Keywords
representation of child-rearing practices
psychosocial risk
mother-child interaction
How to Cite
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of the practices, goals, maternal representation of their action and the child's readability of practices and goals on the mother-child interaction observed during a collaborative task. The participants were 82 dyads at psychosocial risk. The mothers reported their practices and goals in hypothetical situations and the representation of their actions in the interaction. Children reported the readability of mothers’ practices and goals. The regression models showed the negative influence of the coercitive and restrictive practices, the positive influence of the maternal representation of their child-rearing actions and the child’s readability of the practices and goals on the dynamic of the mother-child interaction.
Álvarez, M., Rodrigo, M. J., & Rodríguez, G. (2013). Predictibilidad de los mensajes educativos entre madres e hijos en familias en riesgo psicosocial. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(2), 219-229.
Azar, S. T. (2002). Child abuse. En M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (vol. 4, pp. 361-388). Nueva York: Erlbaum.
Bernier, A., Calkins, S. D., & Bell, M. A. (2016). Longitudinal associations between the quality of mother-infant interactions and brain development across infancy. Child Development, 87(4), 1159-1174. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12518
Bousha, D. M., & Twentyman, C. T. (1984). Mother-child interactional style in abuse, neglect, and control groups: Naturalistic observation in the home. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 106-114.
Barbot, B., Crossman, E., Hunter, S. R., Grigorenko, E. L., & Luthar, S. S. (2014). Reciprocal influences between maternal parenting and child adjustment in a high-risk population: A 5-year cross-lagged analysis of bidirectional effects. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(5), 567-580.
Bugental, D. B., & Grusec, J. (2006). Socialization processes. En W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds. de la serie) & N. Eisenberg (Ed. del volumen), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (6a. ed., pp. 366-428). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S.L. (2015). A multilevel perspective on child maltreatment. En M. Lamb & C. Garcia (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 3. Socioemotional process (pp. 513-563). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179-93.
Crittenden, P. M. (1981). Abusing, neglecting, problematic, and adequate dyads: Differentiating by patterns of interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 27, 1-18.
Egeland, B., Pianta, R., & O'Brien, M. A. (1993). Maternal intrusiveness in infancy and child maladaptation in early school years. Development and Psychopathology, 5(3), 359-370.
Gauvain, M., & Perez, S. M. (2007). The socialization of cognition. En J. Grusec & P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 588-613). Nueva York: Guilford.
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81(3), 687-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.
Grusec, J. E., & Walters, G. C. (1991). Psychological abuse and childrearing belief systems. En R. H. Starr Jr. & D. A. Wolfe (Eds.), The effects of child abuse and neglect: Issues and research (pp. 100-128). Nueva York: Guilford.
Hoffman, M. (1970). Moral development. En P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 261-360). Nueva York: Wiley.
Howes, P. W., Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (2000). Affective, organizational, and relational characteristics of maltreating families: A system's perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 95-110.
Kuczynski, L. (2003). Beyond bidirectionality: Bilateral conceptual frameworks for understanding dynamicsin parent-child relations. En L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 3-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kuczynski, L., & De Mol, J. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. En W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Theory and method (Vol. 1, 7a. ed., pp. 323-368). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006-1017.
Maccoby, E. E. (2003). Dynamic viewpoints on parent-child relations: Their implications for socialization processes. Handbook of Dynamics in Parent-Child Relationships (pp. 439-452). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martínez, I., & García, J. F. (2007). Impact of parenting styles on adolescents' self-esteem and internalization of values in Spain. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 338-348. doi: 10.1017/S113874160000660
Oldershaw, L., Walters, G., & Hall, D. K. (1986). Control strategies and noncompliance in abusive mother-child dyads: An observational study. Child Development, 57, 722-732.
Orozco-Hormaza, M., Sánchez-Ríos, H., & Cerchiaro-Ceballos, E. (2012). Relación entre desarrollo cognitivo y contextos deinteracción familiar de niños que viven en sectores urbanos pobres. UniversitasPsychologica, 11(2), 427-440.
Trickett, P. K., & Kuczynski, L. (1986). Children's misbehaviors and parental discipline strategies in abusive and non-abusive families. Developmental Psychology, 22, 115-123.
Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1988). Influence of adult and peer collaborators on children’s planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 24, 840-848.
Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Rodríguez, B. (2013). Parenting styles and child well-being. En A. Ben-Arieh, I. Frønes, F. Casas & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being (pp. 1313-1319). Holland: Springer.
Rodrigo, M. J., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Ceballos, E. (1999). Do children's perceptions and attributions mediate the effects of mothers' child-rearing actions? Journal of Family Psychology, 13(4), 508-522.
Rodrigo, M. J., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Ceballos, E. (2001). Reasoning and action complexity: Sources and consequences on maternal childrearing behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(1), 50-59. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000069
Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., Martín, J. C., & Byrne, S. (2008). Preservación familiar. Un enfoque positivo para la intervención con familias. Madrid: Pirámide.
Rodriguez, G., Rodrigo, M. J., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Triana, B. (2011). Maternal conceptions of the parenting role and mother-child collaborative behaviors in at-risk context. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(4), 389-402.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship of thinking. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5a. ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1985). A theory of action identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.