Decolonising Local Knowledge – Arhuaco Filmmaking as a Form of Cultural Opposition
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Can filmmaking as a form of intercultural communication serve as an apparatus for selfidentification and cultural opposition to established North/West knowledge pro- duction hubs? Based on extensive fieldwork in the Sierra Nevada and detailed analysis of the Arhucao films and their production and distribution strategies, this article explores the possibility of utilising film and audio-visual communication as a way to decolonise local knowledge. Following decades of persecutions, hostility, illtreatment and cultural violence, the work of Zhigoneshi (and, later, Yosokwi) communication col- lectives not only helped to nourish the cultural identity of the indigenous communities of Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, but it also turned them into proud ambassadors of indigenous values on the international level. Prolific in their internal and external com- munication practices, they regained agency as full participants of intercultural dialogue, which focuses on the importance of the inclusion, diversity and dewesternisation of local knowledge. While acknowledging its own limitations and the author’s inevitable positionality, this article also reflects on further steps that the European and Western collaborators and institutions need to take to accomplish the vision of decolonisation. It concludes with acknowledging the work of the Arhuaco filmmakers and their allies in providing an invaluable contribution to strengthen this discussion and enable the shift towards a more all-embracing pattern of knowledge production and dissemina- tion based on quality and importance and less so on stereotypical preconceptions and geographical location.
cinematografía, descolonización, comunicación intercultural, arhuacos, autoconservación, conocimiento localfilmmaking, decolonisation, intercultural communication, Arhuacos, self-preservation, local knowledgecinematografia, descolonização, comunicação intercultural, arhuacos, autopreservação, conhecimento local
Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2014.
“Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues”. Postcolonial Studies, 17:2, 115-121, DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
Dicks, Bella. 2004. Culture on Display: The Production of Contemporary Visitability. (Issues in Cultural and Media Studies), London: Open University Press
Ereira, Alan. 2009. The Elder Brother’s Warning.
Ereira, Alan. 1992. The Heart of the World.
Fanon, Franz. 1965. A Dying Colonialism. New York: Grove Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 2000. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gilbert, Helen and Gleghorn, Charlotte. 2014. Eds. Recasting Commodity and Spectacle in the Indigenous Americas. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Ginsburg, Faye. 1991. “Indigenous Media: Faustian Contract or Global Village.” Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 6, No.1, pp92-112, Wiley.
Gleghorn, Charlotte. 2013. “Reconciliation en minga: Indigenous Video and Social Justice in Colombia.” Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies. 22:2, 169-194.
Hall, Stuart. Ed. 1997. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications.
Hearne, Joanna. 2012. Native Recognition. Indigenous Cinema and the Western. New York: Suny Press, State University of New York Press.
Hendry, Joy. 2005. Reclaiming Culture. Indigenous People and Self- Representation. New York: Pelgrave Macmillan.
Leuthold, Stephen. 1998. Indigenous Aesthetics, Native Art, Media and Identity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
López Mape, Valentina. 2014. “VOSTF Entrevista a Amado Villafaña, codirector del documental Resistencia en la línea negra”. October 12, 2014. Interview, 14:50. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=rEoY5AcN46Q
Lulkowska, Agata. 2018. “Voice of the Arhuacos: Transcending the Borders of “Indigenous” Filmmaking in Colombia.” The Journal of Communication and Media Studies. Common Ground Research Network. 4(2).
Lulkowska, Agata. 2020. “The Voice of the Sierra Nevada: Intercultural Communication and De-colonial Strategies in the Arhuaco Filmmaking and Collaborations.” Anthrovision Vaneasa Online Journal. Vol. 7.2.
MacDougall, David. 2006. The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography and the Senses. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
MacDougall, David. 1998. Transcultural Cinema. Princeton University Press.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. Routledge.
Mora, Pablo. Ed. 2015. Poéticas de la Resistencia. El Video Indígena en Colombia. Bogotá: Cinemateca Distrital.
Nichols, Bill. 1991. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Blooming and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Nichols, Bill. 1994. Blurred Boundaries: Questions of Meaning in Contemporary Culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Raheja, Michelle H. 2014. “’Will making movies do the sheep any good?’ The afterlife of Native American images.|” Recasting commodity and spectacle in the indigenous Americas. London: School of Advanced Study: University of London.
Rony Tobing, Fatimah. 1996. The Third Eye: Race, Cinema and Ethnographic Spectacle. Durham and London: Duke University Press
Ruby, Jay. 2000. Picturing Culture. Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Russell, Catherine. 1999. Experimental Ethnography: The Work of Film in the Age of Video. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Schiwy, Freya. 2009. Indianizing Film. Decolonization, The Andes, and the Question of Technology. New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press.
Torres Márquez, Vicencio. 1978. Los Indios Ahuacos y “La Vida de la Civilisation.” Bogotá: Libreria y Editorial America Latina.
de Vinalesa, Padre Jose. 1952. Indios Arhuacos de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta; Descripción geográfica - Costumbres de los Indios, Idioma Arhuaco. Bogotá: Editorial Iqueima.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.