Abstract
Through this article, I aim to understand the aesthetic experience in three bioartistic creations: Victimless Utopia (2003-2006) by TC&A, Malamp: Reliquaries (2001-) by Brandon Ballengée y Mother and Child (Divided) (1993) by Damien Hirst. I started from a qualitative hermeneutic-phenomenological approach based on the proposal of sensory ethnography. Through anthropological indepth interviews, as well as an autoethnography, I explored the dialogue that eleven spectators, of heterogeneous characteristics, developed around the pieces, in order to understand our aesthetic experience. I found that the aforementioned works of art put in crisis our notion of the unitary and certain pernicious dualisms of Western thought, which gives rise to monstrosity, through the fission of the sensitive fabric, hyperesthesia and dissent. During this process, new categories of thought emerged, like semi-living, distant life and nearby life. I was able to conclude that the aesthetic experience can be structured according to the identification of ways of twisting the sensitive fabric, the questioning of common sense, affective mobilization and dissent. My contribution consists in proposing an approach to the aesthetic experience of the monstrous which allows to specify how the mode of twisting the sensitive fabric is articulated with the crisis of dualistic thought and with the possibility of reconfiguring reality.
Aloi, Giovanni, Oron Catts y Ionat Zurr. 2019. “Oron Catts and Ionat Zurr: Art and the Semi-Living”. Antennae, n.º47: 49-65.
Aloi, Giovanni. 2015. “Editorial”. Antennae, n.º 33: 3.
Ballengée, Brandon. 2009. “An impetus for Biological Research in the Arts: A Practitioners Statement”. En Research in Art, Nature & Environment, 1-14. Falmouth: University College Falmouth.
Ballengée, Brandon. 2015. “Ecological Understanding through Transdisciplinary Art and Participatory Biology”. Tesis de doctorado. Plymouth University. https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=foahb-theses-other.
Balza, Isabel. 2013. “Tras los monstruos de la biopolítica”. Dilemata 5, n.º 12: 27-46. https://www.dilemata.net/
revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/214/249.
Barr, Jessica Marion. 2017. “Auguries of Elegy The Art and Ethics of Ecological Grieving”. En Mourning Nature :
Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief, editado por Ashlee Cunsolo y Karen Landman, 190-226.Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Beltrán Luengas, Elsa María. 2022. “Conflictos bioéticos y estéticos en el bioarte: Una perspectiva desde las emociones”. Antípoda 46: 51-74. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda46.2022.03
Beltrán Luengas, Elsa María. 2023. “La emoción en la experiencia estética del bioarte: Un estudio de casos”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad El Bosque. https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/0c1f9d83-ef58-49c7-92c0-5ce3993aa86a/content.
Braidotti, Rosi. 1999. “Signs of Wonder and Traces of Doubt: On Teratology and Embodied Differences”. En Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, editado por Janet Price y Margrit Shildrick, 290-301. Nueva York: Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094106-34.
Cao, Yilin, Joseph P. Vacanti, Keith T. Paige, Joseph Upton y Charles A. Vacanti. 1997. “Transplantation of Chondrocytes Utilizing a Polymer-Cell Construct to Produce Tissue-Engineered Cartilage in the Shape of a Human Ear”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 100, n.º 2: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199708000-00001.
Carrasco Conde, Ana. 2017. Presencias irreales: Simulacros, espectros y construcción de realidades. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
Carroll, Noël. 2020. “Fantastic Biologies and the Structures of Horrific Imagery”. En The Monster Theory Reader, editado por Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, 136-47. Mineápolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Catts, Oron y Ionat Zurr. 2006. “DIY Devictimisation Kit, mark 1 (DIY DVK, m1)”. https://tcaproject.net/portfolio/diy-dvk/.
Catts, Oron y Ionat Zurr. 2007. “Semi-Living Art”. En Signs of Life: BioArt and Beyond, editado por Eduardo Kac, 231-47. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Catts, Oron y Ionat Zurr. 2012. “Le corps prolongé”. En Bioart : Transformations du vivant, editado por Louise Poissant y Ernestine Daubner, 315-31. Montreal: Presses de l’Universitè de Québec.
Coetser, Yolandi M. 2020. “Cruel Art: Intersections between Art, Animals, and Morality”. de arte 55, n.º 1: 5775.https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2019.1643072.
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. 2020. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses)”. En The Monster Theory Reader, editado por Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, 37-56. Mineápolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Denzin, Norman K. y Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2013. “Introduction”. En Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, editado por Norman K. Denzin y Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1-41. Los Ángeles: Sage.
Ellis, Carolyn y Arthur P. Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity”. En Handbook of Qualitative Research, editado por Norman Denzin e Yvonna Lincoln (2.ª ed.), 733-68. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2016. Estética y hermenéutica (3.ª ed.). Madrid: Tecnos.
