Agency and judgment in the study of corruption: A systematic review from psychology<sup> </sup>
PDF
HTML Full Text
XML

Keywords

Moral judgment
Moral agency
Corruption
Moral psychology
Ethical decision making

How to Cite

Sarmiento-López, J. C., Gutierrez-Romero, M. F., & Bernal-Sandoval, F. A. (2025). Agency and judgment in the study of corruption: A systematic review from psychology . Universitas Psychologica, 24. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy24.ajsc
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of the psychological literature on corruption. Models, methodologies, processes, and factors involved in the study and understanding of moral judgment and agency in corruption scenarios were identified. Based on the analysis of 61 studies (2013–2024) using the PRISMA methodology and bibliometric tools, four thematic focuses were identified: bribery in experimental settings, the psychological impact of perceived corruption, individual predictors of corrupt intention, and culture, values, and institutional legitimacy. The findings show that corrupt decisions are not explained by rational calculation. This cognitive phenomenon links the interaction of moral emotions (shame), relational closeness between people, the perception of contextual elements (perceived risk, institutional legitimacy), and cultural and personal beliefs. It is concluded that the psychology of moral development does not present a unified model. This heterogeneity raises the question of integrating cognitive, affective, normative, and interdisciplinary dimensions to explain corruption.

PDF
HTML Full Text
XML

Abraham, J., Kurniadi, M. A., Andangsari, E. W., Ali, M. M., Manurung, R. H., & Warnars, H. L. H. S. (2020). Prediction of guilt and shame proneness based on disruption to psychological contract: A new light for corruption prevention. Heliyon, 6(6), e04275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04275

Abraham, J., Prayoga, T., Murti, K., Azizah, A., Krishti, N. S., Fajrianti, S. P., Octaviana, B. N., Ispurwanto, W., & Manurung, R. H. (2022). How everyday counterfeit behavior that disrupts self authenticity might lead to corruption tendencies. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 637–663. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S351941

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3

Balafoutas, L., Sandakov, F., & Zhuravleva, T. (2021). No Moral Wiggle Room in an Experimental Corruption Game. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 701294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701294

Bauhr, M., & Charron, N. (2020). Do men and women perceive corruption differently? Gender differences in perception of need and greed corruption. Politics and governance, 8(2): 92-102. DOI:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2701

Cai, W., Guan, Y., Chen, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024). Individualistic powerfulness and collectivistic powerlessness corrupts: How power and cultural orientation influence corruption. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12586

Ceschel, F., Hinna, A., & Homberg, F. (2022). Public sector strategies in curbing corruption: A review of the literature. Public Organization Review, 22(3), 571-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00639-4

Dincer, O. & Gillanders, R. (2021). Shelter in place? Depends on the place: Corruption and social distancing in American states. Social Science & Medicine, 269, 113569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113569

Ferrari, L., & Salustri, F. (2020). The relationship between corruption and chronic diseases: Evidence from Europeans aged 50 years and older. International Journal of Public Health, 65(3), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01347-w

Gaygisiz, E., & Lajunen, T. (2022). Cultural valuers, national personality characteristics, and intelligence as correlates of corruption: a national level analysis. Heliyon, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09506

Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026406

Gutiérrez-Romero, M.F., Giraldo-Huertas J.J., Alonso-Díaz, S., Ibarra-Barajas, M., Moreno-Sierra, M., Romero-Mora, S., & Rubiano-Quintero, M.J. (2024). Youth’s tolerance of corruption: exploring the influence of sensitivity to monetary inequity and sociodemographic factors. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 13(2):120-148. DOI: 10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10548

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2022). La mente moral: cómo cinco grupos de intuiciones innatas guían el desarrollo de varias virtudes, e incluso algunos módulos, específicos a la cultura. Revista de humanidades de Valparaíso, 13, 313-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp313-348

Hartshorne, H., & May, M. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. In Studies in deceit. Volume I. The MacMillan Company

Hatibovic, F., Pinto, I., & Páez, D. (2023). Identificación nacional y control de la mediados por clima socioemocional, eficacia colectiva y confianza en estudiantes chilenos: un estudio experimental. Revista de psicologia, 41(1), 549-575. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202301.020

Helwig, C. C. (2022). Culture, civil liberties, and democracy. In M. Killen & J. G. Smethana [Eds.]. Handbook of moral development (pp. 37-53). Third edition. Routledge Taylor & Francis Gorup.

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.

