Palabras clave
redes sociales
persuasión
influencia social
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo es el resultado de un estudio bibliométrico que tuvo como fin analizar las publicaciones sobre investigación en el campo de los derechos humanos en las redes sociales, enfatizando la búsqueda de estudios sobre persuasión e influencia social en comunidades virtuales. En el análisis se identificaron los autores y países más productivos, co-ocurrencias de palabras clave, cooperación entre autores y co-citas, así como la evolución temática de la investigación en estas áreas. La búsqueda se realizó en Scopus, esta arrojó 325 artículos, de los cuales el 48.31% fueron publicados entre los años 2015 y 2020. Se registran 679 autores ocasionales con un artículo unido a una dispersión de 287 publicaciones. Se encuentran cinco estudios relativos a los derechos humanos en Colombia asociados con víctimas del conflicto, medios de comunicación y el fenómeno de trata de blancas, la función administrativa en la era de las TIC, el derecho a la salud de pacientes con enfermedades mentales y el litigio estratégico para promover los derechos. No se observan publicaciones sobre promoción o protección de derechos humanos a través de las redes sociales, más allá de la denuncia de su violación en comunidades vulnerables concentrados en aspectos de salud.
Alexander, M., Garda, L., Kanade, S., Jejeebhoy, S., & Ganatra, B. (2006). Romance and Sex: Pre-Marital Partnership Formation among Young Women and Men, Pune District, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 14(28), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(06)28265-X
Alhelbawy, A., Lattimer, M., Kruschwitz, U., Fox, C., & Poesio, M. (2020). An NLP-Powered Human Rights Monitoring Platform. Expert Systems with Applications, 153, 113365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113365
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007.
Ayala, T. (2014). Redes sociales, poder y participación ciudadana. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 26, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2014.n26-02
Barón, L. F. (2015). ¿Revolución de Facebook? Medios sociales y movimientos sociales durante la Primavera Árabe de Egipto. Trans-pasando Fronteras, 18(7), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i7.2098
Barroso, C. (1989). On research concerning abortion in Latin America and studies on women [As pesquisas sobre o aborto na America Latina e os estudos de mulher.]. Revista brasileira de estudos de populacao, 6(1), 35-60. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0024481253&partnerID=40&md5=fb55efd4336facdfc29b20bf864aae6f
Belotti, F., Comunello, F., & Corradi, C. (2020). Feminicidio and #NiUnaMenos: An Analysis of Twitter Conversations During the First 3 Years of the Argentinean Movement. Violence Against Women 27(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220921947
Callahan, S. (1988). Persuasion and change. Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo) 69(9), 57-59. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0024119110&partnerID=40&md5=894dd32e0cd7116e9e039c8234a9c390
Charnysh, V., Lloyd, P., & Simmons, B.A. (2015). Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 323-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114530173
Chen, F., & Neill, D.B. (2015). Human Rights Event Detection from Heterogeneous Social Media Graphs. Big Data 3(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2014.0072
Cleveland, S., & Dawson, M. (2016). Microblogging in higher education: Digital Natives, knowledge creation, social engineering, and intelligence analysis of educational tweets. E-learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672130
Dangur, I., Bekkerman, R., & Minkov, E. (2020). Identification of topical subpopulations on social media. Information Sciences, 528, 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.04.005
De Gagne, D. (1994). People living with HIV / AIDS: promoting health through partnership. AIDS health promotion exchange / World Health Organization, Global Programme on AIDS, Health Promotion Unit, 3, 1-3. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0028680152&partnerID=40&md5=564f7e525be16dec32b52207835ab4d3
Evans, H. I., Wong-Villacres, M., Castro, D., Gilbert, E., Arriaga, R.I., Dye, M., & Bruckman, A. (2018). Facebook in Venezuela: Understanding Solidarity economies in low-trust environments. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, 228, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173802
Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2004). How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal, 54, 621-703. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol54/iss3/1
Hankey, S., & ´O Clunaigh, D. (2013). Rethinking Risk and Security of Human Rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 5(3), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hut023
Hutchinson, K., Roberts, C., Daly, M., Bulsara, C., & Kurrle, S. (2016). Empowerment of young people who have a parent living with dementia: A social model perspective. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(4), 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215001714
Iskhakova, N.H., Chuprii, L. V., Lyasota, L.I., Bondar, L. V., & Lytvynchuk, N.B. (2020). Innovative approaches of political education in Ukraine: On the example of developed western democracies. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0030
Jones, S.K. (2016). Identifying Facebook-, Twitter-, And Instagram-Specific Rhetoric Identifying Facebook-, Twitter-, And Instagram-Specific Rhetoric And Interaction: A Case Study (Publicación No. 1150) [Tesis de maestría, Universidad del Estado de Missouri]. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theseshttps://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1150.
