Keywords
PISA
dynamic assessment
Secondary Education
How to Cite
Abstract
A new method to evaluate students’ reading literacy, the Method of Dynamic Assessment for Secondary Education (EdilLEC) is presented. EdilLEC is based on PISA assessment framework and the principles of dynamic assessment. In a computer-based environment, automatically provides adaptive intervention elements (feedback and user’s aids), in order to add to the reading literacy traditional assessment the possibility to explore the potential of student’s learning. The method has been standarized with a sample of 1008 students between 11 and 14 years of aged. Conclusions: The results show satisfactory psychometric properties of reliability, validity and homogeneity.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
Cerdán, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Gilabert, R., & Gil, L. (2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 13-27.
Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Cuñat, M. L. (2010). “Please, read what the question is asking for you”. How textual aids may increase awareness of question demands. 4th Biennial Meeting of the EARLI SIG-16 on Metacognition. Muenster, Alemania.
Cerdán, R., Llorens A. C., Ávila, V., Gilabert, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2011). Using textual aids to foster the comprehension of task demands in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Poster presented at the 21th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse. Poitiers, France.
Corbetty, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of ACMCHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 245-252). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Gil, L., Serrano, M. A., Martínez, T., & Llorens, A. C. (2012). La evaluación on-line de la competencia lectora. Quaderns digitals (71) 1-15. Recuperado de http://www.quadernsdigitals.net/index. php?accionMenu=hemeroteca.VisualizaArticuloIU.visualiza&articulo_id=11148
Gil, L., Serrano, M. A., Mañá, A., Ferrer, A., & Ávila, V. (2012). Intervención en las dificultades en competencia lectora. Quaderns digitals, (71) 1-17. Recuperado de http://www.quadernsdigitals.net/ index.php?accionMenu=hemeroteca.VisualizaArticuloIU.visualiza&articulo_id=11153
Guthke J., & Stein, H. (1996). Are Learning Tests the Better Version of Intelligence Tests? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 1-13.
Guthke, J., & Beckman, J. F. (2000). Learning Test Concepts and Dynamic Assessment. En A. Kozulin & R. Yaacov (Eds.), Experience of Mediated Learning: An Impact of Feuerstein’s Theory in Education and Psychology. Advances in Learning and Instruction (pp. 175–90). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2004). Shallow Semantic Processing of Text: An individual-Differences Account. Discourse Processes, 37(3), 187-204.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67–72.
Lidz, C. S., & Elliot, J. G. (2000). Advances in cognition and educational practice. En J. Carlson (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications (pp. 323-340). New York: Elsevier.
Llorens, A. C., Gil, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Mañá, A., & Gilabert, R. (2011). Evaluación de la Competencia Lectora: La Prueba de Competencia Lectora para Educación Secundaria (CompLEC). Psicothema, 23(4), 809-818.
Mañá, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., Domínguez, C., Gil, L., & Cerdán, R. (2009). Papel de los procesos metacognitivos en una tarea de pregunta-respuesta con textos escritos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32(4), 553-565.
McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Intelligent tutoring and games (ITaG). In Y. Baek (Ed.), Gaming for Classroom-Based Learning: Digital Role Playing as a Motivator of Study (pp. 44-65). Plainsboro, NJ: IGE Global Press.
Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99–113.
Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research review. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745–783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. En H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Ed.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.
OCDE (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evalución Internacional de los Alumnos OCDE. Informe Español. MEC. Madrid.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Sánchez, E., García, J. R., Castellano, N., De Sixte, R., Bustos, A., & García-Rodicio, H. (2008). Qué, cómo y quién: tres dimensiones para analizar la práctica educativa. Cultura y Educación, 20(1), 95-118.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Utley, C. A., Haywood, H. C. & Masters, J. C. (1992). Policy implications of psychological assessment of minority children. En H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 445–469). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology. 102(4), 817-826.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Martinez, T., Salmerón, L., Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Gil, L., Mañá, A., Lloréns, A., & Ferris, R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behavior research methods, 43(1), 179-132.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931). Il processo cognitivo. [Pensamiento y Lenguaje]. Torino: Boringhieri.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.