el autor /los autores autorizan desde ya los cambios sufridos por el artículo en la corrección de estilo.
El autor o los autores conservarán los derechos morales y patrimoniales del artículo.