Blame attribution among people with developmental disability
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Moral Judgments
Autism
Down Syndrome
Offender

How to Cite

Blame attribution among people with developmental disability. (2016). Universitas Psychologica, 15(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.baap
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

We synthesize the main findings from two studies that examined moral judgement abilities in people with autism, and in people with Down syndrome. In both studies, the way these people mentally combine information about the intent of a harmful act and the severity of its consequences when attributing blame to an offender was compared with that of typically developing controls. Adolescents and adults with autism or with Down syndrome were, practically to the same extent as controls, able to take into account both information pieces for attributing blame. It would be an exaggeration to imply that adolescents and adults with either autism or Down syndrome are severely immature in moral judgement based on the fact that they are usually not able to explain or justify their judgements with sophisticated philosophical arguments. By contrast, children with autism blame attribution appeared to be essentially based on consequence information. The finding that adolescents and adults with autism or Down syndrome are able to make moral judgements in a way that is not very different from adolescents and adults of the same age could influence the way these people are perceived, cared for, and attributed basic rights.

PDF
HTML

Anderson, N. H. (2013). Moral science . Retrieved from http://functionalmeasurement.vub.ac.be/publications/Moral_Science.pdf

Blair, R. J. R. (1996). Morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26 , 571-579.

Bonnin-Scaon, S., Lafon, P., Chasseigne, G., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. C. (2002). Learning the relationship between smoking, drinking alcohol, and the risk of esophagal cancer. Health Education Research, 17 , 415-424.

D’Entremont, B., & Yazbeck, A. (2007). Imitation of intentional and accidental actions by children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37 , 1665-1678.

Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Grant, C. M., Boucher, J., Riggs, K. J., & Grayson, A. (2005). Moral understanding in children with autism. Autism, 9 , 317-331.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow . New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, MI: Rand & McNally.

Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2010). Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities. Developmental Review, 30 , 273–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.01.001

Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., Steverson, T., & Palmer, E. J. (2011). Relationships among moral reasoning, empathy, and distorted cognitions in men with intellectual disabilities and a history of criminal offending. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 116 , 438–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-116.6.438

Leon, M. (1980). Integration of intent and consequence information in children’s moral judgments. In F. Wilkening, J. Becker, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Information integration by children (pp. 71–97). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Leon, M. (1982). Rules in children’s moral judgments: Integration of intent, damage, and rationale information. Developmental Psychology, 18 , 835–842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.835

Morales, G. E., Lopez, E. O., Castro, C., Charles, D. J., Mezquita, Y. N., & Mullet, E. (2015). Conceptualization of romantic love among adults with Down’s syndrome. Sexuality and Disability, 33 , 339–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9368-2

Mullet, E. (2011). Functional learning. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the science of learning . New York: Springer.

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child . New York, NY: Free Press.

Rogé, B., & Mullet, E. (2011). Blame and forgiveness judgements among children, adolescents and adults with autism. Autism, 15 , 702–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361310394219

Surber, C. F. (1977). Developmental processes in social inference: Averaging of intentions and consequences in moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 13 , 654–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.13.6.654

Surber, C. F. (1982). Separable effects of motives, consequences, and presentation order on children’s moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 18 , 257–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.2.257

van Vugt, E., Asscher, J., Stams, G. J., Hendriks, J., Stams, G. J. J. M., Bijleveld, C., & van der Laan, P. (2011). Moral judgment of young sex offenders with and without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32 , 2841–2846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.022

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.