Published Oct 31, 2022



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Maria Lorena Cardoso

Carlos Daniel Lugo De Langhe

Norma Griselda Díaz

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Background: The success of a pulpectomy in temporary teeth depends on a precise execution of each one of the steps, such as the chemical-mechanical preparation. The requirement of the latter is to find the root canal’s real length, for which the direct method is the most accurate for in vitro measurements. Purpose: To determine in vitro the concordance of root lengths obtained from primary teeth using the radiographic method and the electronic apical locator (EAL). Methods: The study sample consisted of 40 primary molars extracted at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Universidad Nacional del Nordeste’s Dental School (Argentina), which met the experimental inclusion and exclusion criteria. The root canals were measured directly in vitro, by means of optical microscopy. Those findings were compared with measurements obtained radiographically and with EAL Results: The statistical analysis showed that the EAL coincided with the measurement obtained directly from the tooth in 79% of the cases. On the other hand, the coincidence between direct and radiographic measurements was only 52% (p=0.05). Conclusions: The use of EAL in primary molars can be useful to determine root length, which in turn would lead to better pulpectomy treatments and lower the risk of damage of permanent dental germs.

Keywords

dentistry, electronic apex locator, endodontics, pediatric dentistry, primary teeth, pulpectomy, root lengthdientes primarios, endodoncia, localizador apical electrónico, longitud radicular, odontología, odontología pediátrica, pulpectomíadentes decíduos, endodontia, localizador apical eletrônico, comprimento da raiz, odontologia, odontologia pediátrica, pulpectomia

References
1. Mente J, Seidel J, Buchalla W, Koch MJ. Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Int Endod J. 2002. 35: 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00500.x
2. Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993 Nov-Dec; 15(6): 403-407.
3. Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Jan;95(1):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.99
4. Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005 Sep; 23(3): 124-125. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.16883
5. Bahrololoomi Z, Soleymani AA, Modaresi J, Imanian M, Lotfian M. Accuracy of an Electronic Apex Locator for working length determination in primary anterior teeth. J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Apr; 12(4): 243-248
6. Paludo L, Souza SL, Só MV, Rosa RA, Vier-Pelisser FV, Duarte MA. An in vivo radiographic evaluation of the accuracy of Apex and iPex electronic Apex locators. Braz Dent J. 2012; 23(1): 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402012000100010
7. Siu C, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2009 Jul; 35(7): 962-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.025
8. Abanto J, Redua PCB, Bonecker M. Paso a paso para conductas clínicas en odontopediatria. Sao Paulo: Santos Publicaçoes 2020, 6: 105.
9. Baldi JV, Victorino FR, Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N. Influence of embedding media on the assessment of electronic apex locators. J Endod. 2007 Apr; 33(4): 476-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.024
10. Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-125. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.16883
11. Bodur H, Odabaş M, Tulunoğlu O, Tinaz AC. Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Jun; 12(2): 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0157-5
12. Topaloglu-Ak A, Aykut Yetkiner A, Güniz Baksi B, Eronat C. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Jun; 16(2): 49-153.
13. Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RA, Raffaini MS. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008 Apr;41(4):317-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01366.x
14. Nelson-Filho P, Lucisano MP, Leonardo MR, da Silva RA, da Silva LA. Electronic working length determination in primary teeth by ProPex and digital signal processing. Aust Endod J. 2010 Dec; 36(3): 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00185.x
15. Ahmad IA, Pani SC. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in primary teeth: a meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2015 Mar;48(3):298-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12315
16. Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Rani ST, Rajesh A. Clinical evaluation of conventional radiography, radiovisiography, and an electronic apex locator in determining the working length in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):37-41
17. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep; 11(3): 376-379. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16
18. Senthil D, Eagappan ARS, Sathivajeeva J, Ramkumar S, Srinivasan D, Loui J. Comparison of the accuracy of Propex II electronic apex locator and conventional radiography for working length determination in primary anterior teeth. J Int Oral Health. 2016. 8(6): 729-732. https://doi.org/10.2047/jioh-08-06-17
19. Toscano MA, Zacharczuk GA. Tratamiento con pasta 3Mix-MP en molares primarios no vitales: estudio preliminar. Bol Asoc Argent Odontol Niños. 2016; 44: 12-17.
20. Mente J, Seidel J, Buchalla W, Koch MJ. Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Int Endod J. 2002 May; 35(5): 447-52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00500.x
21. Abdullah A, Singh N, Rathore MS, Tandon S, Rajkumar B. Comparative evaluation of electronic apex locators and radiovisiography for working length determination in primary teeth in vivo. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun; 9(2): 118-123. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1346
22. Borges MMB, Guimarães BM, Alves JD, Sena GN, Bernardes NA, Duarte MAH. Evaluation of the accuracy of two apex locators in apical limit: an in vitro study. Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2016; 25(74): 126-129.
How to Cite
Cardoso, M. L., Lugo De Langhe, C. D., & Díaz, N. G. (2022). In Vitro Determination of Working Length in Primary Teeth. Universitas Odontologica, 41. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo41.indw
Section
Clinical Practice