Published Jun 30, 2015



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Martín Emilio Romero-Prada

Lina María Huérfano-Rey

Mary Luz Páez

Germán Acero-Acero

Pamela Andrea Alfonso-Quiñones

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Objective: Performing a cost-utility analysis to assess the treatment with different insulin options in patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Methodology: Based on the analysis previously performed by Romero et al., we updated the information and included an specific analysis for the quality of life. The Markov model simulated patients treated with nph, determir, or glargine insulin. We considered the hypoglycemia events and their complications. The costs corresponded to the maximum regulated price per dose. The event costs were taken from the transaction information system records of health care providers in 2014. Results: The qaly with detemir are calculated as 2.604, compared to 2.545 with glargine, and 2.533 con nph. The sensitivity analysis show determir dominance. Conclusions: Detemir is a favorable option due to its safety, effectiveness, and cost, with proven benefits measured in qaly over the other items being compared.

 

 

 

Keywords

diabetes mellitus tipo 2, insulina, calidad de vida, análisis de costo-utilidad, efectividaddiabetes mellitus type 2, insulin, quality of life, cost-utility analysis, effectivenessdiabetes mellitus tipo 2, insulina, qualidade de vida, análise de custo-efetividade, efetividade

References
How to Cite
Romero-Prada, M. E., Huérfano-Rey, L. M., Páez, M. L., Acero-Acero, G., & Alfonso-Quiñones, P. A. (2015). Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of Detemir in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Gerencia Y Políticas De Salud, 14(28). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgyps18-28.acuu
Section
Artículos