Hu, Y., Hu, C., Derrington, E., Corgnet, B., Qu, C., & Dreher, J-C. (2021). Neural bassis of corruption in power-holder. eLife, 10:e63922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63922

Ibarra-Barajas, M., Moreno-Sierra, M., Romero-Mora, S., Rubiano-Quintero, M.J. & Gutiérrez-Romero, M.F. (2025). Relación entre sesgo intragrupal, aversión a la inequidad y distribución de recursos en adolescentes: implicaciones para la justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 18(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.18103

Julián, M., & Bonavia, T. (2022). Student’s perceptions of university corruption in a panish public university: a path analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:842345. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842345

Kahnemann, D. (2024). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Primera edición de bolsillo. Décima sexta reimpresión. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.

Khadem, S., & Hemayatkhah, M. (2022). The relationship between religiosity and work ethics among employees of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Ethics and Health, 11(2), 45–56. Doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n10p43.

Kohlberg, L. (1976). Etapas morales y moralización: el enfoque del desarrollo cognitivo. En T. Lickona (Ed.) Desarrollo y Comportamiento Moral: Teoría, Investigación y Asuntos Sociales, Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kominis, G. & Dudau, A. (2018). Colletive corruption- how to live with it: towards a theory of post-crisi corruption perpetuation. European management journal, 36, 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.12.001

Ma, J., Guo, B., & Yu, Y. (2022). Perception of Official Corruption, Satisfaction With Government Performance, and Subjective Wellbeing—An Empirical Study From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 748704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.748704

Manara, M.U., Nübold, A., van Gils, S., Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2023) Exploring the path to corruption–An informed grounded theory study on the decision-making process underlying corruption. PLOS ONE 18(9): e0291819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291819

Martin, J. W., Rigoni, D., & Vohs, K. D. (2017). Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7325-7330. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1702119114

Moradi, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Hunter, J. A. (2018). Flourishing and prosocial behaviors: A multilevel investigation of national corruption level as a moderator. PloS ONE 13(7): e0200062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200062

Niu, B., Li, Y., Ding, X., Fan, Z., Zhou, B., & Cheng, X. (2023). Role of Guanxi (interpersonal relationship) in bribe-taking behaviors: evidence from China. Current psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04486-4

Nucci, L., & Ilten-Gee, R. (2021). Moral education for social justice. Teachers College Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Las fronteras de la justicia. España: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A.

Onwujekwe, O., Orjiakor, C., Ogbozor, P., Agu, I., Agwu, P., Wright, T., Balabanova, D., & Kohler, J. (2023). Examining corruption risks in the procurement and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines in select states in Nigeria. Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 16(141). DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00649-7

Othman, A. K., Ishak, N. M., & Ibrahim, F. (2023). Psychological factors of administrative corruption in Malaysia: A qualitative exploration. Counseling: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 23(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.17509/counseling.v23i1.84942

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2022). A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas [The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas]. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 46, e112. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.112

Pereira Rodríguez, G. (2023). Corrupción como patología social: perspectivas para su combate. En D. Gallego Salazar, M. Correa Casanova, J. Montoya Vargas & P. Ayala Enríquez (Coor.). Superar la corrupción. Horizontes éticos y educativos para América Latina (pp. 7-32). Ediciones Uniandes, Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Ediciones Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Podobnik, B., Vukovic, V., & Stanley, H.E. (2015). Does the Wage Gap between Private and Public Sectors Encourage Political Corruption? PLoS ONE. 10(10): e0141211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141211

Posada, R., & Wainryb, C. (2008). Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children's judgments in the context of survival and revenge. Child Development, 79(4), 882-898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01165.x

Ramos, M. R., & Moriconi, M. (2018). Corruption in Latin America: Stereotypes of politicians and their implications for affect and perceived justice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617729884

Rawls, J. (1971/2010). Teoría de la justicia. Segunda edición en español, Séptima reimpresión. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Reyes-Jaquez, B., & Koenig, M. A. (2024). Does governmental corruption aid or hamper early moral development? Insights from the Dominican Republic and United States contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(11), 2810–2821. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001664

Sai, X., & Zhu, L. (2024). The interactive effect between economics uncertainty and life history strategy on corrupt intentions: a life history theory approach. Frontiers in psychology, 15,1361158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361158

Sandel, M. (2020). Filosofía pública. Ensayos sobre moral en política. Primera edición. España: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.

