Rosmery Cecilia García Ramos


Background: Early correction of class II malocclusions associated to mandibular retrognathism is possible through sustained and continuous mandibular advancement that does not require patient collaboration.  Purpose: To describe a case of malocclusion treated with a new fixed mandibular advance arch (FMAA). Case description: FMAA was applied to a 11-year-6-month-old skeletal class-II, division-1 girl with mandibular retrognathism and overbite. Results: After one-year treatment, there were functional and esthetic outcomes. ANB angle was reduced from 6.6° to 5.0°. Effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) increased (96.1 mm to 103.4 mm). Upper incisors inclinations went from 28,0° to 28,4°. Lower incisors experienced slight proinclinations (26.2° to 30.9°). Cephalograms after orthodontic treatment showed stable measures: ANB went from 5.0° to 5,1° and Co-Gn remained stable in 103.4°. Upper incisors had retroinclinations from 28.4° to 22.5° and lower incisors went from 30.9° to 28.2°. Conclusion: FMAA is a treatment alternative for mixed and early permanent dentitions for being a fixed appliance, it allows advancing mandible without requiring patient collaboration and during the necessary time to obtain changes. Because of its simple structure (cemented in the maxilla only to first molars), it advances without being fixed to the mandible every time the patient closes the mouth. In addition, it is easy to make, cement, activate, clean, and keep in mouth.



class II malocclusions, class II malocclusion treatment with fixed appliances, malocclusions, mandibular advance, mandibular retrognathism, maxillary orthopedics, orthopedic fixed appliances, dentistry, orthodontics, orthopedics

1. Cassidy SE, Stona R, Jackson D, Turpin L, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C, Hueng GJ. Classification and treatment of class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(4): 443-51.
2. Harris EF, Johnson MG. Heritability of craniometric and occlusal variables: a longitudinal sib analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Mar; 99(3): 258-68.
3. Harris, JE, Kowalski CJ. All in the family: use of familial information in orthodontic diagnosis, case assessment and treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69(5): 493-510.
4. Mendoza Oropeza L, Melendez Ocampo O, Ortiz Sanchez R, Fernández López A. Prevalence of malocclusions associated with pernicious oral habits in a Mexican sample. Rev Mex Ortod. 2014; 2(4): 216-23.
5. King L, Harris EF, Tolley EA. Heritability of cephalometric and occlusal variables as assessed from siblings with overt malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Aug; 104(2): 121-31.
6. Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Sep; 112(3): 338-42.
7. Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Oct; 112(4): 410-7.
8. Yokota S, Murakami T, Shimizuk A. A grow control approach to class 2 division 1, cases during puberty involving the simultaneous application of maxillary grow restriction and mandibular forward. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104 (3): 211-23
9. Keerthi VN, Kanya SD, Babu K, Mathew A, Kumar AN. Early Prevention and intervention of class II division 1 in growing patients. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016; 6(suppl 1): 579 -83.
10. Marsan G. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue profile change. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(2): 140-8.
11. Hagg U. Change in mandibular growth direction by means of Herbst appliance. A case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1992; 102(5): 456-63.
12. McNamara JA Jr, Peterson JE Jr, Alexander RG. Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of class 2 malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod. 1996; 2(2): 114-37.
13. Rabie AB, She TT, Harley VR. Forward mandibular positioning up-regulates SOX9 and type II collagen expression in the glenoid fossa. J Dent Res. 2003 Sep; 82(9): 725-30.
14. Satoh K. Mechanical advantage of area of origin for the external pterygoid muscle in two murid rodents, Apodemus speciosus and Clethrionomys rofocanus. J Morphol. 1999; 240(1): 1-14.
15. Zhou ZL, Huel Xi, Qiang Y, XueZa Z Differential expression of 16F-1 and its mRNA in mandibular condylar cartilage of rat. Direct evidence for servosystem theory of facial growth. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998 May; 16(2):164-5.
16. Graber T, Rakosi T, Petrovic A. Ortopedia con aparatos funcionales. 2ª ed. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1998.
17. Franco AA, Yamashita HK, Lederman HM, Cavidanes LH, Proffit WR, Vigorito J.W. Frankel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121(5): 447- 57.
18. Toth L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin- block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Dec; 116(6): 597-609.
19. Parra Quintero N, Botero Mariaca MP. Aparatos de avance mandibular: ¿Mito o realidad? Rev Nac Odontol. 2012 dic; 9(edición especial): 57-73.
20. Canut BL. Ortodoncia clinica y terapéutica. 2ª ed. Barcelona, España: Masson; 2000.
21. Pancherz H The Herbst appliance. Its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87(1): 1-20.
22. Herrera FS, Henrriques JF, Janson G, Franciscon MF, de Freitas KM. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper Jumper therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug; 140(2): e77-84.
23. De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA Jr. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(4): 540-7.
How to Cite
García Ramos, R. (2018). New Orthopedic Fixed Appliance to Treat Class II, Division 1 Malocclusions. Case Report. Universitas Odontologica, 37(78). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo37-78.naof
Clinical Practice
Most read articles by the same author(s)