Keck, M.E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=y-YH95YHIiwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Activists+beyond+borders:+Advocacy+Networks+in+International+Politics&ots=RtLU887TYp&sig=CCNvQR6__kKKsWsAml0T7yVsjNc#v=onepage&q=Activists beyond borders%3A Advocacy Networks in
Kushwaha, S., Lalani, Y., Maina, G., Ogunbajo, A., Wilton, L., Agyarko-Poku, T., Adu-Sarkodie, Y., Boakye, F., Zhang, N., & Nelson, L.E. (2017). “but the moment they find out that you are MSM ⋯”: a qualitative investigation of HIV prevention experiences among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana’s health care system. Public Health, 17(1), 770. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4799-1
Linos, K., & Pegram, T. (2017). What Works in Human Rights Institutions? American Journal of International Law, 111(3), 628–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.65
Liu, J.H., Gil De Zúñiga, H., & Diehl, T. (2019). Social Cognition and Communication: From Attitudes and Persuasion to Cross-Cultural Psychology, Social Representations, Discourse, and the Technologies of Digital Influence. En K. C., O’Doherty & D., Hodgetts. (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Psychology (pp. 382–399). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lukose, L., & Mathur, A. (2019). Human Right and Social Media. Elcop Yearbook of Human Rights, no. March, pp. 31-38. https://www.rienner.com/
Mcdougal, L., Jackson, E.C., Mcclendon, K.A., Belayneh, Y., Sinha, A., & Raj, A. (2018). Beyond the statistic: Exploring the process of early marriage decision-making using qualitative findings from Ethiopia and India. BMC Women’s Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0631-z
Meriläinen, N., &Vos, M. (2011). Human rights organizations and online agenda setting. Corporate Communications, 16(4), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111186940
Oyanedel S., J.C., & Ortúzar F., H., 2018. Systematization of the pilot implementation of a gesell dome in a family court [Sistematización de una experiencia piloto de implementación de una sala gesell para la entrevista de niños en un tribunal de familia]. Revista Chilena de Pediatria, 89(6), 694-700. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062018005000813
Pham, M.T. (2013). The seven sins of consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.004
Rhodes, T., Singer, M., Bourgois, P., Friedman, S.R. y Strathdee, S.A., 2005. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science and Medicine, 61(5), 1026-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024
Rodriguez, N. S. (2016). Communicating global inequalities: How LGBTI asylum-specific NGOs use social media as public relations. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.12.002
Sánchez-Alzate, J. A. & Sánchez-Torres, J. A. (2017). Analysis of social factors and their relationship with perceived risk for e-commerce purchases. DYNA, 84(200), 335-341. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v84n200.54161
Saleem, H.T., Narasimhan, M., Denison, J.A., & Kennedy, C.E. (2017). Achieving pregnancy safely for HIV-serodiscordant couples: A social ecological approach. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 20(S1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.2.21331
Salimi, D., Tavasoli, K., Gilani, E., Jouyandeh, M., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2019). The impact of social media on marketing using bibliometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.006
Sarikakis, K., & Rodriguez-Amat, J.R. (2012). Human Rights Online or on the line? The Role of New (social) Media in Human Rights Protection. http://mediagovernance.univie.ac.at/publications/
Simmons, R., Mita, R., & Koenig, M.A. (1992). Employment in family planning and women's status in Bangladesh. Studies in family planning, 23(2), 97-108 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1604463/
Siqueira Wiarda, I. (1980). Women’s involvement in population and development policies. Draper Fund report, 9, 8-10. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0019067424&partnerID=40&md5=428cd267498cbaebb3d3a2edaf197e76.
Slattery, P., Vidgen, R., & Finnegan, P. (2020). Persuasion: An Analysis and Common Frame of Reference for IS Research. BIROn-Birkbeck Institutional Research Online, 34, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04603
Udanor, C., Aneke, S., & Ogbuokiri, B.O. (2016). Determining social media impact on the politics of developing countries using social network analytics. Program, 50(4), 481-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-02-2016-0011
Wolfson, M. (1986). The politics of population. Harvard international review, 8(4), 4-8. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0022672495&partnerID=40&md5=c49a0cebc0232f8b04bd6853c4b850bb
Yuce, S.T., Agarwal, N., & Wigand, R.T., (2015). Social media, digital activism, and online collective action: A tale of two overlapping women’s rights movements. Americas Conference on Information Systems. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84963626872&partnerID=40&md5=bbd43195b49e7790f46c1949654efd92.
Zanatta, F., Martínez Sainz, G., & Gillett-Swan, J. (2019). A Critical Realist Reflection on the Use of Social Media as Third Space for Rights Education in Early Childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51, 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-019-00249-0.
Zommers, Z., & Macdonald, D.W. (2012). Protected Areas as Frontiers for Human Migration. Conservation Biology, 26(3), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01846.x
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Luis Tejada-Orozco, Marithza Sandoval-Escobar, Silvana Dakduk