Sandel, M. (2021). Justicia. ¿Hacenos lo que debemos?. Sexta reimpresión. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial

Sarmiento-López, J. C., & Yáñez-Canal, J. (2019). Discusiones políticas y morales referente a la psicología y su aporte a la psicología del desarrollo moral. Revista colombiana de psicología, 28, 165-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n1.70636

Sarmiento-López, J. y Yáñez-Canal, J. (2025). El sujeto desvinculado o el sujeto con identidad: discusiones ético-políticas sobre las minorías nacionales y su incorporación en las constituciones latinoamericanas. Ideas y Valores, 74(187), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v74n187.116883

Schokkaert, E., & Tarroux, B. (2021). Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. GATE WP. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766216

Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.

Smetana, J. G., & Yoo, H. N. (2023). Development and variations in moral and social-conventional judgments: A social domain theory approach. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (3rd ed., pp. 19–36). Routledge.

Takacs, K. & Rašković, M. (2021). Living with corruption in central and eastern Europe: social identity and the role of moral disengagement. Journal of business ethics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04927-9

Tan, X., Lui, L., Huang, Z., Zheng, W., & Liang, Y. (2016). The effects of general system justification on corruption perception and intent. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01107

Transparencia por Colombia (5 de noviembre de 2024). Más de $21 billones de pesos perdidos y 15 millones de personas afectadas por la corrupción en Colombia revela la Radiografía de la Corrupción 2016 - 2022. Transparencia por Colombia. https://transparenciacolombia.org.co/comunicado-radiografia-2016-2022/#_ftn1

Transparency International. (2009). The anti-corruption plain language guide. Recuperado de https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2009_TIPlainLanguageGuide_EN.pdf

Transparency International. (2025). Corruption perception index 2024. Recuperado de https://transparencia.org.es/wp-content/uploads/CPI2024_Report_EN.pdf

Tu, W., Yang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Influence of individual values on attitudes toward corruption: What undermines formal anticorruption effectiveness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12402

Turiel, E. (2022a). The development of moral judgments, emotions, and sentiments. In D. Dukes, A. C. Samson & E. A. Walle [Eds.]. The Oxford handbook of emotional development (pp. 477-490). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198855903.001.0001

Turiel, E. (2022b). Moral judgments and actions: development and processes of coordination. In M. Killen & J. G. Smethana [Eds.]. Handbook of moral development (pp. 3-18). Third edition. Routledge Taylor & Francis Gorup.

Turiel, E. (2024). Looking back and moving forward: historical lessons for current research on moral development. Human development, 68: 103-120. DOI: 10.1159/000539407

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In H.-J. Lenz & R. Decker (Eds.), Advances in data analysis: Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the German Classification Society (pp. 299–306). Heidelberg: Springer.

Vasco, C. E. (2013). Tres estilos de trabajo en las ciencias sociales. Comentarios a propósito del artículo Conocimiento de Interés de Jürgen Habermas. Cinep.

Walzer, M. (1993). Las esferas de la justicia. 1ra edición. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Witvliet, M. I., Kunst, A. E., Arah, O. A., & Stronks, K. (2013). Sick regimes and sick people: a multilevel investigation of the population health consequences of percieved national corruption. Tropical medicine and international health, 18 (10), 1240-1247. Doi:10.1111/tmi.12177

Yáñez Canal, J. (2019). Lawrence Kohlberg y la psicología moral: trayectoria y variaciones conceptuales. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 12(3), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.12304

Yáñez-Canal, J., Billmann-Mahecha, E., Perdomo, A., & Mojica, A. (2017). Razonamiento socio-moral en los niños con respecto a las relaciones Inclusión-Exclusión. En J. Yáñez-Canal, L. M. Segovia-Nieto & J. A. Chaparro-Parra. [Eds.]. Desarrollo moral y emociones. Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios.

Zandi, S., Esmaeili, M., & Farahbakhsh, K. (2024). Individual and contextual factors associated with the prevention of corruption: A qualitative study among Iranian public employees. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, Article ID 9971954. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9971954

Zhang, Y. (2022). The Relationship Between Corruption Perception and Depression: A Multiple Mediation Model. Psychology research and behavior management, 15, 1943–1954. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S370045

Zhang, D., Zhang, S., Lei, Z., Li, Y., Li, X., & Gu, R. (2023). Why people engage in corrupt collaboration: an observation at the multi-brain level. Cerebral Cortex, 33, 84665-8476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad132

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Julián Camilo Sarmiento-López, Mario Fernando Gutierrez-Romero, Felipe Andrés Bernal-Sandoval