Abstract
Across two studies we aimed to provide evidences of validity and reliability for the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) in Brazil. In study 1, 171 individuals participated (Age M=21.9, SD=6.59) and 232 in Study 2 (Age M=26.3, SD=7.06). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the predicted one-factor solution, with five items and satisfactory internal consistence (α=.76). A multi-group CFA revealed partial measurement equivalence between our and the original (USA) versions of the BRS. The BRS correlated significant with positivity and personality traits. The composite reliability was satisfying; the convergent validity, measured with the average variance extracted, was slightly below the recommendations. Overall, the results show that the measure is psychometrically suitable for research in Brazil.
Aamaas, A., Keenan, W. J. F., Sedmak, C., & Zijden, L. van der. (2011). Resilience and Unemployment: An Introduction. In A. Aamaas, W. J. F. Keenan, C. Sedmak, & L. van der Zijden (Eds.), Resilience and Unemployment (Vol. 4, pp. 7–17). Wien: Lit Verlag.
Ahern, N. R., Kiehl, E. M., Sole, M. L., & Byers, J. (2006). A review of instruments measuring resilience. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 29(2), 103–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01460860600677643
Andrade, J. M. (2008). Evidências de validade do Inventário dos Cinco Grandes Fatores de Personalidade para o Brasil. Ph.D. thesis. Psychology Department, Brasília University, DF - Brazil. American Psychological Association. (2015). The road to resilience. Author. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx
Author (2013). Details omitted for blind reviewing.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(4), 585–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001
Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Steca, P., Yamaguchi, S., Fukuzawa, A., Eisenberg, N.,... & Abela, J. (2012). The Positivity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24, 701-712.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO FiveFactor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement Equivalence
in Cross-National Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New
Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings.
Social Indicators Research, 143–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R.E. (2015). Multivariate Data Analysis (7 edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory & Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, University of California: Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Fonseca, P. N., Nascimento, B. S., Barbosa, L. H. G. M., Vione, K. C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Flourishing Scale: Evidence of Its Suitability to the Brazilian Context. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 1(2), 33–40.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O. (2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 14(1), 29–42.
Gouveia, V. V. (2013). Teoria funcionalista dos valores humanos: Fundamentos, aplicações e perspectivas. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge.
Lang, D. (2010a). Defining “resilience”. A working paper. Retrieved from http://www.ifz-salzburg.at/uploads/resilience.pdf
Lang, D. (2010b). The concept of resilience as a source of insight for decent work and decent unemployment. In C. Bagusat, W. J. F. Keenan, & C. Sedmak (Eds.), Decent work and unemployment (Vol. 3). Wien: Lit.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist,
(3), 227–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in
cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–121.
Raîche, G., Walls, T. A., Magis, D., Riopel, M., & Blais, J. G. (2013). Non-Graphical Solutions for Cattell’s Scree Test. Methodology, 9(1), 23–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000051
R Development Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/fullrefman.pdf
Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020
Riolli, L., Savicki, V., & Cepani, A. (2002). Resilience in the face of catastrophe: Optimism, personality and coping in the Kosovo crisis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(8), 1604–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299
Shi, M., Liu, L., Wang, Z. Y., & Wang, L. (2015). The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship
between Big Five Personality and Anxiety among Chinese Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional
Study. PloS One, 10(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119916
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
Souza, R. V. L. de, Araújo, R. de C. R., Gouveia, R. S. V., Coelho, G. L. de H., & Gouveia, V. V. (2014). The Positivity Dimension of Well-Being: Adaptation and Psychometric Evidence of a Measure. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24(59), 305–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272459201404
Škerlavaj, M., & Dimovski, V. (2009). Organizational Learning and Performance in Two National Cultures: A Multi-group Structural Equation Modeling Approach. In W. R. King (Ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning (pp. 321–367). Springer US. Retrieved from http://link.springer. com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_19
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6 edition). Pearson.
Tusaie, K., & Dyer, J. (2004). Resilience: a historical review of the construct. Holistic Nursing Practice, 18(1), 3–8; quiz 9–10.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance
literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/109442810031002
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (2001). Journeys from Childhood to Midlife: Risk, Resilience, and Recovery.Cornell University Press.
Youssef, C., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace: The Impact of Hope, Optimism, and Resilience. Management Department Faculty Publications. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/36
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.