González Valenzuela, Juliana. 2017. Bíos: El cuerpo del alma y el alma del cuerpo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Guber, Rosana. 2001. La etnografía: Método, campo y reflexividad. Bogotá: Norma.
Haraway, Donna. 2020. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others”. En The Monster Theory Reader, editado por Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, 459-521. Mineápolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Have, Henk Ten. 2022. Bizarre Bioethics. Ghosts, Monsters, and Pilgrims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Howes, David. 2023. Sensorial Investigations. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Ingold, Tim. 2017. “¡Suficiente con la etnografía!”. Revista Colombiana de Antropología 53, n.º 2: 143-59.https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.120.
Kac, Eduardo. 2007. “Life Transformation: Art Mutation”. En Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond, editado por Eduardo Kac, 163-84. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kerbe, Wolfgang y Markus Schmidt. 2015. “Splicing Boundaries: The Experiences of Bioart Exhibition Visitors Open Access”. Leonardo 48, n.º 2: 128-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00701.
Kreuz, Roger. 2023. Ironía y sarcasmo. Santiago: Universidad Católica.
Kristeva, Julia. 2020. Los poderes de la perversión (9.ª ed.). México: Siglo XXI.
Lapworth, Andrew. 2015. “Habit, Art, and the Plasticity of the Subject: The Ontogenetic Shock of the Bioart Encounter”. Cultural Geographies 22, n.º 1: 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013491926.
Lapworth, Andrew. 2016. “Theorizing Bioart Encounters after Gilbert Simondon”. Theory, Culture & Society 33, n.º 3: 123-50.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415580173.
Lebrun, Annie. 2018. Ce qui n’a pas de prix. París: Éditions Stock.
López del Rincón, Daniel. 2015. Bioarte: Arte y vida en la era de la tecnología. Madrid: Akal.
Mitchell, Robert. 2010. Bioart and the Vitality of Media. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Montani, Pietro. 2013. Bioesthétique: Sens commun, technique et art à l’âge de la globalisation. París: Vrin.
Muñoz, Diana María. 2012. Arte y verdad: La experiencia estética en la hermenéutica de Hans-Georg Gadamer. Bogotá: Editorial Bonaventuriana.
Osborne, Peter. 2011. Arte conceptual. Barcelona: Phaidon Press.
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4.ª ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pink, Sarah. 2015. Doing Sensory Ethnography (2.ª ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Quintana, Laura. 2020. Política de los cuerpos: Emancipaciones desde y más allá de Jacques Ranciére.Barcelona: Herder.
Radomska, Marietta. 2016. “Uncontainable Life: A Biophilosophy of Bioart”. Tesis de doctorado. Linköping University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:916178/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Radomska, Marietta. 2017. “Non/living Matter, Bioscientific Imaginaries and Feminist Technoecologies of Bioart”. Australian Feminist Studies 32, n.º 94: 377-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2017.1466649.
Rancière, Jacques. 1996. El desacuerdo: Política y filosofía. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Rancière, Jacques. 2000. Le partage du sensible. París: La Fabrique.
Rancière, Jacques. 2014. Aisthesis: Escenas del régimen estético del arte. Santander: Shangrila.
Rancière, Jacques. 2019. “Diez tesis sobre política”. En Disenso: Ensayos sobre estética y política, editado por
Jacques Ranciére y Steven Corcoran, 51-70. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Robson, Jon. 2014. “A Social Epistemology of Aesthetics: Belief Polarization, Echo Chambers and Aesthetic Judgement”. Synthese 191, n.º 11: 2513-28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0437-y.
Senior, Adele. 2014. “Relics of Bioart: Ethics and Messianic Aesthetics in Performance Documentation”. Theatre Journal 66, n.º 6: 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2014.0046.
Singley, Paulette. 2018. “Procrustean Boxes: Architecture and Slaughter”. En The Bloomsbury Handbook of Food
and Popular Culture, editado por Kathleen Lebesco y Peter Naccarato, 184-96. Londres: Bloomsbury.
Stubrin, Lucía. 2021. Bioarte: Poéticas de lo viviente. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
Vasalou, Sophia. 2015. Wonder: A Grammar. Albany: University of New York Press.
Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew. 2020. “Introduction: A Genealogy of Monster Theory”. En The Monster Theory Reader, editado por Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, 1-36. Mineápolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wolfe, Cary. 2007. “Bioethics and the Posthumanist Imperative”. En Signs of Life: Bioart and Beyond, editado por Eduardo Kac, 95-114. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zylinska, Joanna. 2009. Bioethics in the Age of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Elsa María Beltrán Luengas