Keywords
social psychology
latin countries
Venezuela
How to Cite
Abstract
The present study presents the mean risk magnitude judgments on 91 activities, substances, and technologies expressed by Venezuelan adults living in the two main cities of this country: Caracas and Maracaibo. These judgments were compared methodically with findings on other samples of previous studies, namely four other Latin countries: France, Spain, Brazil, and Portugal. The aim of this study was to structure the cross-country differences in risk perception between the aforementioned countries and Venezuela using cluster analysis. A 91-hazard x 5 country matrix was created. Two main clusters were found. The Economically and Socially Challenging group (Venezuela and Portugal) and the Western Europe group (France and Spain). Brazil was situated closer to the Venezuelan and Portugal cluster than was the Western Europe group. The common denominator in the Economically and Socially Challenging group can be the economic and social problems that both of these countries struggle against. It was reasonable that Brazil was closer to this cluster, given its similarities to both countries (in geographical and cultural terms). More explanations for these clusters were presented in the discussion. Finally, some recommendations and limitations are also presented and more research in this field is suggested as well.
Acknowledgements: I am grateful to Félix Neto (Universidade do Porto, Portugal) and Etienne Mullet (École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris) for their thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
References
Ahmed, R., Macri, D., & Mullet, E. (2006). Societal risk perception among Egyptian adolescents and adults. Journal of Northern-Africa Studies, 11 , 323-334.
Alves, J. F. (2003). Perspectiva histórica da emigração portuguesa. In P. Morais, L. S. Martins, J. F. Alves, M. C. P. Ramos, e J. A. Cesário (Eds.), Porto de partida – Porto de chegada. A emigração portuguesa (pp. 33-56, 1ªed.). Lisboa: Âncora.
Bouyer, M., Bagdassarian, S., Chaabane, S., & Mullet, E. (2001). Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 21 , 457-465
Chauvin, B., Hermand, D., & Mullet, E. (2007). Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Analysis, 27 , 171-185.
Chauvin, B., Macri, D., & Mullet, E. (2007). Societal risk perception: A 19-country comparison. Studii si Cercetari , 25-35.
Finucane, M. L., & Maybery, M. T. (1996). Risk perception in Australia. Psychological Reports, 79 , 1331-1338.
Fonseca, M. L. (2007). Inserção territorial. Urbanismo, desenvolvimento regional e políticas locais de atracção. In A. Vitorino, P. Catarino, P. T. Da Cruz, M. L. Fonseca, D. Justino, F. L. Manchado, J. Peixoto, e R. P. Pires (Eds.), Imigração: Oportunidade ou ameaça? Recomendações do Fórum Gulbenkian Imigração. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (pp. 104-150). Estoril: Princípia.
Heath, L. (1984). Impact of newspaper crime reports on fear of crime: Multimethodological investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 , 263-276.
Koné, D., & Mullet, E. (1994). Societal risk perception and media coverage. Risk Analysis, 14 , 21-24.
Kpanake, L., Chauvin, B., & Mullet, E. (2008). Societal risk perception among African villagers without access to the media. Risk Analysis, 28 , 1-10.
Marques, J.C.L. (2008). Os portugueses na Suíça. Migrantes europeus (1ª ed.). Lisboa: ICS.
Mateo, C., & Ledezma, T. (2006). Los venezolanos como emigrantes. Estúdio exploratório en España. Análisis de Conyuntura, 12 (2), 245-267.
Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Gatelier, S., Portell, M., Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2006). Societal risk perception among a sample of Spanish students. Contemporary Politics and Economics of Europe, 18 , 127-138.
Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2000). Societal risk perception by the Portuguese public. European Review of Applied Psychology , 49 , 155-163.
Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2001). Societal risks as seen by Chinese students living in Macao. Journal of Risk Research, 4 , 63-73.
Nyland, L. G. (1993). Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden . Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.
Rohrmann, B. (1994). Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross national comparison. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46 , 150-163.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 91-125). Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236 , 280-285.
Transparency International (2012). Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/country#VEN .
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.