Keywords
psychometric properties
mental health literacy
young people
How to Cite
Abstract
Several instruments assess constructs related to mental health literacy and to the stigma associated with mental health problems. However, most of them have conceptualisations that may limit the assessment of the mental health literacy concept in a more up-to-date and comprehensive perspective. Furthermore, some of the instruments’ structure may limit their use in large scale samples, in a short period of time and with repeated measures. This article presents the development of the Mental Health Literacy questionnaire (MHLq) and the studies to assess its psychometric properties. After item-pool generation, content validity was assessed by experts and a think aloud procedure. The MHLq was tested in two samples of students (study 1 n=239; aged between 12 and 15 years old; study 2 n=737; aged between 11 and 17 years old) to determine its psychometric properties. Factor analysis procedures favoured a three-factor solution (with 33 items) of the MHLq. The questionnaire showed good internal consistency (total score α=0.84; Factor 1 first aid skills and help seeking - α=0.79; Factor 2 knowledge/stereotypes - α=0.78; Factor 3 self-help strategies - α=0.72); and excellent test-retest reliability, the ICC for the total score of MHLq was 0.88 and for the three dimensions of MHLq was 0.80 (Factor 1), 0.90 (Factor 2) and 0.86 (Factor 3). The MHLq is a practical, valid and reliable tool for identifying gaps in knowledge, beliefs and behavioural intentions, in large samples, allowing the development and evaluation of interventions aimed at promoting mental health in young people.
Angermeyer, M., Matschinger, H., & Corrigan, P. (2004). Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: testing a model using data from a representative population survey. Schizophrenia Research, 69, 175– 182.
Bourget Management Consulting for the Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health. (2007). Mental Health Literacy: A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from www.camimh.ca/files/ literacy/LIT_REVIEW_MAY_6_07.pdf
Burns, J., & Rapee, R. (2006). Adolescent mental health literacy: Young people’s knowledge of depression and help seeking. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 225– 239.
Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health. (2007). Mental Health Literacy in Canada: Phase One Project Mental Health Literacy Project. Retrieved from http://www.camimh.ca/files/literacy/MHL_REPORT_Phase_One.pdf
Corrigan, P. (2000). Mental health stigma as social attribution: implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 7(1), 48-67.
Corrigan, P., Green, A., Lundin, R., Kubiak, M., & Penn, D. (2001). Familiarity with and social distance from people who have serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 953–958.
Cotton, S., Wright, A., Harris, M., Jorm, A., & McGorry, P. (2006). Influence of gender on mental health literacy in young Australians. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 790–796.
Farrer, L., Leach, L., Griffiths, K., Christensen, H., & Jorm, A. (2008). Age differences in Mental Health Literacy. BMC Public Health, 8(125), 1-8.
Freire, T. & Almeida, L. (2001). Escalas de Avaliação: Construção e validação. In: Fernandes E and Almeida L (eds) Métodos e Técnicas de Avaliação: contributos para a prática e investigação psicológicas (pp.109-128). Braga: Universidade do Minho, Centro de Estudos em Educação e Psicologia.
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K., & Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 10(113) 1-9.
Hinkin, T. (1998). A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
Janda, L.H. (1998). Psychological testing: theory and applications. Massachusetts: Ally & Bacon.
Jorm, A. (2000). Mental health literacy: public knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 396-401.
Jorm. A. (2012). Mental health literacy: empowering the community to take action for action for better mental health. American Psychologist, 67(3), 231-243.
Jorm, A., Korten, A., Jacomb, P., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., & Pollit, P. (1997). Mental health literacy”: a survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Medical Journal of Australia, 166(4), 182-186.
Jorm, A., Wright, A., & Morgan, A. (2007). Beliefs about appropriate first aid for young people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian national survey of youth and parents. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 1, 61–70.
Kelly, C., Jorm, A., & Wright, A. (2007). Improving mental health literacy as a strategy to facilitate early intervention for mental disorders. Medical Journal of Australia, 187(7), S26-S30.
Kitchener, B., & Jorm, A. (2004). Mental health first aid training in a workplace setting: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 4(23 ) 1-8.
Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Lauber, C., Nordt, C., Falcato, L., & Rössler, W. (2001). Lay recommendations on how to treat mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36, 553–556.
Li, H. (2012). Mental health literacy, stigma, and early intervention. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 209-210.
Link, B., Yang, L., Phelan, J., & Collins, P. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511-541.
Loureiro, L. (2012). Questionário de Avaliação da Literacia em Saúde Mental – QuALiSMental: estudo das propriedades psicométricas. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4(4), 79-88.
Luty, J., Fekadu, D., Umoh, O., & Gallagher, J. (2006). Validation of a short instrument to measure stigmatized attitudes towards mental illness. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 257-260.
Marx, R.G., Menezes, A., Horovitz, L., Jones, E., & Russel, W. (2003). A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 730-735.
Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rosner, B. (1995). Fundamentals of biostatistics. Toronto: Duxbury Press.
Schulze, B., Richter-Werling, M., Matschinger, H. & Angermeyer, M.C. (2003). Crazy? So what! Effects of a school project on students’ attitudes towards people with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107, 142–150.
Scottish Executive & Healthy Living. (2003). National Programme for Improving Mental Health and WellBeing: Action plan 2003-2006. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Van Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F. & Sandberg, J.C. (1994). The think aloud method. A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
Wei, Y., Hayden, J., Kutcher, S., Zygmunt, A., & McGrath, P. (2013). The effectiveness of school mental health literacy programs to address knowledge, attitudes and help seeking among youth. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 7, 109-121.
Williams, B., & Pow, J. (2007). Gender Differences and Mental Health: An Exploratory Study of Knowledge and Attitudes to Mental Health Among Scottish Teenagers. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(1), 8–12.
World Health Organization. (2005) Atlas: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Resources: Global Concerns, Implications for the Future. Report, Geneva.
Wyn, J., Cahill, H., Holdsworth, R., Rowling, L., & Carson, S. (2000). MindMatters, a whole-school approach promoting mental health and wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 594–601.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.