Keywords
construct validity and convergent
test-retest reliability
Colombian population
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the psychometric properties of the Stroop Color and Word Test Golden (2007) in Colombian nonclinical population. 1,332 participants, 561 males (42.1%) and 771 women (57.9%) between 7 and 80 years old, (M = 29.80 SD = 17.95) grouped into age ranges of 16-44 years (48.5%), 7-15 (28.1%), 45-64 (18.1%) and 65-80 (5.2%). Reliability was assessed using test-retest through intraclass correlation coefficient with IC95% far ten minutes between the two applications. Construct validity was measured by Principal Component Analysis ACP. Convergent validity was calculated by Pearson r between Stroop subscales and TMT-B. Parallel analysis of Horn and gave evidence ACP three components explaining 86.84% of the variance. Pearson r correlations Stroop and TMT-B were significant at 0.01 to -0.41 values for P; -0.35 for C; from -0.40 to -0.14 for PC and Interference. Reliability found was higher than 0.70 in all Stroop scales. Discriminant validity found no difference between men and women, but if for age stratum and schooling. Means and standard deviations were lower Colombian population at all scales to the Spanish version, which can be explained by significant cultural differences. These results support the Stroop is valid and reliable for different age groups of no pathological populations in Colombia.
Agudelo, E., & Guzmán, C. (2012). Normalización y Características Psicométricas del Stroop, Test de Colores y Palabras en una muestra de escolares entre 7 y 16 años de la ciudad de Tunja. Tunja: Uptc.
Bauer, R.M., Tobias, B. & Valenstein, E. (1993). Amnesic disorders. En Heilman, K.M., & Valenstein, E. (Eds.), Clinical Neuropsychology (pp.214-228). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bausela, E., & Santos, J. (2006). Utilidad Del Stroop en la Psicología Clínica. Revista Internacional On-line, 5(1) Recuperado de http://www.psiquiatria.com/ revistas/index.php/asmr/article/view/912/
Brett, W., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 3(8). Recuperado de http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol8/iss3/1
Burin, D. I., Drake, M. A., & Harris, P. (2007). Evaluación neuropsicológica en adultos. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Casal, J. & Mateu, E. (2003). Muestreo por conveniencia. Slideshare. Recuperado de http:// www.slideshare.net/selene1524/muestreo-porconveniencia#btnPrevious
Cerdá, E. (1978). Psicometría general [segunda edición]. Barcelona, España: Editorial Herder.
Chapi, J. (2011). Rendimiento neuropsicológico de personas con esquizofrenia pertenecientes a un programa de rehabilitación integral. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14(4), 136-159. Recuperado de http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/epsicologia/epi-2011/epi114h.pdf
Comalli Jr., P. E., Wapner, S., & Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100(1), 47-53.
Conca Binfa, B., & Ibarra González, M. (2004). Estandarización de la prueba de colores y palabras de STROOP en niños de 8 a 12 años para la Región Metropolitana. Tesis de grado inédita. Santiago: Universidad de Chile. Recuperado de http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/113385
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Dodrill, C. B. (1978). A neuropsychological battery for epilepsy. Epilepsia, 19(6), 611-623.
Espinosa, A. (2008). Validación y estandarización del Test de Colores y Palabras STROOP con una muestra de niños y adolescentes Bogotanos. Tesis inédita. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Golden, C. J. (2007). Stroop test de colores y palabras, manual (5° Ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Golden, J. (2001). Stroop test de colores y palabras, manual (3° Ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Golden, C. J. (1994). Stroop: test de colores y palabras: manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Golden, C. J. (1975). A group version of the Stroop Color and Word Test. Journal of personality assessment, 39(4), 386-388.
Golden, C. J. (1974). Sex differences in performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39(3), 1067-1070.
Guttman, L. (1953). Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 18, 277-296.
Henao-Arboleda, E., Muñoz, C., Aguirre-Acevedo, D. C., Lara, E., Pineda, D. A., & Lopera, F. (2010). Datos normativos de pruebas neuropsicológicas en adultos mayores en una población Colombiana. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 5(3), 214-226.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comments on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393-416.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30,179-185.
