Keywords
legal history
torture
National Front
How to Cite
Abstract
This research article is part of a broader project about the intellectual history of human rights in Colombia between 1974 and 1998. This piece is a preliminary interpretation of the relationship between the Colombian left wing and the ideas of human rights that emerged between 1974 and 1978. The questions that structure this essay are: bearing in mind the classical distrust in liberal legality, what type of relationship did the left built with the rising ideas of human rights? Why was it possible for some leftist groups to embrace the human rights language? The hypothesis is that the left understood the defense of human rights as a project of naming and shaming the bourgeois state for unleashing violence and repression. Showing systematic violence intended to raise consciousness of a “popular social class” that was being targeted by state violence. To defend this thesis I focus on the context surrounding the publication of one of the first reports that tried to make sense of human rights ideas: El libro negro de la represión, written by the Comité de Solidaridad con los Presos Políticos, CSPP. In sum, this article is an interpretation of this report from the perspective of the tension between bourgeois legality (embodied in human rights) and the revolutionary project of the left.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.