Abstract
Este artículo tiene por objetivo estudiar los límites y forma de relación entre aseguradores y
prestadores del régimen contributivo en Bogotá, así como relacionar la manera como se organiza
el intercambio de servicios de salud con los resultados percibidos por las instituciones prestadoras
de servicios de salud (IPS). La investigación se soporta desde el punto de vista teórico
en la economía de los costos de transacción. El componente empírico se hizo en 17 IPS en
Bogotá. Se encontraron tres formas fundamentales de intercambio económico: cooperación en
el mercado, mercado jerarquizado y cooperación potencial. En cuanto a las diferencias en desempeño,
se encontró que el mercado jerarquizado presenta resultados de desempeño inferiores
a la cooperación potencial.
Copyright notice
The Journal Management and Health Policies is registered under the Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the name of the authors and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are recognized. It is allowed to quote, adapt, transform, autoarchive, republish and create from the material, for any purpose (including commercial), provided that authorship is properly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided and if changes have been mad. The Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not retain the rights over published works and the contents are the exclusive responsibility of the authors, who preserve their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights.
The endorsement of the intervention of the work (revision, style correction, translation, layout) and its subsequent disclosure is granted through a license to use and not through a transfer of rights, which means that the journal and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana disclaims any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct on the part of the authors. As a result of the protection provided by the license for use, the journal is not obliged to publish retractions or modify the information already published, unless the erratum arises from the process of editorial management. The publication of contents in this magazine does not represent royalties for taxpayers.