Abstract
It is necessary to evaluate the learning context and individual characteristics of learners to understand the adult learning process. In this study, adult learning processes at non-formal situations according to Kolb´s model (1984) are described, considering its variability according to individual characteristics. Variability in adult learning processes was found, with socio-laboral conditions and risk trajectories playing a relevant role. These results are discussed, and methodological implications for planning adult learning experiences are highlighted.
American Psychological Association. (2011). Manual de publicaciones de la APA: guía de entrenamiento para el estudiante. México D. F.: American Psychological Association.
Belzer, A. (2004). “It’s not like normal school”: The role of prior learning contexts in adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 41-59.
Bhatti, R., & Bart, W. (2013). On the effect of learning styles on the scholastic achievement. Current Issues in Education, 16(2), 1-6.
Blanco, N., y Rodríguez, C. (2015) Actitud y compromiso hacia la escuela en estudiantes de secundaria considerados de éxito escolar. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(3), 542-568.
Can, S. (2011). Investigation of the relationships between the learning styles of preservice elementary teachers and some variables. Journal of Education, 41, 70-82.
Cavas, B. (2010). A study on pre-service science, class and mathematics teachers' learning styles in Turkey. Science Education International, 21(1), 47-61.
Cavanagh, S. (1995). The assessment of student nurse learning styles using the kolb learning styles inventory. Nurse Education Today, 15(3), 177-183.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review. Recuperado de http://sxills.nl.
Cubero, R. (2005). Perspectivas constructivistas. La intersección entre el significado, la interacción y el discurso. Barcelona: Graó.
Delors, J. (1996). La educación encierra un tesoro. Informe de la Comisión Internacional sobre educación para el siglo XXI. Madrid: Santillana.
Ellinger, A. (2005). Contextual factors influencing informal learning in a workplace setting: the case of reinventing itself company. Human Resource Development, 16(3), 389-415.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido (19ª ed.). Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2008). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Heffler, B. (2001). Individual learning style and the learning style inventory. Educational Studies, 27(3), 307-316.
Hidalgo, M. V., Menéndez, S., Sánchez, J., López, I., Jiménez, L., Lorence, B. (2005). ‘Inventario de Situaciones Estresantes y de Riesgo (ISER)’. Documento sin publicar. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Jiménez, L., & Hidalgo, M. V. (2012). ¿Cómo se explica el cambio en las familias que participan en programas de formación y apoyo familiar? Sistemas Familiares, 28(1), 7-24.
Jinkens, R. (2009). Nontraditional students: who are they? College Student, 43(4), 979-987.
Kandil, S. (2015). Turkish pre-service physics teachers' preferred learning styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(4), 403-415.
Kim, S., & McLean, G. (2014). The impact of national culture on informal learning in the workplace. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory, 64(1), 39-59.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (1999). Bibliography of research on experiential learning theory and the Learning Style Inventory. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. (2007). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory 3.1. Boston: Hay Learning.
Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL, 48(2), 275-299.
Lancho, J. (2009). La educación de adultos, problemas y retos de futuro. En Educación de personas adultas en las fuerzas armadas (pp. 27-40). Madrid: Ministerio de Defensa.
Marsick, V. (2003). Invited reaction: Informal learning and the transfer of learning: How managers develop proficiency. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 389-395.
Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, A. (2012). An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 597-609.
Narli, S., Ozgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2011). In the context of multiple intelligences theory, intelligent data analysis of learning styles was based on rough set theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 613-618.
Papalia, D., & Feldman, R. (2012). Desarrollo Humano. México, D.F.: McGraw-Hill.
Pizarro, T. (2012). De la pedagogía a la andragogía en la educación superior. Revista Caribeña de Ciencias Sociales, 3, 1-31.
Requejo, A. (2003).Educación permanente y educación de adultos. Barcelona: Ariel.
Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., Martín, J. C., & Byrne, S. (2008). Preservación familiar: un enfoque positivo para la intervención con familias. Madrid: Pirámide.
Rodrigo, M., Máiquez, M., & Martín, J. (2010). La educación parental como recurso psicoeducativo para promover la parentalidad positiva. Madrid: FEM.
Rodríguez, G., Rodrigo, M. J., Martín, J. C., & Máiquez, M. L. (2005). El asesoramiento a familias con riesgo psicosocial. En J. I. Pozo, La práctica del asesoramiento educativo a examen (pp. 139-152). Barcelona: Graó.
Rogers, R. (2004). Storied selves: A critical discourse analysis of adult learners’ iterate lives. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 272-305.
Sarrate, M. (2009). Rasgos singulares del aprendizaje adulto. En Educación de personas adultas en las fuerzas armadas (pp. 27-40). Madrid: Gráficas.
Sahasrabudhe, V., & Kanungo, S. (2014). Appropriate media choice for e-learning effectiveness: Role of learning domain and learning style. Computers & Education, 76, 237-249.
Undurraga, C. (2004). ¿Cómo aprenden los adultos? Santiago de Chile: Universidad Católica.
Van Doorn, K., McManus, F., & Yiend, J. (2012). An analysis of matching cognitive-behavior therapy techniques to learning styles. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 1039-1044.
Willingham, D. (2014). Strategies make learning last. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 10-15.
Wu, Y., & Wu, H. (2015). Higher education learning experiences among Vietnamese immigrant women in Taiwan. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory, 65(2), 133-151.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.