Houston, B. K., &Jones, T. M. (1967). Distraction and Stroop Color Word Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 54–56.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
León, F. (2013). Proyecto Tesis de Maestría: Desarrollo de un modelo de estándares de Prueba para uso de pruebas Psicológicas en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203.
Malek, A., Hekmati, I., & Amiri, S. (2013). The Standardization of Victoria Stroop Color-Word Test among Iranian Bilingual Adolescents. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 380.
Malhotra, N. (2004). Investigación de mercados un enfoque aplicado (cuarta edición). México: Pearson educación.
Martín, R., Hernández, S., Rodríguez, C., García, E., Díaz, A., & Jiménez, J. E. (2012). Datos normativos para el Test de Stroop: patrón de desarrollo de la inhibición y formas alternativas para su evaluación. European Journal of Education & Psychology, 5(1), 39-51.
Maureira, F., Aravena, C., Gálvez, C., & Flores, E. (2014). Propiedades Psicométricas y datos normativos del test de stroop y del test torre de Hanoi en estudiantes de educación física de Chile. Rev GPU, 10(3), 344-349.
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.
Norman, G.R. & Streiner D.L. (1996). Bioestadística. Madrid: Mosby-Doyma libros
Ostrosky F, Ardila A, Rosselli M (1991). Evaluación neuropsicológica breve en español-NEUROPSI. México: Publingenio S.A.
Partington, J.E. & Leiter, R.G.(1949). Partington`s Pathway Test. The Psychological Service Center Bulleton. 1, 9-20
Perea Bartolomé, M., & Ladera Fernández, V. (1995). Rendimientos neuropsicológicos: edad, educación y sexo. Psicothema, 7(1), 105-112.
Pérez, M. (2009). Manual de Neuropsicología Clínica. Madrid: Pirámide.
Portellano, A. (2009). ENFEN Evaluación Neuropsicológica de las Funciones Ejecutivas en Niños. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Regard, M. (1981). Cognitive rigidity and flexibility: A neuropsychological study. Unpublished Ph.D. disertation, University of Victoria
Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test Manual for Administratión and Scoring. Tucson: Reitan Neuropsichology Laboratory.
Rognoni, M. T., Casals-Coll, G., Sánchez-Benavides, M., Quintana, R. M., Manero, L., Calvo, R., Palomo, F., Aranciva, F., Tamayo, J., & Peña-Casanova. (2013). Spanish normative studies in young adults (NEURONORMA young adults project): Norms for Stroop Color–Word Interference and Tower of London-Drexel University tests. Neurología (English Edition), 28(2), 73-80. Recuperado de http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-generica295-articulo-estudios-normativos-espanoles-poblacion-adulta-90193606
Ruiz, M. A., & San Martín, R. (1992). Una simulación sobre el comportamiento de la regla K1 en la estimacón del número de factores [The behavior of the K1 rule estimating the number of factors: A study with simulated data]. Psicothema, 4(2), 543-550.
Serra, A. & Peña, J. (2006). Fiabilidad test-retest e interevaluador del Test Barcelona. Neurología, 21(6), 277-281.
Soares, S. (2009). Adaptación del test de colores y palabras de stroop en una muestra portuguesa. Influencia de la reserva cognitiva en la función ejecutiva de sujetos sanos y con enfermedad tipo alzheimer de inicio tardío. Tesis inédita. Salamanca: Universidad Salamanca.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643-662.
Van der Elst, W., Van Boxtel, M. P., Van Breukelen, G. J., & Jolles, J. (2006). The Stroop Color-Word Test influence of age, sex, and education; and normative data for a large sample across the adult age range. Assessment, 13(1), 62-79.
Widaman, K. F. (2007). Common factors versus components: Principals and principles, errors and misconceptions. En R. Cudeck, & R. C. MacCallum (Eds.). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Wright, B. C., & Wanley, A. (2003). Adults’ versus children’s performance on the Stroop task: Interference and facilitation. British Journal of Psychology, 94(4), 475-485.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.